dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
I know, you are not the only one. That's why this Srebrenica karma finding its way pretty harsh.
There is no such thing as karma.
I know, you are not the only one. That's why this Srebrenica karma finding its way pretty harsh.
Mr Earl,
Make your point in a seperate post please, don't cut my posts in lines and give comments, I can't hardly reply in a coherent manner this way.
I don't know Dutch.
On the 6 th of july you posted an "enabler" for your faith: Hirsi Ali and Obama being assasinated would "express 'srebrenica karma'". Or, the other way around, would "make" hdd "valid".
Like with other faith based stuff, the divine power never actually manifests, so a believer -at his/her own initiative- will act on behalve of that divine power.
Are/were you being incitive?
It's curious then, that you are the only one who does this and sees all these tortuously linked indications.There's no endless seeking for articles on the internet, I just read the mainstream news as everybody else.
It seems that the simple facts need to pointed out to you again. There was no security threat to Obama. All the events you claimed have been discussed individually and their circumstances explained clearly.What about "Obama security threat"?
I have talked about 'Obama security issues' as discussed several times before here. I even had to relist them here a while back, so what are you referring to?
Why would you need someone else to supply data to pick from if everything is intelligently laid out for you?If I don't see the connection with an event than somebody else will and share it
I presume you're aware that sentence doesn't actually mean anything.or a synchronicity shows up with the expected expression of the underlying theme
Funny that you don't take the time to mention those cases, preferring to wait years to find something to desperately shoehorn in.On very few occasions I have had this feeling that there was nothing at all, but in those cases it takes a while to become clear
What use is waiting three years to make you usual tenuous "it was published on that day in that country so it means something" claims?That same article he picked showed up almost 3 years later as another confirmation.
Dutch, all "this stuff" is "happening" only in your head. Only you can "see" "it".
Not even your wife can "see" "it". It's a personal thing.
There's nothing subtle about assassinating the POTUS.As with everything else I say: the objective is to enable subtle expressions instead of high impact
That's not true is it?No, you fail to see it. If those 'coincidenses' and synchronicities wouldn't happen, I wouldn't do this
As with everything else I say: the objective is to enable subtle expressions instead of high impact
How do you get “confirmation” without understanding? Still after 4 weeks you have yet to address the substantial portions of my post concerning simply rationalizing vs. coming to some rational understanding critically.
No, you fail to see it. If those 'coincidenses' and synchronicities wouldn't happen, I wouldn't do this
Dutch they are your “HDDEsign” “elements” you apply them however you see fit to specifically get your synchronicities. That they “show up” for you, being at your beck and call, somehow seems to amaze only you., it’s all just you, but you just don’t want to see that and that’s the only issue here.
...
I suppose you calculated the intersections of such a 3 dimensional solid with that of some orbit in at least a 3 dimensional space? Perhaps you just divided, multiplied, used four or three to calculate in a singular dimension (based on the sidereal period of some orbit) to get your 1 dimensional numerological “synchronicity”?
...
I take full responsibility for my actions or lack of action, I don’t need you or anyone as a scapegoat.
How about you, Dutch?
I submit that you also do not know “most people” “in person”, so your broad condemnation of people you don’t and can not know lays a lot of that ‘nasty karma’ right a your feet.
Bit its what the patterns are showing, so...
If I say for instance that based on the applied elements of HDDesign that the health of the Pope is at stake around a specific future timeframe and when that day comes the Pope is hospitalizes, not once but several times as mentioned in the material, than it is only showing up for me?
...
The former I would say would be beneficial to everyone, the latter not. Dutch we have already demonstrated that your “HDDesign concept” support directly conflicting interpretations equally well, therefore it supports no particular interpretation. It is by all practical means and definitions useless except in taking up some of your time and perhaps helping your read certain news events. Both of which I would not say are particularly bad things.
Dutch it has not unveiled to you your rather obvious “responsibilities” in both creating your own “synchronicities” and your own interpretation of the meaning you give them. The implications being that you just remain in that dark about your own direct involvement in determining these particular things you think “people should care about for the benefit of their personal- and our collective consciousness”
Who chose these people to lead “us”? Does everyone vote? Does everyone get to vote? Does everyone who gets to vote and does vote actually vote for whomever won?