gumboot
lorcutus.tolere
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,327
why did Israel use intelligence from 2007..to destroy a UN school in 2009???

why did Israel use intelligence from 2007..to destroy a UN school in 2009???

How many years of these attacks has Israel had, to perfect a system whereby the second a rocket is launched, instant retribution would be delivered?
The Tit for Tat strategy can only work for so long, Israel has been willing to play along but Hamas is really not playing with the same thing in mind, which ideally is coexistence, but rather the end of the other.
But Hamas doesn't really have the means to achieve what it wants, so maybe Tit for Tat can still work?
See the pics I posted above, in Gaza watching militants fight is a spectator sport.
Argue with this guy:Most of them look like they were taken on the hamas equiv of open days. Standard PR. you can find a fair number of pics from northern ireland of soldiers posing with kids.
I expect you won't, and you will then hand-wave it away.I'm gonna have my arabic speaking friend translate that. I expect some errors.
Argue with this guy:
puppycow said:Hamas Wants Civilian Casualties
From the OP:
Of course they do and the more children the better
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J08GqXMr3YE
It's ambiguous. As someone said, is he pulling that child out of the way of fire?
I expect you won't, and you will then hand-wave it away.
Riiiiight...
[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~dylanaverysucksballs/shields/Hamas-Human-Shields.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~dylanaverysucksballs/shields/HumanShields.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~dylanaverysucksballs/shields/Pals-HumanShields3.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~dylanaverysucksballs/shields/terrorcivilians6.jpg[/qimg]
No chance at all of anyone else getting shot!
TFT, you don't seem to have the slightest clue as to how Hamas fights.
Why doesn't he make sure both are moving out of the line of fire?
We don't know, it's a 15 second video that explains nothing.
Mm-hmm. Israel's actions are all instantly identifiable and understandable to be ethnic cleansing and the like, while Hamas actions are inscrutable without any context.
If getting that one kid out of harm's way was the fighter's objective, then it is reprehensible that he left the other kid in harm's way. If the kid is being picked up to be used as a human shield, then the abandoning of the other kid is understandable. He's running past an area where he could be fired upon, and he only needs the one kid to get through there.
And the admission of Hamas to using human shields again and again is undeniable.