Hyper Dimensional Design

[The Man]

I think the 'pre-emptive strike' issue was on the table around the Venus Transit timeframe. If they ( = those who would like to carry out such an attack ) decided to do so we will find out soon enough. If they decided to postpone or dismiss it it will also become clear later on that it has been decided to do so around this Venus Transit timeframe.

So it really doesn't matter what happens Dutch, you will simply find a way to make it fit "around" your “timeframe“.

We will have to see who will give 'expression' to this underlying theme

As exemplified above “who will give 'expression' to this underlying theme” is, as always, simply you.

 

[Blue Mountain]

I want to remind you that I don't do scientific research, but 'research' in a way that I listen to intuition and synchronicities first apply the elements of HDDesign and the correlations show up instantly. I have said it a dozen times here that this HDDesign 'research' isn't a normal scientific research

Any research that is not conducted with scientific rigour is flawed and eventually useless. Heck, a lot of scientific research turns out to be useless, too, but the reason we realize it's useless is because it was conducted in a scientific fashion.

as a matter of fact there are hundreds if not thousands confirmations to find in the material, which you will probably all dismiss as nonsense.

In a world where six billion human beings are interacting each and every day, even coincidences with a staggeringly small chance of happening will occur.

HDDesign is unveiling the deepest underlying themes we have to deal with in the times we live in.

Strange, I don't see very many references in the material to AGW, overpopulation, and the increasingly unsustainable usage of the earth's resources.

Also, most of the answers are already present in the material but have yet to 'fall in coherence' so to speak. As time goes on it will increasingly become clear why specific developments in our reality happen on a specific moment in our perception of time and how these events are connected to the deeper underlying themes.

On other words, you need more time to amass yet more material and find even more "coincidences." That approach could fail you completely: you'll have so much material that whatever clarity you hoped to gain would be lost in the noise.

Dutch, the big difference between your hobby (HDD) and mine (writing neat little computer programs) is I don't believe my hobby is going to reveal the deep secrets about our reality. The people working at the LHC have a much better chance of doing that than you or I do.

 

[Daylightstar]

you asked for an explanation and there you can find it

easy

No. I did not ask for an explanation.
I requested full documentation of a geometrical transformation/translation of a hyper dimensional platonic solid into geometrically determined orbital positions of an orbiting planet.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5988900&postcount=2855

You were being untruthful in saying it was in this thread. Your general referral to your own forum constitutes an admission of this.

If it is indeed in your own forum, please provide a link to a post or posts in your forum where you detail this documentation.

I am not going to go through your whole, extremely convoluted forum, to look for something for which you are unwilling to provide a direct link and which most likely isn't there, considering your lack of coöperativeness until now.

If it is there, please provide a link.

 

[Paul]

You should monitor the timelines, notice WHEN the underlying themes are posted and HOW they are connected to the underlying patterns. If you don't do so, everything will continue to appear to you as random and meaningless. You will not understand the connectedness and you will dismiss everything as just a coincidences. Every time again.

I don't know how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you say things like the above, and then post things like "Last year we saw the exit of Michael Jackson ( exit of Sun King) and this year I expect San Adreas activity, but it might aswell find momentum next year or 2012 ( not later) , who knows"

 

[Paul]

by monitoring reality and anticipation on future developments.

You mean by waiting until after things have happened to decide if they are important and by posting such vague notions of the future that you can sometimes fit things to them.

What did happen around June 7?

The technical/science part is something for scientists

Then stop misusing scientific terms and pretending you have any idea about higher dimensions or the motion of astronomical objects.

 

[Paul]

I want to remind you that I don't do scientific research, but 'research' in a way that I listen to intuition and synchronicities first apply the elements of HDDesign and the correlations show up instantly.

Well they will, especially if you wait until after the event and use any of a large number of initially unspecified and readily mutable rules.

I have said it a dozen times here that this HDDesign 'research' isn't a normal scientific research

Then stop pretending it is when you talk about it.

HDDesign is unveiling the deepest underlying themes we have to deal with in the times we live in

HDD can't even decide who the magical Sun King is (or was, as he's always dying)

 

[Daylightstar]

It would disappear soon because if its not based on this hidden underlying Design it would become clear instantly that it is nonsense. No coincidences and meaningfull synchronicities and certainly no expectations for the future.

...

So, you think that your thread here still exists is because the moderators think it is not nonsense?

 

[Paul]

I have explained in this thread that you can 'place' such a HD Tetrahedron on any orbital position, but the HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel is 'hooked' on the system of dates we use. So 9/11 corresponds with September 11 etc.

First, I've just explained that what you show isn't, in any way, hyperdimensional.

Secondly, if such a thing existed, why would it be fixed about a constant point on the moving orbit of one planet in this dimension?

A HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel in Chine will show another 'orientation' so to speak as they use a different calendar

So the same HD tetrahedron, in the same position and orientation relative to the same planet, will have a completely different meaning simply because a different calendar is used? Doesn't that say all that needs to be said about the validity of such a system?

 

[Paul]

They only way to accept the validity of this concept is to come to this coclusion yourselves.

Nobody here has come to the same conclusion as you. Why does this lead to a belief that you are correct and we are just not trying?

Only by continued monitoring of how this material comes to light will eventually start you to understand that its not about coincidences.

Except for the coincidences you keep saying it is about:

You should follow the timelines, that's the only way for you to see these 'coincidences'.

You completely disregard numerous 'coincidences' that shouldn't be there if this material is completeluy based on randomness

all the synchronicities and coincidences that show up instantly in this material.

I experience all these synchronicities and coincidences while working on this stuff

the synchronicities and coincidences that show up continuesly

you are saying the same thing as years ago and ignoring the numerous 'coincidences' and sunchronicities in this material

While working with this HDdesign material, the 'coincidences' constantly show up, all the time

because of the 'coincidences' that show up all the time

Lucky coincidence? these kind of coincidences happen all the time in this HDDesign material

are you saying I just must dismiss these 'coincidences' when they continuously occur while working with this stuff?

In HDDesign these coincidences continue to show up, they happen all the time
​

Is that enough reminders?

 

[Dutch]

So it really doesn't matter what happens Dutch, you will simply find a way to make it fit "around" your “timeframe“.



As exemplified above “who will give 'expression' to this underlying theme” is, as always, simply you.

And when I post months in advance that I expect a 7+ eartquake for around May 27 and when that day comes Vanuatu is struck with a 7.5, its also me that makes it fit?

There are numerous examples of this in the material but you just refuse to monitor it. Its all there, its your decision, its your regret

 

[Dutch]

Any research that is not conducted with scientific rigour is flawed and eventually useless. Heck, a lot of scientific research turns out to be useless, too, but the reason we realize it's useless is because it was conducted in a scientific fashion.

Blue,
That's because you can only accept your rigid 3D perspective of reality. You simply close your eyes for all these 'coincidences' that show up instantly.

Wake up man, use your brain and truly think about it, monitor the timelines and notice the continued coincidences that are confirming the hidden underlying Design. You just focus in trying to resist what should be obvious for you by now.

 

[Dutch]

In a world where six billion human beings are interacting each and every day, even coincidences with a staggeringly small chance of happening will occur.

So why don't you help Mr Earl with a thread based on completely randomness, post your expectations on a timeline, compare it to the HDDesign material and find out yourselves.

 

[Dutch]

On other words, you need more time to amass yet more material and find even more "coincidences." That approach could fail you completely: you'll have so much material that whatever clarity you hoped to gain would be lost in the noise.

Not at all, it enables us to know when and why we have to deal with specific underlying themes in our reality. Pretty helpfull when it comes to de ultimate destiny of mankind

 

[Dutch]

Dutch, the big difference between your hobby (HDD) and mine (writing neat little computer programs) is I don't believe my hobby is going to reveal the deep secrets about our reality.

I agree

 

[Dutch]

No. I did not ask for an explanation.
I requested full documentation of a geometrical transformation/translation of a hyper dimensional platonic solid into geometrically determined orbital positions of an orbiting planet.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5988900&postcount=2855

You were being untruthful in saying it was in this thread. Your general referral to your own forum constitutes an admission of this.

If it is indeed in your own forum, please provide a link to a post or posts in your forum where you detail this documentation.

I am not going to go through your whole, extremely convoluted forum, to look for something for which you are unwilling to provide a direct link and which most likely isn't there, considering your lack of coöperativeness until now.

If it is there, please provide a link.

That IS the link, do you ever really read something? its in this thread aswell but I am not going to find it for you.

 

[Dutch]

I don't know how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you say things like the above, and then post things like "Last year we saw the exit of Michael Jackson ( exit of Sun King) and this year I expect San Adreas activity, but it might aswell find momentum next year or 2012 ( not later) , who knows"

I know that you don't know, so I will show you with the expectations on the timelines. wait and see

 

[Dutch]

So, you think that your thread here still exists is because the moderators think it is not nonsense?

no, do moderators delete everything THEY think is nonsense?

 

[Dutch]

First, I've just explained that what you show isn't, in any way, hyperdimensional.

Secondly, if such a thing existed, why would it be fixed about a constant point on the moving orbit of one planet in this dimension?

because movement in 3D is irrelavant to our perception of time. Its about the number of rotations on an orbit, regardles the actual position in 3D space

 

[Dutch]

So the same HD tetrahedron, in the same position and orientation relative to the same planet, will have a completely different meaning simply because a different calendar is used? Doesn't that say all that needs to be said about the validity of such a system?

because its applicable and valid for every single moment in our 3D reality yes. Everything that exists is based on this hidden underlying design.

You can create such a HD Tetrahedron or other platonic solid based figures on every single moment.

I thought to give you an example: today its June 17, 2010

creates a HD Tetrahedron with December 18, 2007

and guess what?

we were discussing here the very same thing!!!!!!!!!!

post number 552 on December 18, 2007:

Originally Posted by Mister Earl

Ok, then I will select a specific point to refute, we'll discuss that, then we'll go on to the next.

First point: Why does your HDD design consider the Earth's orbit as circular, and not elliptical as it is in nature? Considering the massive dependence your theory has on math, doesn't this skew your results?

Mister Earl, the answer on that question has been given in the 2 threads at BAUT forum. It has been explained that the 3D shape of the orbit is irrelevant as the geometrical interference points are determined by degrees corresponding with duration on the orbit, expressed in our system of dates. Read your own questions at baut again and make sure you read all my answers. With your first post here you are accusing me of not giving answers while it appears now that you have not read my answers at baut, or you are deliberately ignoring them for whatever reason.

 

[Dutch]

this is an perfect example of the power of HDDesign. I have never done such a think like in the above post. I had to think of it by intuition and the confirmation shows up instantly