Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

Nobody here has come to the same conclusion as you. Why does this lead to a belief that you are correct and we are just not trying?

because I am smart enough not to ignore the overwhelming confirmation by coincidences

 

[Dutch]

Is that enough reminders?

apparently not, how many coincidences do you need to open up your mind?

 

[Paul]

apparently not, how many coincidences do you need to open up your mind?

Make your mind up, you just said "its not about coincidences"
emphasis mine

 

[Paul]

I know that you don't know, so I will show you with the expectations on the timelines. wait and see

What you said was that someone who you now claim was the Sun King died last year and that sometime in the next 18 months you 'predict' activity somewhere along the 810 miles of a major fault. I'm sure glad you made that as accurate and helpful as you could.

 

[Paul]

because movement in 3D is irrelavant to our perception of time.

If something is moving in space, it is moving in time.

Its about the number of rotations on an orbit, regardles the actual position in 3D space

What is a rotation in this context? It seems to be something that occurs independently of the orbit.

If you want to claim that that a specific event on an orbiting body is caused by interaction with another entity in space, then the positions in space are important.

 

[Paul]

because its applicable and valid for every single moment in our 3D reality yes. Everything that exists is based on this hidden underlying design.

Yet you have no evidence for its existence. Remember, connecting events after the fact is not evidence of undetectable higher dimensional manipulators of the fabric of the universe.

You can create such a HD Tetrahedron or other platonic solid based figures on every single moment.

Thus rendering the whole concept completely useless.

I thought to give you an example: today its June 17, 2010

creates a HD Tetrahedron with December 18, 2007

How does it do that, and why is it a tetrahedron?

post number 552 on December 18, 2007:

Well pardon me for not going back two and a half years to find an example of you not answering the same question.

 

[Paul]

because I am smart enough not to ignore the overwhelming confirmation by coincidences

And apparently arrogant and closed-minded enough to believe that just because you imagine something it must be correct.

 

[Hans]

Paul

It is kinda fun watching old onnozel Dutch making stuff up however you do realize that the person you are talking to is completely insane in regards to the subject you are discussing?

 

[Dutch]

What you said was that someone who you now claim was the Sun King died last year and that sometime in the next 18 months you 'predict' activity somewhere along the 810 miles of a major fault. I'm sure glad you made that as accurate and helpful as you could.

again you fail to read a simple little text properly.

I was talking about an annually recurring orbital position around June 26, this year, next year or 2012 at the latest, with a big emphasize on this year

I case you still don't understand:

that means around June 26, 2010 or June 26, 2011 or June 26, 2012

 

[Dutch]

If something is moving in space, it is moving in time.

Yes , but do you understand that the actual 3D location is irrelevant?

in a sense that a shape of an orbit is not important, but the number of rotations on an orbit. That's why its irrelevant if an orbit becomes more eliptic or something like that. Shape is irrelevant

 

[Dutch]

What is a rotation in this context? It seems to be something that occurs independently of the orbit.

Good morning sir and good night sir, tomorrow an other rotation

If you want to claim that that a specific event on an orbiting body is caused by interaction with another entity in space, then the positions in space are important.

Well, you know I have never said 'caused' , but you don't know because again you show me that you don't actually read it or not properly.
I talk about 'reflection', like 'as above- so below'.

Indeed the ORBITAL positions in space are important, thats how for instance the Venus years in Earth days are determined: based on the number of rotation of Earth during a full orbit of Venus etc..

 

[Dutch]

Yet you have no evidence for its existence. Remember, connecting events after the fact is not evidence of undetectable higher dimensional manipulators of the fabric of the universe.

That's why I use the timelines for the expectations of future events

However, I disagree with you about the 'after the fact' issue.

When something happens 'out of the blue' and while dealing with it an intuitive thought pops up that when checked instantly unveils the hidden underlying correlations, not once or twice but all the time, than there's a strong indication of connectedness. Not that it proves so because you still have to notice it yourselves.

 

[Dutch]

Thus rendering the whole concept completely useless.

I think it should be obvious that NOTHING is based on this hidden underlying Design or EVERYTHING.

Do you think it can be known to understand ALL hidden 'geometrical' correlations for everything that happens in our reality at every single moment of our perception of time?

 

[Dutch]

How does it do that, and why is it a tetrahedron?

because its 911+eventsday apart, same thing like 9/11 and the Madrid bombings at macrolevel

like September 11, 2001 - March 11, 2004

dealing with the same underlying themes

at macrolevel with 9/11 and the madrid bombings and here at microlevel dealing with the same issues in the discussion

 

[Dutch]

Well pardon me for not going back two and a half years to find an example of you not answering the same question.

Sigh..... don't you understand that the emerging issue itself is selfexplanatory? Its exactly what HDDesign is about, dealing with specific underlying themes at specific moments in our perception of time

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3252647&postcount=550

 

[Dutch]

if you read on to post 558 you will notice the similarity with the current postings on the timeline Q2 2010 and a direct HD Tetrahedron link to the next important date on this timeline: Earth orbital position of the Grand Cross.

 

[Dutch]

And apparently arrogant and closed-minded enough to believe that just because you imagine something it must be correct.

you and me are talking about the same actual events in our reality

 

[Dutch]

I want to ask your special attention to the upcoming timeframe around June 26, 2010.
I have extracted the relevant information about the Grand Cross orbital position from the HDDesign material and I have reposted it in a seperate thread.
I recommend to read it first, you can find it here ( login with 'reader' password 'reader')
Grand Cross
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=413&mforum=hddesign
The underlying themes are already on the timeline but there's much more related info in this "Grand Cross" summary thread.
There's also relevant info posted on the timeline.
From the timeline Q2, 2010:

June 26, 2010 - 'on top' Grand Cross, read related posts on page 1 of the Q2 timeline
San Andreas fault
Exit of Sun King
probably getting momentum on June 23 already: Venus at same orbital position as during Robert Encke committed suicide
also: next hit on the last 911 Phi based timecoded spiral which end on the end of the Mayan Long Count December 21 or 23, 2012. read related thread here:
The last 911 based Phi spiral
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=119&mforum=hddesign
The Next Big One
The next Big One could strike Tokyo, Istanbul, Tehran, Mexico City, New Delhi, Kathmandu or the two metropolises near California's San Andreas Fault, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
also: the last Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron with the end of the Mayan Calendar, 911 days. Is monitored events timeframe with end of Mayan Long count as 911 endtriggerdate and the assassination of Benazir Bhutto on December 27, 2007 as 911 based starttrigger date/event.
Bhutto - end of Mayan Long count creates 1823 days 'control timeframe', with Grand Cross orbital position around June 26, 2010 as monitored events timeframe. Also based on the same underlying Design:
NASA astronomers refine the trajectory of new asteroid 2007 WD5, giving it a 1-in-25 (4%) chance of striking Mars on January 30, 2008. The object, estimated to be 50 meters wide, could impact Mars with the force of about three megatons of TNT. The potential strike area is close to the location of the Opportunity rover.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2007
already getting momentum early:
Magnitude 5.7 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
2010 June 15 04:26:58 UTC
and
Strong quakes rock eastern Indonesia
4 shakers hit the same region in an hour ( June 16)

I want to emphasize that these underlying themes are related the annually recurring orbital position of the 'Grand Cross'.
Last year we saw the exit of Michael Jackson ( exit of Sun King) and this year I expect San Adreas activity, but it might aswell find momentum next year or 2012 ( not later) , who knows. There's a strong 'orbital position echo' link though for this year, in relation to the December 26, 2004 Sumatra 9+ quake/tsunami.
You can find the timeline here ( login 'reader' password 'reader')
Q2 2010 april. may and June
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=401&mforum=hddesign

 

[Mister Earl]

Still more word salad, eh? Why expend precious calories by proving something, other than doing something as energy-saving as hand waving?

HDD is bunk, and your own personal unwillingness to provide evidence is enough.

 

[Blue Mountain]

That's because you can only accept your rigid 3D perspective of reality. You simply close your eyes for all these 'coincidences' that show up instantly.

My "rigid 3D perspective of reality" is underpinned by science. You know, that funky human endeavour that gave you the computer that you are working on and the internet that we're communicating over.

Wake up man, use your brain and truly think about it, monitor the timelines and notice the continued coincidences that are confirming the hidden underlying Design. You just focus in trying to resist what should be obvious for you by now.

What I see is a whole pile of data mining and retrofitting, as well as counting the hits and forgetting the misses.