Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr Earl,

Make your point in a seperate post please, don't cut my posts in lines and give comments, I can't hardly reply in a coherent manner this way.

So you are going to break the habit of a lifetime and reply in a coherent manner?
 
I don't know Dutch.

On the 6 th of july you posted an "enabler" for your faith: Hirsi Ali and Obama being assasinated would "express 'srebrenica karma'". Or, the other way around, would "make" hdd "valid".

Like with other faith based stuff, the divine power never actually manifests, so a believer -at his/her own initiative- will act on behalve of that divine power.

Are/were you being incitive?

As with everything else I say: the objective is to enable subtle expressions instead of high impact
 
There's no endless seeking for articles on the internet, I just read the mainstream news as everybody else.
It's curious then, that you are the only one who does this and sees all these tortuously linked indications.


What about "Obama security threat"?

I have talked about 'Obama security issues' as discussed several times before here. I even had to relist them here a while back, so what are you referring to?
It seems that the simple facts need to pointed out to you again. There was no security threat to Obama. All the events you claimed have been discussed individually and their circumstances explained clearly.


If I don't see the connection with an event than somebody else will and share it
Why would you need someone else to supply data to pick from if everything is intelligently laid out for you?


or a synchronicity shows up with the expected expression of the underlying theme
I presume you're aware that sentence doesn't actually mean anything.

It's like the disclaimers on TV cosmetics adverts - "gives the appearance of a mild lifting effect"


On very few occasions I have had this feeling that there was nothing at all, but in those cases it takes a while to become clear
Funny that you don't take the time to mention those cases, preferring to wait years to find something to desperately shoehorn in.


Speaking of which-
That same article he picked showed up almost 3 years later as another confirmation.
What use is waiting three years to make you usual tenuous "it was published on that day in that country so it means something" claims?
 
Dutch, all "this stuff" is "happening" only in your head. Only you can "see" "it".
Not even your wife can "see" "it". It's a personal thing.

No, you fail to see it. If those 'coincidenses' and synchronicities wouldn't happen, I wouldn't do this
 
No, you fail to see it. If those 'coincidenses' and synchronicities wouldn't happen, I wouldn't do this
That's not true is it?

We've just been given an example of you waiting 3 years to find something you could claim as a hit.
 
How do you get “confirmation” without understanding? Still after 4 weeks you have yet to address the substantial portions of my post concerning simply rationalizing vs. coming to some rational understanding critically.

For instance: that Theo van Gogh was killed on the 911 - HD Tetrahedron based timecoded spiral was a 'confirmation' of the hidden underlying pattern.
The understanding that this has to do with Srebrenia karma being played out is something else, that took me more than a year to find out , after continued monitoring of the hidden underlying patterns.
 
No, you fail to see it. If those 'coincidenses' and synchronicities wouldn't happen, I wouldn't do this

No, you can't show anything.
"They" "happen" in your head, nowhere else. That you are doing "this" is clearly not evidence that those "'coincidenses' and synchronicities" are happening.

Look, says the mental patient, as he stretches his arms while standing on a chair while slightly bending his knees.
I am an airplane. It's true.
If I were not, I wouldn't be doing this.
 
Dutch they are your “HDDEsign” “elements” you apply them however you see fit to specifically get your synchronicities. That they “show up” for you, being at your beck and call, somehow seems to amaze only you., it’s all just you, but you just don’t want to see that and that’s the only issue here.

If I say for instance that based on the applied elements of HDDesign that the health of the Pope is at stake around a specific future timeframe and when that day comes the Pope is hospitalizes, not once but several times as mentioned in the material, than it is only showing up for me?

There are numerous examples in the HDDesign material. You just refuse to accept the possibility and each correlation is dismissed as a coincidence.

I repeat: do try this yourselves, not based on HDDesign but just randomly. YTou guys can help eachother. Very soon you will notice yuo have failed
 
...
I suppose you calculated the intersections of such a 3 dimensional solid with that of some orbit in at least a 3 dimensional space? Perhaps you just divided, multiplied, used four or three to calculate in a singular dimension (based on the sidereal period of some orbit) to get your 1 dimensional numerological “synchronicity”?
...

I would suppose nothing more than that Dutch can add up a tillslip from the grocerystore.
Anything else is likely wishfull thinking for him.
 
I take full responsibility for my actions or lack of action, I don’t need you or anyone as a scapegoat.

How about you, Dutch?

Its not about actions only, this is about expressions of consciousness

What you think and even what you feel is just as important
 
I submit that you also do not know “most people” “in person”, so your broad condemnation of people you don’t and can not know lays a lot of that ‘nasty karma’ right a your feet.

Bit its what the patterns are showing, so...
 
Dutch, your diametrically opposed statements about "instant rational understanding.", which The Man quoted earlier, show how little value your words have.
 
If I say for instance that based on the applied elements of HDDesign that the health of the Pope is at stake around a specific future timeframe and when that day comes the Pope is hospitalizes, not once but several times as mentioned in the material, than it is only showing up for me?
...

If I say for instance that based on the applied elements of sheep'zzz bleating, that I will be standing on the north rim of crater Copernicus on the Moon, at a specific time in the future, and when that day comes I find myself standing there, than it's just in my head?
 
Last edited:
The former I would say would be beneficial to everyone, the latter not. Dutch we have already demonstrated that your “HDDesign concept” support directly conflicting interpretations equally well, therefore it supports no particular interpretation. It is by all practical means and definitions useless except in taking up some of your time and perhaps helping your read certain news events. Both of which I would not say are particularly bad things.

No you have not demonstrated. You can do so by trying to do the same thing and compare it with my 'research' based on HDDesign.

Do it for an extended period of time

You will not succeed
 
Dutch it has not unveiled to you your rather obvious “responsibilities” in both creating your own “synchronicities” and your own interpretation of the meaning you give them. The implications being that you just remain in that dark about your own direct involvement in determining these particular things you think “people should care about for the benefit of their personal- and our collective consciousness”

Synchronicities just happen, they aren't ( consciously ) created.
As the correlations are all shared when they show up, everybody can make up their own interpretations. I share mine based on continued monitoring.
 
Who chose these people to lead “us”? Does everyone vote? Does everyone get to vote? Does everyone who gets to vote and does vote actually vote for whomever won?

Sigh.....don't you understand this is irrelevant? The karma is played out as identified, showing us that we ARE responsible. The problem is that most of us are way to rigid to even consider the possibility
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom