Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
So you’re simply going to continue to spam this forum with your dimensional design hype nonsense?

By the way how’s that reply coming along?

you mean this request I guess:


Well it certainly seems to me like it is a religion for you, though I’ll easily agree with the ‘not about science’ part. The latter assertions clearly fail and the insistence that your intuition is “intuitive knowledge that must give an instant rational understanding” certainly goes to your religious like conviction to your intuitive musings. Clearly it is more of just you rationalizing your purportedly “intuitive knowledge” than giving it any critical “rational understanding” (instant or otherwise).

I'm not talking about instant rational understanding, I talk about instant confirmation ( by event, synchronicity or intelligent correlation ). That's something else than 'understanding.
 
You know, skimming through Dutch's wall o' texts here on the forum, I notice that there is quite a bit of violence.

Violence by nature, violence between people, up until nuclear violence. The violence Dutch talks about seems to be in the context of a 'warning'.
It's almost as if he is inclined to change people's behaviour with the threat of violence.

Has anyone else noticed this?

Yes, I did
 
Yep, the threat violence and the inference of guilt, particularly for the violence that has already befallen others that you should feel guilty for (as he evidently does) even though you might not have had anything to do with it.

So how about it Dutch, what’s with all the violence and guilt?

That's a very good question to start with. Its especially these 'dark' expressions in our reality that bare the fingerprints of hidden underlying design. They reflect the state of our ( collective ) consciousness.

Its our 'I don't care less' mentality that enables these expressions.

What do you about guilt? The hidden patterns unveil the connectedness though
 
Oh my an incoherent mess of raw brain masturbation, LOL

I along with a number of other people are awaiting answer to previous questions...Dutch?

Is this your new strategy - putting out masses of crap and hoping no one will take the time to sort it out?

LOL

Further note except for some phrases for JREF a lot of this material is copied from similar posts he placed elsewhere on the web

One such as here:http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1059186913

I post on dozens forums, you know that. I reply on all these forums differently, so what is the point. I share a development based on the HDDesign research in order to show the validity of this stuff, this is the only way to show to you that there's more to this than just coincidences
 
When exactly did you start this HDD ‘research’ Dutch? What I mean is what was the first news story that got you looking for some synchronicity as a contributing factor. That might tell us a lot.

I guess about 20 years ago. I'm posting on the internet since 2003.
I called it 'hyper dimensional Design research' in 2004. ( as reference to the Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron as first determined based on platonic solid geometry, unveiling the orbital postions of 9/11 and the Madrid bombings)
 
I post on dozens forums,

Hans: Might we call that 'spamming'?



Hans: You've already admitted its not scientific so why are you posting this in a science sub forum?


, this is the only way to show to you that there's more to this than just coincidences

Hans: Nope you need to explain your criteria and make specific predictions.


Nobody has taken the bait there. by Dadfyyd

I think you'll find that in a number of cases - incoherence is not attractive


Here is a good example of Dutch BS

Mount St. Helens/Yellowstone is expected for around HD Cube timeframe in November this year. That means EQ or volcanic activity, high impact or subtle.

I too could make this prediction - the key phrase is, 'in November' and the key word is 'subtle'.......That is 100% certain to happen - ah Dutch what is the point of making such silly comments?
 
Last edited:
I called it 'hyper dimensional Design research' in 2004. ( as reference to the Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron as first determined based on platonic solid geometry, unveiling the orbital postions of 9/11 and the Madrid bombings)

Dutch, does this have anything to do with Richard C. Hoagland's "work"? I had thought the HD part of what you are doing was just a coincidence, but now that you are mentioning tetrahedrons (Hoagland's favorite platonic solid) I wonder.
 
...
to show the validity of this stuff, this is the only way to show to you that there's more to this than just coincidences

There really is no "this stuff", outside the confines of your brain.
The "this stuff" is misunderstood by you to have any relevance in the real world.
This is why you are unable to actually show anything at all.

We talked about this before, Marcel. Remember?
 
you mean this request I guess:

What request? That was just a series of statements to which you replied...

Dutch said:
Well it certainly seems to me like it is a religion for you, though I’ll easily agree with the ‘not about science’ part. The latter assertions clearly fail and the insistence that your intuition is “intuitive knowledge that must give an instant rational understanding” certainly goes to your religious like conviction to your intuitive musings. Clearly it is more of just you rationalizing your purportedly “intuitive knowledge” than giving it any critical “rational understanding” (instant or otherwise).

This one I'm going to reply on later this week because I have to go now






I'm not talking about instant rational understanding, I talk about instant confirmation ( by event, synchronicity or intelligent correlation ). That's something else than 'understanding.


Well you certainly were talking about “instant rational understanding” before.

Its not really about religion, its not really about science, its intuitive knowledge that must give an instant rational understanding.


So that’s it? After almost 4 weeks your “reply” is that you were just “not talking about” what your wrote?

Did you suffer some traumatic brain injury in those 4 weeks that not only caused you to forget about claiming you would reply but also what you said that I had replied to, quoted in my reply and you also quoted me quoting these almost 4 weeks later?


That's a very good question to start with. Its especially these 'dark' expressions in our reality that bare the fingerprints of hidden underlying design. They reflect the state of our ( collective ) consciousness.

No Dutch, they only bare your fingerprints and evidently only reflect the state of your unconsciousness as you apparently are still not yet consciously aware of your own determination of your Purported synchronicities.

Its our 'I don't care less' mentality that enables these expressions.

So you are just trying to pawn off your own guilt onto others?

What do you about guilt?

“What do” I what “about guilt?”

Your question is incomplete.

