Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

No we don’t, it is good that you feel some sorrow and empathy for this tragic event, but simply unhealthy that you feel some specific responsibility (evidently lacking any) and apparently some need to pass that responsibility on to others who not only clearly had no indolent but might have actual been the opposition to both those “chosen to lead us” and this very decision. You paint with a very broad brush in an attempt to cover everyone with some stain you feel.

Yes we do have a shared responsibility, that's what the patterns unveil.

You should come to the same conclusion if you really took the time to investigate and open up your mind

 

[Dutch]

And the nonsense continues - going for 7 years of self delusion!!!

I didn't knew you were a kid

 

[The Man]

For instance: that Theo van Gogh was killed on the 911 - HD Tetrahedron based timecoded spiral was a 'confirmation' of the hidden underlying pattern.
The understanding that this has to do with Srebrenia karma being played out is something else, that took me more than a year to find out , after continued monitoring of the hidden underlying patterns.

That still only confirms that there is nothing hyper-dimensional in your calculations and that your purported confirmation is based simply on your bias to your own one dimensional “time coded” interpretation. As it would take three dimensions for you to actually utilize a, well, “spiral”. Please show us these (at least) three dimensional “Tetrahedron based” “spiral” calculations.

If I say for instance that based on the applied elements of HDDesign that the health of the Pope is at stake around a specific future timeframe and when that day comes the Pope is hospitalizes, not once but several times as mentioned in the material, than it is only showing up for me?

Yep, old guy has failing health, amazing prediction. Perhaps you forgot to include the tendency to a downward spiraling of ones health as they age in your 'hyper-dimensional' calculations that evidently do not even include even the dimensions of a, well, spiral?

There are numerous examples in the HDDesign material. You just refuse to accept the possibility and each correlation is dismissed as a coincidence.

No, it is dismissed as your deliberate intention, that you "just refuse to accept".

I repeat: do try this yourselves, not based on HDDesign but just randomly. YTou guys can help eachother. Very soon you will notice yuo have failed

I repeat, we already have given directly conflicting interpretations of your same “synchronicities”, all remain equally as useless.

Bit its what the patterns are showing, so...

Bit of what? People, you do not and can not know? Your premise is that a lot of uncaring people cause bad things to happen. You observe that bad things happen, thus you conclude that there must be a lot of uncaring people. Yet your own assertion in not knowing just me, demonstrates the fallacy of you initial premise and thus your predetermined conclusion.


It is up to you, you can keep replying to my posts in some disjoint fashion (different segments of the same post in different replies) if it suits your, evidently ,disjoint thinking. However, I will still reply, not in bits in different posts, but trying to maintain some coherent response.

 

[The Man]

I would suppose nothing more than that Dutch can add up a tillslip from the grocerystore.
Anything else is likely wishfull thinking for him.

Hey, why should Dutch be the only one with fantasies? I would like nothing better than he actually knew what he was talking about.

 

[Dutch]

Evidently 20 years by his own assertion, only 7 on the internet.




Tetrahedron? A 3 dimensional pyramidal solid having four planes? Where is the Hyper-dimensionality in that? I suppose you calculated the intersections of such a 3 dimensional solid with that of some orbit in at least a 3 dimensional space? Perhaps you just divided, multiplied, used four or three to calculate in a singular dimension (based on the sidereal period of some orbit) to get your 1 dimensional numerological “synchronicity”?

As these events you cite are (at least) some 11 (14 on the outside) years after you claim to have begun your ‘research’ it does not answer the question I asked. Unless it took you 11 years to find your first “synchronicity” in some news events?


On a side note “indolent” in my pervious post should have been “involvement“. That’s what I get for not checking the spell check. Though, had I put “indolence”, that would have been better.

I don't think I understand your questions here. The determination of a HD Tetrahedron has been discussed here but I don't think you are referring to the given explanation. I am lost on your 11 years remark in relation to my 'research'.

 

[Dutch]

Dutch, you've "demonstrated" your idea repeatedly, could you explain to me how it functions?

First there's an intuitive thought or a synchronicity, than a described element of HDDesign is applied ( still mainly based on intuition, there's no fixed way to deal with it) and the outcome should give somekind of confirmation of connectedness instantly. This way hidden patterns may emerge which can be monitored so hidden underlying themes can be identified.

 

[Dutch]

There is no such thing as karma.

I do understand you think so, I have had such a rigid mind too 20 years ago

 

[Dutch]

So you are going to break the habit of a lifetime and reply in a coherent manner?

Probably not in the way you expect. I can only explain this without limitations

 

[Dutch]

You too Paul, don't split my posts into sentences and put them out of context. Make your point in a seperate post and I will reply

 

[Dutch]

There's nothing subtle about assassinating the POTUS.

What do you mean, what's POTUS?

 

[Dutch]

No, you can't show anything.
"They" "happen" in your head, nowhere else. That you are doing "this" is clearly not evidence that those "'coincidenses' and synchronicities" are happening.

Look, says the mental patient, as he stretches his arms while standing on a chair while slightly bending his knees.
I am an airplane. It's true.
If I were not, I wouldn't be doing this.

If I expect an event to happen that expresses the underlying theme of a cometary ( or asteroid) impact from out of space ( which is Tunguska) more than a year in advance and when that timeframe comes we are witnessing a cometary impact ( or asteroid) on Jupiter than it happens only in my mind?

Your reference to a mental patient only unveils your lack of development

 

[Mister Earl]

First there's an intuitive thought or a synchronicity, than a described element of HDDesign is applied ( still mainly based on intuition, there's no fixed way to deal with it) and the outcome should give somekind of confirmation of connectedness instantly. This way hidden patterns may emerge which can be monitored so hidden underlying themes can be identified.

I've asked Dutch to lay out his prediction creation process years ago. This is as close as you'll ever get, and it is utterly meaningless. He'll spend all day and all night making a plethora of random predictions, but will absolutely refuse to fully explain his process (or even the terms he's invented ) so that others can test it. Instead, he expects us to take his own "testing" at face value. I've spent quite a bit of time trying to explain that that isn't sufficient. Sadly, testing "HDD" has never even gotten to step one. I'd even go so far as to predict it never will.

 

[Dutch]

Dutch, your diametrically opposed statements about "instant rational understanding.", which The Man quoted earlier, show how little value your words have.

instant rational understanding of the pattern yes ( that means mathematically etc.). That's something else than undersanding what the unveiled hidden underlying design actually implies

This is what you get when you quote out of context

 

[Dutch]

If I say for instance that based on the applied elements of sheep'zzz bleating, that I will be standing on the north rim of crater Copernicus on the Moon, at a specific time in the future, and when that day comes I find myself standing there, than it's just in my head?

No, in that case you have apparently ( subconsciously) understood how reality works and your intuitive insights were valid ( altough everybody would say you are insane)

So maybe you should 'research' sheep'zzz bleating and find out if indeed these confirmations show up. I know it does in this HDDesign 'research' so I will stick with HDDesign

 

[Paul]

I repeat: do try this yourselves, not based on HDDesign but just randomly. YTou guys can help eachother. Very soon you will notice yuo have failed

We would expect to fail, you on the other hand want to succeed so much that you will believe anything is relevant and then rework your method to allow this.

 

[Dutch]

That still only confirms that there is nothing hyper-dimensional in your calculations and that your purported confirmation is based simply on your bias to your own one dimensional “time coded” interpretation. As it would take three dimensions for you to actually utilize a, well, “spiral”. Please show us these (at least) three dimensional “Tetrahedron based” “spiral” calculations.

They don't have 3 dimensional shape in our reality, only the correlating orbital positions remain as explained before

 

[Paul]

Sigh.....don't you understand this is irrelevant? The karma is played out as identified, showing us that we ARE responsible. The problem is that most of us are way to rigid to even consider the possibility

So any actually possibility of a genuine chance of real responsibility is irrelevant?

Do please explain how this wonderful karma of yours seeks to ascribe blame to people who could in no way have had any influence on the outcome of events for which they may not have even had the first clue about the possibility of existence.

 

[Paul]

What do you mean, what's POTUS?

The President of the United States of America, that guy you think should probably be shot for not stopping something he couldn't influence.

 

[Dutch]

'bit' was a typo, should be 'this'

 

[Paul]

You too Paul, don't split my posts into sentences and put them out of context. Make your point in a seperate post and I will reply

The quote function to enables you to see the context of a reply.

The quote with the link tells you which post is being referred to and the others let you know which section of the text is being specifically replied to. It is common practice to put all replies to one post into another single post, something which only you seem to have a problem with.

It is not a trick or an attempt to take anything out of context, on the contrary it aids coherence and comprehension and keeps posts to a manageable level.