Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
And every time we go through it you fail to grasp that it's total nonsense.
Its true that you don't seem to understand it yes
And every time we go through it you fail to grasp that it's total nonsense.
If that were actually true, as opposed to in your head, at least a few of your conclusions would have been acknowledged here.
Contrary to the often entrenched attitudes displayed by proponents od alternative thought, many here would be more than pleased if some of the ideas offered were true; their utility would be enormous and of benefit to the whole planet.
If you really believed that you would have attempted a serious investigation before now, instead of just talking about one endlessly.
Crack you up? Us? You are doing a fine job yourself Dutch. Remember you believe you can predict the future and see 'signs' in random coincidence.
Go back and read your early stuff and compare it to what you write now....notice anything?
Dutch it is quite easy - I'll take it step by step
You are self delusional
You support that delusion by making stuff up
Yes I have sorted it all out, see the two sentences above
Profounness? More like gekheid
Show the math you used to come up with this. You keep throwing around mathematical and geometric terms, so you must have some equations to post. Where are they?
That's right Dutch, nobody witnesses the airplane.....like hdd.
You do seem to be having more trouble with simple communication lately.You were not quoting the given explanations earlier in this thread as you should have done.
This is a very childish and completely unnecessary attitude.I haven't read your previous 2 posts as you are still splitting it in sentences.
So, Dutch dumps 20 posts in a row, and it's all about, he says: "I have this thought out of nowhere", he posts news stories and unsupported or unsupportable statements, and it's all true, because else, he says: "I wouldn't do this".
To top it all, he says that what he has to say is profound.
Okidoki
Is there a bit delusion of grandeur here?
I don't have a single doubt that what i am doing is to the benefit of the whole planet and the destiny of mankind.
Theo's death unveiled the hidden design, everything that has followed on this pattern has been lessened in impact and the expectations have been posted here several times. haven't you noticed? you should havePoint me to the place where you predicted Theo Van Gogh's death,and give me another prediction.
Has someone already mentioned to Dutch that something of note happens pretty much every day (it's called news), and therefore any random "time coded spiral" can look like it confirms a "pattern"?
So you agree that you don’t actually use a tetrahedron but still use the word tetrahedron? Why do you reference a specific geometrical shape that you “agree” you don’t use?
This is the point where it becomes easier to see why those with less self control tend to Godwin themselves.I mean what I say
Platonic solids are three dimensional figures.its about platonic solid geometry corresponding with orbital positions.
Ah, that's the problem. Well it would certainly explain a lot.expand your mind
we are not at the same level of thought here apparently. try to be Michio Kaku's carp that jumps out of the pool.Once again a tetrahedron is specifically a 3-dimensional shape in “our dimensional realm” that “geometry” does not remain in your HD nonsense because you never use it to begin with. Stop being simply and clearly deliberately deceptive Dutch.
Which of these do you suppose is the most likely explanation:Its true that you don't seem to understand it yes
Something which says far more about your state of mind than anything else.I don't have a single doubt that what i am doing is to the benefit of the whole planet and the destiny of mankind.
If you had actually read my post you would have noticed the second paragraph, wherein is contained the secret to your apparent puzzlement.I agree with you that my conclusions would have been acknowledged here, but if that doesn't happen, does it mean than that the conclusions are invalid or are you just incapable of dealing with it?
As already demonstrated, one can come to a completely opposite ‘conclusions’ (basically just your own personal interpretations) by the same “actual events in our reality”. So your predetermined ‘conclusions’ “that a serious investigation makes that people eventually would come to the same conclusions” is as invalid as your predetermined “'conclusions'” being “confirmed by actual events in our reality”.
You quite clearly don't understand the important words in that sentence.I use the tetrahedronal based geometry.
Almost everything you say is only obvious to you.It has been obvious from day 1 on.
Do you think that if you had adequately explained anything, you would still be faced with requests for an adequate explanation?don't blame me on this one, it should have been clear to you because it has been explained repeatedly. Do your research I would say
Could you please explain to me that an asteroid impact on Jupiter is something else than it represents?
What did you “read about Hyper Dimensional Physics back in 2003”? What makes you think you are applying “Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time”?
Well thank you for more accurately addressing my question. I can understand how one might not be happy with their understanding of reality, but just pretending you’re applying “Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time”, while it might make you happier, it certainly does not demonstrate that your “understanding of reality” has improved at all. So the 9/11 and Madrid bombing “coindedences and synchronicities” were your first?
When you were young you thought you knew it all and thought you had a skeptical mind. Unfortunately thinking you know it all shows that you in fact don’t have a skeptical mind. Then you began to “trust” you intuition, which was already wrong in making you think you knew it all and had a skeptical mind. Later you claim you began reading about “Hyper Dimensional Physics” which I suspect from your claims on this tread, had very little actually to do with Hyper Dimensional Physics. So you have come up with this HDD nonsense to help you “confirm” you intuition, that you were not happy with before and that had already failed you by getting you to think you knew it all and had a skeptical mind?
Don’t you see Dutch, instead of moving away from what you were not happy with and had failed you when you were young, your intuition. You have simply come to rely on it fully and have invented a means to simply help you confirm it for yourself. So instead of actually improving your understanding of our reality you have simply chosen to make yourself happy with your own intuition, in spite of the fact that it fails you now as it did when you were young.