Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, Dutch, where's the full documentation of an example of said transformation/translation?

Or ... where you uuhm ... let's say ... less than truthful when you said it was in this thread and that you knew how to do such a thing? I guess you were.

How does it feel Dutch, when you have to be dishonest and cowardly about your claims?
Do you have a lovely psychological mechanism for not feeling anything about it at all?

you dare
 
Yep.

Even on a woo forum, where woos post their "synchronicities etc", Dutch rarely acknowledges them, and merely continues his spamming.

See here: http://www.freedomcrowsnest.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10814

That topic's been going for 5 years now. Let Dutch use some other server's space for his drivel.

So why don't you debunk it once and for all Orphia?

I have yet to see your first clever comment on this material.

You completely disregard numerous 'coincidences' that shouldn't be there if this material is completeluy based on randomness. A serious research of the material would unveil this
 
Mods have a tendency not to close a thread unless it goes severely off the rails or the poster is banned. Aside from from being tiresome and predictable, the worst Dutch has done is possibly breaching Rule 4 ("Do not post large amounts of material available from other sites"—in this case, his own).

He doesn't even breach Rule 6 ("No spamming or flooding") due to the phrase in that rule that says "in a manner that disrupts the functioning of the Forum". His posts are tedious, repetitive, and long-winded, but they aren't disruptive so I don't see them as being actionable.

The JREF doesn't have a "put up or shut up" rule like BAUT has, so we can't sanction him that way either. So unless Dutch has a major meltdown and starts sending threatening PMs to the moderators, I think we're stuck with his drivel for as long as he's interested in it.

you can let it rest if you can't deal with it with proper arguments
 
you can let it rest if you can't deal with it with proper arguments

With respect, Dutch, what you give us are not proper arguments. Your wall-of-text posts are difficult to plough through, and you are so disorganized that not even you can adequately keep track of everything you're trying to follow.

Your system is a mish-mash of astrology and numerology, your methods are arbitrary, and your conclusions are all post hoc. HDD makes no predictions, relying instead on your—and only your—intuition to work. It's not replicable and it's not falsifiable. It's not science and it's not useful.

It does make for an interesting hobby, perhaps. But it's nowhere near as groundbreaking as you think it is.
 
So Dutch, what happened "around June 7"?

You know the underlying theme already and for what has happened you have to read the timeline.

Do you think they would tell us if they've decided to go for it?
 
With respect, Dutch, what you give us are not proper arguments. Your wall-of-text posts are difficult to plough through, and you are so disorganized that not even you can adequately keep track of everything you're trying to follow.

Your system is a mish-mash of astrology and numerology, your methods are arbitrary, and your conclusions are all post hoc. HDD makes no predictions, relying instead on your—and only your—intuition to work. It's not replicable and it's not falsifiable. It's not science and it's not useful.

It does make for an interesting hobby, perhaps. But it's nowhere near as groundbreaking as you think it is.

Oh yes it is. You should follow the timelines, that's the only way for you to see these 'coincidences'.
 
You know the underlying theme already and for what has happened you have to read the timeline.
OK, so nothing has happened. What does that tell you about HDD?

Do you think they would tell us if they've decided to go for it?
To repeat the question, they? it?
 
Oh yes it is. You should follow the timelines, that's the only way for you to see these 'coincidences'.
Except that we don't see any coincidence; we see separate things happening at separate times in separate places and we don't use mythology, pseudoscience and misapplication of mathematics to force them into a tenuous conflation.
 
'Interesting', I see some statements there that invite further questions:

The Hyper Dimensional dates based on Platonic Solid Geometry originate from other dimensional realms and therefor it's only by Geometry that their existence could be unveiled, as they are invisible in our 3 dimensional reality.
And what makes you think that is in any way true and demonstrable?

our solar system with all it's rotating elements, could be considered the 3 dimensional counterpart of a Hyper Dimensional system, at least that's what my research is trying to get confirmed.
Really, you've been doing research? Every time we try to get any information out of you we are told you are too busy looking for coincidences that have already happened.

In case you've forgotten, by your own dates you've been conducting this research for over 4 years now. How are the interim results?


These Hyperdimensional Tetrahedron based interference points...
The tetrahedron is simply 2 pyramids that you have arbitrarily arranged on a north/south axis (you don't say which north/south) and, again arbitrarily, scaled to give the supposedly important latitudes.

Not only is it most definitely not hyper dimensional, there is no given reason for the scale or orientation of the component elements.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom