Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

Simples, I can look at the facts and make my own mind up. :D

But you've admitted that your knowledge is insufficient for you to do that. Did you look up newtonian physics or relativity in order to use a GPS ? Or do you assume that the people who made the damn thing know better than you how physics work ?

Do you think taxpayers only have to pay for publicly funded science and not have an opinion ?

Non sequitur.
 
But you've admitted that your knowledge is insufficient for you to do that. Did you look up newtonian physics or relativity in order to use a GPS ? Or do you assume that the people who made the damn thing know better than you how physics work ?


Nope that's not what I said :D

Look again HERE


Here's more facts about the Sun - Earth connection ;)

Space Weather, Storm Alerts | S0 News May 27, 2015
 
Nope that's not what I said

Yeah, it kinda was. You admitted that you're not a scientist, and your posting record indicates that you know next to nothing about science. You have demonstrated a complete inability to grasp basic scientific theories and principles, which leads me to conclude that you are incapable of not only discerning what constitutes evidence for what, but also to interpret said evidence in order to reach a reasoned conclusion. You don't even display a rudimentary, grade-school familiarity with science.

Therefore, your claim to follow the evidence where it leads is dubious, at best.
 
Yeah, it kinda was. You admitted that you're not a scientist, and your posting record indicates that you know next to nothing about science. You have demonstrated a complete inability to grasp basic scientific theories and principles, which leads me to conclude that you are incapable of not only discerning what constitutes evidence for what, but also to interpret said evidence in order to reach a reasoned conclusion. You don't even display a rudimentary, grade-school familiarity with science.

Therefore, your claim to follow the evidence where it leads is dubious, at best.


So you say :dl:
 
So you say:
No, Haig, so you say.
You stated that you follow the empirical evidence and then show that to be a lie by
* repeatedly citing the delusions in a crank YouTube video channel by Ben Davidson.
* repeatedly ignoring the empirical evidence :jaw-dropp!
21st May 2015 Haig: A lie about "The science is there if you follow the scientific method / empirical science" (you are not following the empirical evidence just blindly believing in the delusions of cranks).
4 May 2015 Haig: The scientific evidence is that there is no connection between solar activity and earthquakes.
 
So you say

No, so YOU say. That's the point. YOU have made it clear that you don't know science from a wart on a donkey's ass, which makes it obvious that you cannot interpret the data properly. It's especially silly that you think you can interpret it better than trained and experienced scientists.
 
No, so YOU say. That's the point. YOU have made it clear that you don't know science from a wart on a donkey's ass, which makes it obvious that you cannot interpret the data properly. It's especially silly that you think you can interpret it better than trained and experienced scientists.


No Belz, what I have made clear (obviously NOT to you ;-) ) is that even a numpty can point to the facts :D


Here are some more data / facts on the Sun - Earth connection ...

Mid-Range Tropics Warning, Space Weather | S0 News May 28, 2015
 
No Belz, what I have made clear (obviously NOT to you ;-) ) is that even a numpty can point to the facts :D


Here are some more data / facts on the Sun - Earth connection ...

Mid-Range Tropics Warning, Space Weather | S0 News May 28, 2015

Except that there's absolutely no data there relating to your alleged Earth-Sun connection. It's just a guy rambling about sunspots for a while and then giving a weather report. None of the links in the video description are in any way data supporting the hypothesis, either, even when they aren't just links to the same "Suspicious0bserver" site that's peddling this nonsense in the first place.
 
No Belz, what I have made clear (obviously NOT to you ;-) ) is that even a numpty can point to the facts :D

Only if he can spot the facts. You demonstrably cannot.

But even if you could, saying "hey, it's cold today" means nothing if you cannot intepret that fact correctly. You demonstrably cannot.
 
Last edited:
I see yesterdays planetary alignment was spectacularly... urmmmm... non-eventful!
 
Another sunspot ramble, another weather report, another complete lack of any indication of connection between the two.

You might as well argue that the Great Red Spot on Jupiter is responsible.


Well you've got that backwards :eek:

Our variable star enters a Grand Solar Minimum and Jupiter changes along with the rest of the solar system.

Energy from Space


Jupiter's New Red Spot


Big Mystery: Jupiter Loses a Stripe


Now Broadcasting From Radio Jupiter


Super Storm on Saturn


Modern Marsquakes


Glaciers, Old Masters, and Galileo: The Puzzle of the Chilly 17th Century
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom