OK, let's cut to the chase.
Read WHICH 31+14 pages??? Of what?
However we remain open to new evidence, GOOD evidence. How about you?
No, the skeptics are asking you, the homeopaths, to show that homeopathy DOES work. We are simply making the observation that science and logic do not seem to support your position, but if you can prove us wrong then great!Dr. MAS said:Dear Ashles,
Your (here your means all skeptics) point was homeopathy does not work.
Read 31+14 pages.
Read WHICH 31+14 pages??? Of what?
Actually we have. Many times. And you were shown the studies. And they were all NEGATIVE for homeopathy working. Selective memory all of a sudden?Dr. MAS said:You had only one point, according to avogadro's number potencies does not contain any starting material hense it does not work. Actually you did not perform experiment to proove this opinion.
Shouting? The only people shouting are you and your tiny band of colleagues.Dr. MAS said:I rejected this theory and you are now convinced that avogadro number theory is hypothetical base. Read few posts at www.nchpakistan.com forum. Then you (and other few members) starting shouting, we have no problem with avogadro's number. The problem is homeopathic medicines do not work.
You. You have provided no explanation of how homeopathy works or even a convincing demonstration that is DOES work, so the problem lies with you. We know how things DO work, and anyone from a child up can demostrate it successfully time and again. We have provided clear evidence that shows homeopathy does NOT work, with an explanation as to why. So, again, the problem with homeopathy is with you.Dr. MAS said:Again a drama was staged by my colleagues and now you are again convinced that you have no problem with below 18x but you have some doubt over above 18x potency?
Kindly tell me who is wasting time? me or you? Who has problem in understanding homeopathic medicines? Me or you?
However we remain open to new evidence, GOOD evidence. How about you?