Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

The quote function to enables you to see the context of a reply.

The quote with the link tells you which post is being referred to and the others let you know which section of the text is being specifically replied to. It is common practice to put all replies to one post into another single post, something which only you seem to have a problem with.

It is not a trick or an attempt to take anything out of context, on the contrary it aids coherence and comprehension and keeps posts to a manageable level.

Yes like this, limit your posts to one request or issue, its much better to read and understand. I do agree to mention where the quote is coming from but its very difficult to reply on a post which is based on replies on several other quotes. I prefer to deal with them in seperate posts because its already hard enough to follow for most

 

[Dutch]

The man:

You don't even know what those methods are. How are you fit to judge them in this instance?

Because I think so. Your test will be set up so that everybody should be able to repeat what I am doing and I have already explained to you years ago that you have to take the 'intuition' and the synchroniciyies into consideration. If you think you can set up test that are able to do so I will go for JREFF's 1 million challege instantly

 

[Dutch]

That's called confirmation bias and pareiolia. Meaningless until you prove otherwise, and your current methods are insufficient for this task.

I am aware of the fact that only continued anticipations on future developments can do the job and that's exactly what I am doing. You however, don't even want to consider the possibility and you are ignoring ALL the 'coincidenses and synchronicities that continuously emerge in the 'research'. You can think of me what you want, but you have just got a rigid mind. Try to think from this different point of perspective and you will finally understand, because even you will notice that it these instant 'confirmations' that keep on showing up can't just be coincidences.

 

[Dutch]

You sure spend a lot of time posting your predictions. Use some of that time on step 1.

posting a prediction is part of it. I barely spend time on it.

This weeks replies here on the forum takes alot of time, but readers deserve it.

I can do so because I have not that much to do at work this week, that will change from next week on

 

[Dutch]

So basically, you have no form or method, and you post things as they pop in your head?

I don't hear voices if that's what you mean. A synchronicity just occurs unexpectedly and than I just aplly the elements of HDDesign by intuition first. Or I have this thought out of nowhere and do the same.

I have had so many times that I had nothing to say at all and than suddenly something happens that initiates some sort of spin-off of related info.

How is that different than utterly random predictions?

That's exactly what I am asking you guys to do: do the same thing as me.
My 'research' will be based on HDDesign with all its contains, and yours will be based on random predictions.

You will understand the difference

 

[Dutch]

Well, the first thing I would say is "it hit Jupiter, that's quite a long way".

The second thing would be "Jupiter isn't earth and it apparently receives the most comet impacts of all the planets".

Then I would say "what part of a big rock hitting a planet 4.2 AU away could possibly be construed as an intelligently designed expression of anything earthly?"

Do you prefer to witness this expected and more than a year in advance predicted Tunguska-like event on Earth instead on Jupiter? We wouldn't be discussing it now, would we?

It was the first and so far only time that I have specificially stated in the HDDesign material that I expected a Tunguska-like event to happen around the specific timeframe. Determined more than a year in advance.

I think its the fourth time ever we humans are witnessing such an impact in space. Do you think this happens everyday in a sense that we are witnessing it? Put that on your list with random predictions for every day you guys are suppost to start with ( in order to make sense of your criticism ).

The expectation was directly determined from the Tunguska event.

If you trully understand what this is about you would understand that this impact on Jupiter is a confirmation of the 'Tungaska communications' that is taking place, as outlined in the HDDesign material.

We should take this Tunguska message very serious

 

[Dutch]

Which, as has been explained before, is utterly meaningless.

If you can't explain what you are talking about without contradicting yourself or just plain making stuff up, how do you expect anyone to understand what you are doing?

Which part was meaningless? You forgot the quote option here

 

[Dutch]

Prove to me that karma exists.No HDD crap please.

If you want me to prove it, we both have to die first

 

[Dutch]

All we've had so far are old news bulletins.Not very impressive.

determined more than a year in advance.......

What's the matter with you? Why is it, that you always ignore this?

 

[Dutch]

Look, says the mental patient, as he stretches his arms while standing on a chair while slightly bending his knees.
I am an airplane. It's true.
If I were not, I wouldn't be doing this.

The difference is that the whole world could have potentially witnessed this Jupiter Impact and nobody witnesses the airplane

Which one is true???

 

[Dutch]

A child would know you are just playing with your imaginative playthings. An adult just sees a guys making stuff up and slowly, very slowly sliding into insanity.

Dutch's nonsense continues unabated

Oh my he's associated himself with Hoaxland. Now there is a shining example of logic, reason and a prime example of

Self-delusion

Are those who are self-deluded attracted to one another?

Oh yes Dutch a question you forgot to answer - a basic contradiction in what you have claimed

You claim that HDD is non-scientific yet you are posting this on a science sub-forum...why?

Its non-scientific in terms in common accepted science.

No doubt it will be somehow part of our future scientific understanding.
But I have already posted it here in the thread that it doesn't matter if you want this removed to another section of the forum.

 

[Dutch]

The man:

I don't think you understand a tetrahedron. What I am referring to is that your “given explanation” and evident calculations do not in fact involve a tetrahedron.

But The Man, I agree with you.........I've told you they don't look at all like a Tetrahedron, in fact they don't have shape at all

 

[Dutch]

Originally Posted by The Man :

When exactly did you start this HDD ‘research’ Dutch? What I mean is what was the first news story that got you looking for some synchronicity as a contributing factor. That might tell us a lot.

You say you started 20 years ago, that puts it at about 1990, then you refer to 9/11/2001, 11 years later.

Aha, now I know what you mean. I think I have to clarify about this 20 years. When I was at age 25 I was not happy about my understanding of reality and from that age on I really wanted to know what life's about.

For years I read several books a week about alot of non-fiction subjects, including science, religion, ( para) psychology, philosophy, ancient past, etc. Only the last 7 years I used the internet too. My point of view has been changed over the years. When I was young I thought I knew it all and I had a very skeptical mind, very rational but also, as appeared later on, very limited. I began to understand that I should also trust intuitive knowledge.
When I began to read about Hyper Dimensional Physics back in 2003 I was very curious. I had this idea to apply this Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time and from then on, this HDDesign 'research' was ongoing. It really changed the way I looked at reality and when I noticed that all these coindedences and synchronicities emerged in the material I began to understand that I was dealing with very profound and fundamental knowledge.
I understood that with specific knowledge comes specific responsibilities, so I decided to share the material ( from 2004 on).

 

[Dutch]

A tetrahedron is specifically a “3 dimensional shape” that you don’t want it to have a “3 dimensional shape in” your “reality” is just your problem and again confirms that your “Tetrahedron based timecoded spiral” involves neither a tetrahedron nor a spiral.

The tetrhedronal geometry is the only thing that remains when a HD Tetrahedron is 'translated' in to our dimensional realm, corresponding with specific orbital positions ( as determined as a specific number of rotations in an orbit of a planet for instance). We have gone through that The Man.

 

[Dutch]

Don’t you understand your assertion before about “The people who we have chosen to lead us” and now about “The karma is played out” are irrelevant? Once again your presumption is that “we ARE responsible” by “karma” and you simply infer that since things happen it is due to your “karma” and thus “we ARE responsible” by “karma”. It’s called circular reasoning Dutch, as well as begging the question.

That's because your thinking stops with 'I didn't pull the trigger in Srebrenica'

In order to understand you have to think deeper than 'linear cause and effect' line of thoughts

You have to think about these issues from another point of view

 

[Dutch]

Dutch your “conclusion” was predetermined by your presumption. That others do not take the same presumption does not mean they aren’t open minded or don’t take time to investigate . That is called the no true Scotsman fallacy.

My 'conclusions' are confirmed by actual events in our reality, for each and everyone to review as everything is logged. I say that a serious investigation makes that people eventually would come to the same conclusions based on the same available material: that its valid

 

[Dutch]

Yes he does like the big word babble. I have noted that over the years his ability to communicate effectively has declined. Less able to handle the stress of supporting an unsuportable position. In otherwords he's starting to crack up.

Which stress?

The only thing that has changed is that I have increased my understanding of this HDdesign concept, so its inevitable that differences between you and me increased aswell.

You don't actually think you guys can crack me up, do you?

 

[Dutch]

Howdy RP

Not at all!

Having seen Dutch's spamming on multiple boards with same bombastic materials I note to new posters that they are wasting their time and will not be getting any straight answers. He is - unfortunately the intellectual equivalent of an Uncle Remus tar baby.

As someone interested in fringe thought. I find Dutch's slow decline interests me and I check his multiple threads to see his slow disintegration.

Kinda like reading about failed political, scientific and military ideas- a study in the human ability to support to the end doomed concepts.

funny guy, you just can't deal with me and the implications of this HDdesign material, so now you are talking as if you've all sorted it out.
The profoundness of what I am saying is only increasing but you just keep on closing your eyes for it.

 

[Paul]

? I meant if they vote or not.

So taking action is irrelevant?

You don't have to vote in order to care about something.

No you don't, especially if you can't cast a vote to influence the process. However, what if you care and can vote and do vote and still something happens?

These 'dark' expressions are happening because they 'reflect' what we really are in our deepest essence.

So every time someone dies, they are being karmically punished for their deepest essence?

We are making the same mistakes over and over again because we think we have nothing to do with it.

No.

You are apparently guilty about everything because you feel unaccountably responsible for events far beyond your slightest influence.

We are co-creating these expressions and we can all equally contribute to a more 'subtle' reality

Patent nonsense.

Everybody can make this difference, not only with what you do, but also how you think about it and what we feel. A 'better' reality starts with our own contribution.

Please don't insult the rest of us by projecting your delusions onto other people.

A very small minority of people are responsible for the kind of events you are obsessed with and most people, at the very least, are opposed the their actions.

 

[Paul]

Nor did Pim Fortuyn or Theo van Gogh in your line of thought, but they were both assassinated

What?

Nor did they not stop something they couldn't?

What secret warning do think underlies these two killings? And I don't mean some nebulous idea about being subtle.

They were 'caught by surprise' because we were unaware of the underlying themes that were to find expression.

I would imagine being murdered does tend to catch you by surprise.

The objective is to make our reality more subtle, so by identifying the underlying themes in advance, the 'high impact' expression will be transferred into a nore subtle one

Name one time this has happened.

Instead of being killed, an alternative 'security issue' will find its way to express ( which actually did happen at least 8 times in a row with Obama as explained here in this thread)

You only mentioned these no-security issues with Obama after they had happened, which means that there could be no preventive action to moderate the karma.