However what I don’t do about my own feelings of guilt is simply try to pawn them off onto others or claim it was due to some undefined “'I don't care less' mentality” as opposed to just my own actions or inaction that resulted in some feeling of guilt. Certainly if I had an “'I don't care less' mentality”, I wouldn’t have any feelings of guilt. Also if I just ascribed those things I am guilty of or feel guilty for to some “'I don't care less' mentality” of others then how could I feel guilty as I’m not the one with the “'I don't care less' mentality”?


Should I and everyone else take a concerted interest an active engagement in your personal life or would you prefer the rest of us maintain an 'I don't care less' mentality in that regard? Does this not enable these 'dark' expressions you mention to invade your personal life? Perhaps you feel us invading your personal life to be a “'dark' expressions” in itself. That one couldn’t care less is not always a bad thing Dutch, there are plenty of things people as a whole shouldn’t care about at all.

Let’s take one of your own examples, the Srebrenica massacre. How many of those people do you think would have been killed if the Serbs couldn’t care less about the religious and ethnic background of anyone? Certainly it was something they cared far too much about even to the exclusion of the humanity of those killed. It’s a two way street Dutch, they couldn’t have cared less about the humanity of those killed specifically because they cared too much about their religious and ethnic background. Don’t be as naive as them and don’t try to posit whatever guilt you may personally feel onto others.



I don't care less how you call it, but the indications of hidden underlying Design in our 'familiar' dimensions should be clear

Oops, more enabling of those “'dark' expressions in our reality” by you Dutch.


The hidden patterns unveil the connectedness though

Indeed, as the hidden patterns of you simply trying to assuage your own feelings of guilt by asserting some “( collective ) consciousness” and “'I don't care less' mentality” that “enables these” “'dark' expressions’”. Take responsibility for your own fingerprints hidden in your “underlying design” as well as for your own feelings, whether they be guilt, remorse, happiness or even indifference instead of just trying to pawn them off to the “mentality” of others. They reflect your mentality Dutch.
 
Last edited:
Just to derail for a second,my name is spelled Dafydd,it´s Welsh for David,pronounced Da-vith.
 
Hey Dafydd sorry about that extra 'd' I seem to be haunted by specious 'd's
 
I believe he has mentioned his work before, and not in the usual 'that guy Hoagland is an idiot' way.

Interesting. From what I know of Hoagland's work, I wouldn't think Dutch would find it very useful. The two different strains of "research" do not seem to mesh well. Of course I'm not sure what it is exactly that Dutch is doing (except perhaps putting us on) so it is tough to tell.
 
Nobody has taken the bait there.

I was posting on the previous David Icke forum too, before its collapsed. Back then it wasn't much of a discussion thread too because most preferred to read it and try to understand. However there were comments on that thread, also from people who said that the HDDesign material was the only relevant info on David Icke's site!!

Readers rank it with 5 stars overthere, so what is your point?
 
Hans:
Here is a good example of Dutch BS



Mount St. Helens/Yellowstone is expected for around HD Cube timeframe in November this year. That means EQ or volcanic activity, high impact or subtle.



I too could make this prediction - the key phrase is, 'in November' and the key word is 'subtle'.......That is 100% certain to happen - ah Dutch what is the point of making such silly comments?

The expectation was made years ago in 2004 and logged in the material.

I expect volcano/seismic activity on the Hyper Dimensional Cube location Mount St. Helens - Yellowstone during Hyper Dimensional Cube timeframe around November 17, 2010

Mount st. Helens is located at 46.2 degrees North latitude, 122.8 West Longtitude, very close to the perfect HD Cube latitude of 45 degrees.

a volcano is fixed in the solid outer crust but due to continental drift the volcano could have been 'moved' through time, compared to the 'perfect' Hyperdimensional spot. Due to Earth's rotation, a fixed point on the solid crust at Northern Hemisphere will drift to the North and to the West.
In a sense, St helens could be seen as the easiest way out at the HD Cube for a an extended period of time, but that St. Helens is off the perfect HD Cube spot.
The same process at work can be seen when looking at the islands of Hawaii.
Through time, the outer crust drifted over the perfect Tetrahedronal location of 19.47 degrees latitude, creating a chain of islands as we see today.
So if we recalculate the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens, we have to reverse the continental drift so to speek and we should look for seismic activities at the aprox. location of 45 degrees North Latitude and with a Longtitude East of 122,8 West on Northern Hemisphere:

YELLOWSTONE

Yellowstone is Located around 45 degrees North and 110 West Longtitude, perfectly fitting the reversed continental drift, closer to the calculted HD Cube spot ( based on the above estimates).
So Mt. st Helens and Yellowstone could be related and St' Helens activities could be an indication something is up at yellowstone, the creation of a new volcano near the HD Cube interference spot?

That is what is potentially out there

I identified the 'when' of this potential event also years ago and the 'confirmation' is rather personal.

With 'high impact' I mean the creation of a new volcano at yellowstone around November 17, 2010. With a 'subtle expression' I mean everything less than that, as long as its clear to the observer that it is related to this potential yellowstone activity.
 
Dutch, does this have anything to do with Richard C. Hoagland's "work"? I had thought the HD part of what you are doing was just a coincidence, but now that you are mentioning tetrahedrons (Hoagland's favorite platonic solid) I wonder.

Yes, Hoagland's "work" and HDDesign are complementary. The difference is that HDDesign applies Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time and unveils the hidden underlying Design in our reality.

I tried to get in contact with Richard several times but that doesn't work from here over the internet. I would like to meet him in person though, I think we have alot to talk about
 
So, you noticed that you seem to have an inclination to try change people's behaviour with the threat of violence.

Does your issue with violence extend beyond your online persona?

No

and it wasn't me who did the Tunguska thing:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom