Hyper Dimensional Design

[The Man]

And when I post months in advance that I expect a 7+ eartquake for around May 27 and when that day comes Vanuatu is struck with a 7.5, its also me that makes it fit?

The 27th of May had come and gone in Vanuatu, it was 4:14 am local time on the 28th.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Vanuatu_earthquake


Wow a prediction of a “7+” earthquake when we average about 12 a year and have already had 10 this year (at least magnitude 7), 2 in May and one June 12th.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_earthquakes

One last year on May 28th

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_earthquakes

One in May of 2008 (12th)

Two in May of 2006 (3rd and 16th)

Two May 26 2003

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_21st_century_earthquakes

Did you predict a 7.2 eartquake on exactly May 28th at some particular time in Vanuatu? If not, then it is still you “that makes it fit”.


Wow an earthquake in a seismically active region.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Vanuatu_earthquakes


7.1 Jan 9th 2001

7.2 Jan 2nd 2002

7.1 March 25th 2007

7.2 August 1st 2007

7.8 October 7th 2009

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_21st_century_earthquakes

There are numerous examples of this in the material but you just refuse to monitor it. Its all there, its your decision, its your regret

Examples of what, you making a vague prediction of a “7+ eartquake for around May 27” when there is high probability of at least a 7 magnitude earthquake in just about any month?

Dutch my only regret is that “you just refuse to monitor” your own hand in your purported “synchronicities”.

 

[dafydd]

you and me are talking about the same actual events in our reality

Your reality,please do not include us in your fantasy world.

 

[Daylightstar]

That IS the link, do you ever really read something? its in this thread aswell but I am not going to find it for you.

What I requested is not behind that link. It's sad that you have to be so dishonest.

 

[Paul]

Paul

It is kinda fun watching old onnozel Dutch making stuff up however you do realize that the person you are talking to is completely insane in regards to the subject you are discussing?

since about page 2

 

[Paul]

I was talking about an annually recurring orbital position around June 26, this year, next year or 2012 at the latest, with a big emphasize on this year

In that case you should have said so.

that means around June 26, 2010 or June 26, 2011 or June 26, 2012

Considering that, according to the USGS, "Literally thousands of small earthquakes occur in California each year" that's not much of a prediction.

 

[Paul]

Yes , but do you understand that the actual 3D location is irrelevant?

I understand that you keep saying so, although I have no idea why because you never explain.

in a sense that a shape of an orbit is not important

Something else you keep insisting on with no sound reasoning.

but the number of rotations on an orbit

Again, rotations on an orbit implies that they are not the same thing. However you also compare rotations of earth to the orbital period of Venus

That's why its irrelevant if an orbit becomes more eliptic or something like that. Shape is irrelevant

Look, if you want to insist interacting, or reflection, then the interacting items must be in very close proximity in space.

Because all the bodies in question are in constant movement relative to each other, to the sun, the galaxy and the universe in general, it is very important to know exactly where they are if you want to pretend your ideas have any merit.

Your tactic of using the calendar as if it has any significance beyond human organisational convenience merely betrays a lack of understanding and total incomprehension of the vast distances being travelled every minute, let alone the extra days you add in with no valid justification.

In fact, according to data supplied by NASA, I calculate that one of your hyperdimensional solids and earth would interact for a little less than 15 minutes.

 

[Paul]

Good morning sir and good night sir, tomorrow an other rotation

OK, let's assume that you mean solar days.

Well, you know I have never said 'caused'

Funny how you like to play semantic games but do not have the ability to give simple concise answers to any questions.

but you don't know because again you show me that you don't actually read it or not properly.
I talk about 'reflection', like 'as above- so below'.

You talk about those things, but they mean nothing. They're just words with no firm definition and no relationship to actual events.

Indeed the ORBITAL positions in space are important, thats how for instance the Venus years in Earth days are determined: based on the number of rotation of Earth during a full orbit of Venus etc..

Yet you fail to see how this raises the question of the actuall positions of any bodies involved.

 

[Paul]

That's why I use the timelines for the expectations of future events

Expectations vague enough, with margins large enough to allow retrofitting of events with enormously tangential connections.

However, I disagree with you about the 'after the fact' issue.

What did happen "around June 7"?

When something happens 'out of the blue'

After it has already happened

and while dealing with it an intuitive thought pops up that when checked instantly unveils the hidden underlying correlations

Using no fixed method.

Not that it proves so because you still have to notice it yourselves.

Have you never though that we don't notice it because theres nothing to notice?

 

[Paul]

I think it should be obvious that NOTHING is based on this hidden underlying Design or EVERYTHING.

I don't know why you would believe such a thing, but absent any evidence, I am definitely going for nothing.

Do you think it can be known to understand ALL hidden 'geometrical' correlations for everything that happens in our reality at every single moment of our perception of time?

Given that at the very least you make a number of baseless assumptions in your work I don't see any reason to even consider the possibility of perhaps investigating the feasibility of contemplating the theoretical likelihood of there being any basis to whatever it was you tried to say in that sentence.

 

[Sideroxylon]

Funny how you like to play semantic games but do not have the ability to give simple concise answers to any questions.

Someone avoiding saying anything of substance might get three years and 75 pages out of a thread like this.

... the god-awful tedium of it all.

 

[Paul]

because its 911+eventsday apart, same thing like 9/11 and the Madrid bombings at macrolevel...

How does that create a higher dimensional shape, and why is it a tetrahedron?

 

[Paul]

... the god-awful tedium of it all.

Nobody said you have to play.

 

[Chris L]

Nobody said you have to play.

True, but as long as we are here, the least Dutch could do is actually make it interesting. This "science that isn't a science, just my intuition" stuff isn't much to play with. If he'd be a bit more imaginative, maybe the rest of us could play too.

 

[Daylightstar]

I wonder if Dutch's HDD writings (stringing pretty and sciency sounding terms into sentences) are simply his obsessive-compulsive trait.

 

[Orphia Nay]

What use is HDD? Dutch, what are all your calculations for?

 

[Hans]

Orphia Nay

For stoking his ego. Dutch believes he has found a way to predict the future and understand the present. He is deluded and fatally obssessed with his own self determined brilliance.

 

[dafydd]

Orphia Nay

For stoking his ego. Dutch believes he has found a way to predict the future and understand the present. He is deluded and fatally obssessed with his own self determined brilliance.

He has never predicted the future though,we just get old news from him.

 

[Dutch]

On October 12, 2009 the American writer Edgar Allan Poe received a second funeral in Baltimore, USA, 160 years after his death and 200 years after his birth.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8301128.stm

Poe and his works influenced literature in the United States and around the world, as well as in specialized fields, such as cosmology and cryptography.

Poe also reinvented science fiction, responding in his writing to emerging technologies such as hot air balloons in "The Balloon-Hoax".

http://www.synchromysticismforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&p=21644

Snipped for compliance with Rule 4. Do not post long tracts of text available elsewhere. Instead, post a short quote and a link to the other source.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL

 

[Daylightstar]

Hmm I see Dutch has been hobbying again.

Does your family know your have this hobby, Dutch?

 

[Daylightstar]

Dutch, before you do your analysis, consider that the beginning of the Mayan calender does not correlate with the current timeframe across the timecoded golden mean spiral.
This causes a shift of the trigger patterns and the hyper dimensional cube timeframe will collapse at macrolevel.
Your assessment of the orbital position of the grand cross is thus incorrect.

This creates a conflict with the hidden underlying multidimensional design.
You need to recalculate the HD cube dates.

Were you aware of this issue?