Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
If that were actually true, as opposed to in your head, at least a few of your conclusions would have been acknowledged here.

Contrary to the often entrenched attitudes displayed by proponents od alternative thought, many here would be more than pleased if some of the ideas offered were true; their utility would be enormous and of benefit to the whole planet.


If you really believed that you would have attempted a serious investigation before now, instead of just talking about one endlessly.

I don't have a single doubt that what i am doing is to the benefit of the whole planet and the destiny of mankind.

I agree with you that my conclusions would have been acknowledged here, but if that doesn't happen, does it mean than that the conclusions are invalid or are you just incapable of dealing with it?

That's the question.
 
Crack you up? Us? You are doing a fine job yourself Dutch. Remember you believe you can predict the future and see 'signs' in random coincidence.

Go back and read your early stuff and compare it to what you write now....notice anything?

Yes I have noticed something. have you read the early stuff ?

I'm curious now, so could you please elaborate?
 
Dutch it is quite easy - I'll take it step by step

You are self delusional

You support that delusion by making stuff up

Yes I have sorted it all out, see the two sentences above



Profounness? More like gekheid

So you think I am grazy right?

You are pathetic, deal with this with valid arguments if you can
 
Show the math you used to come up with this. You keep throwing around mathematical and geometric terms, so you must have some equations to post. Where are they?

the specific underlying design has been discussed here several times here Wolrab. Do I really have to find the posts for you or do you think you can manage yourself?
 
You were not quoting the given explanations earlier in this thread as you should have done.
You do seem to be having more trouble with simple communication lately.

There is no reason for me to overly complicate the issue by quoting from a post I am not referring to; I was responding specifically to the nonsense that

"They don't have 3 dimensional shape in our reality, only the correlating orbital positions remain as explained before"

The fact that you have repeated the nonsense has no bearing on it's validity.


I haven't read your previous 2 posts as you are still splitting it in sentences.
This is a very childish and completely unnecessary attitude.

Each quote is generally a self-contained point with the responses in one post corresponding to one post of yours.

If you wish to treat every quote as a separate post there is nothing to stop you, but I am not going to waste time and use more JREF resources just because you are incapable of reading one sentence that is a little closer to the next than it could be.
 
So, Dutch dumps 20 posts in a row, and it's all about, he says: "I have this thought out of nowhere", he posts news stories and unsupported or unsupportable statements, and it's all true, because else, he says: "I wouldn't do this".
To top it all, he says that what he has to say is profound.

Okidoki

Is there a bit delusion of grandeur here?

in your post you mean?
 
I don't have a single doubt that what i am doing is to the benefit of the whole planet and the destiny of mankind.

So what has changed from when you were young and as you put it thought you "knew it all" and mistakenly thought you “had a very skeptical mind” as you evidently still just “don't have a single doubt” about what you are doing? Is it just that you make yourself feel happy about not having “a single doubt” now?
 
Point me to the place where you predicted Theo Van Gogh's death,and give me another prediction.
Theo's death unveiled the hidden design, everything that has followed on this pattern has been lessened in impact and the expectations have been posted here several times. haven't you noticed? you should have
 
Has someone already mentioned to Dutch that something of note happens pretty much every day (it's called news), and therefore any random "time coded spiral" can look like it confirms a "pattern"?


yawn
 
So you agree that you don’t actually use a tetrahedron but still use the word tetrahedron? Why do you reference a specific geometrical shape that you “agree” you don’t use?

I use the tetrahedronal based geometry. It has been obvious from day 1 on. don't blame me on this one, it should have been clear to you because it has been explained repeatedly. Do your research I would say
 
I mean what I say
This is the point where it becomes easier to see why those with less self control tend to Godwin themselves.


its about platonic solid geometry corresponding with orbital positions.
Platonic solids are three dimensional figures.

You have never provided any reason to suspect that the position on it's orbit of any object has any bearing on the lives of the inhabitants of one insignificant planet in one insignificant solar system in one insignificant part of one insignificant galaxy.


expand your mind
Ah, that's the problem. Well it would certainly explain a lot.
 
Once again a tetrahedron is specifically a 3-dimensional shape in “our dimensional realm” that “geometry” does not remain in your HD nonsense because you never use it to begin with. Stop being simply and clearly deliberately deceptive Dutch.
we are not at the same level of thought here apparently. try to be Michio Kaku's carp that jumps out of the pool.

There has never been any 3D shape is the deometrical correlations that have been given when it comes to hyper dimensional platonic solids

you are stuck
 
Its true that you don't seem to understand it yes
Which of these do you suppose is the most likely explanation:

1- That no one here has the intellectual capacity to grasp your amazing revelations.

or

2- That you have not provided, and seem incapable of providing, a single expanation of how anything you say might be true.
 
I don't have a single doubt that what i am doing is to the benefit of the whole planet and the destiny of mankind.
Something which says far more about your state of mind than anything else.


I agree with you that my conclusions would have been acknowledged here, but if that doesn't happen, does it mean than that the conclusions are invalid or are you just incapable of dealing with it?
If you had actually read my post you would have noticed the second paragraph, wherein is contained the secret to your apparent puzzlement.
 
As already demonstrated, one can come to a completely opposite ‘conclusions’ (basically just your own personal interpretations) by the same “actual events in our reality”. So your predetermined ‘conclusions’ “that a serious investigation makes that people eventually would come to the same conclusions” is as invalid as your predetermined “'conclusions'” being “confirmed by actual events in our reality”.

I skipped your previous post because it was split in sentences.

Could you please explain to me that an asteroid impact on Jupiter is something else than it represents?
 
I use the tetrahedronal based geometry.
You quite clearly don't understand the important words in that sentence.


It has been obvious from day 1 on.
Almost everything you say is only obvious to you.


don't blame me on this one, it should have been clear to you because it has been explained repeatedly. Do your research I would say
Do you think that if you had adequately explained anything, you would still be faced with requests for an adequate explanation?
 
Could you please explain to me that an asteroid impact on Jupiter is something else than it represents?

It represents a large planetary body with a very big gravitational field tending to draw lesser bodies into it. From what I understand, Jupiter has acted like a gravitational vacuum cleaner, keeping many such objects from entering the inner solar system. That's just a guess though, since I don't have the HD math to back it up.
 
What did you “read about Hyper Dimensional Physics back in 2003”? What makes you think you are applying “Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time”?

Well thank you for more accurately addressing my question. I can understand how one might not be happy with their understanding of reality, but just pretending you’re applying “Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time”, while it might make you happier, it certainly does not demonstrate that your “understanding of reality” has improved at all. So the 9/11 and Madrid bombing “coindedences and synchronicities” were your first?

When you were young you thought you knew it all and thought you had a skeptical mind. Unfortunately thinking you know it all shows that you in fact don’t have a skeptical mind. Then you began to “trust” you intuition, which was already wrong in making you think you knew it all and had a skeptical mind. Later you claim you began reading about “Hyper Dimensional Physics” which I suspect from your claims on this tread, had very little actually to do with Hyper Dimensional Physics. So you have come up with this HDD nonsense to help you “confirm” you intuition, that you were not happy with before and that had already failed you by getting you to think you knew it all and had a skeptical mind?

Don’t you see Dutch, instead of moving away from what you were not happy with and had failed you when you were young, your intuition. You have simply come to rely on it fully and have invented a means to simply help you confirm it for yourself. So instead of actually improving your understanding of our reality you have simply chosen to make yourself happy with your own intuition, in spite of the fact that it fails you now as it did when you were young.

I really want to give a proper reply, but its getting late and i have promissed my 2 daughters to take them to the annual village happening here tomorrow

It could take some days or maybe sunday evening, I'm off now
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom