Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes
- Thread starter aleCcowaN
- Start date
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
Well that's the game, no? Churn out unrelated links and claim whatever?
You're not paying attention if you think they are NOT related
Our World is Changing: Looking Beyond 'the 2012'
You're not paying attention if you think they are NOT related
Our World is Changing: Looking Beyond 'the 2012'
This explanation should also help ...
"On 29 May 2015, Bob Weber, N Mich USA Subscriber wrote:
Gerry, yes. Low solar flux is affecting the planet already. The places where it is warm or hot now are areas in the NH where there is large amounts of atmospheric water vapor. Even a weak sun nearing our summer solstice feels warm and will feel even warmer with a lot of water vapor in the air, as it has in the US southern states, INDIA, and anywhere else near the tropics. I've monitored water vapor images every day for well over a year, and regularly see ocean evaporation changes in response to solar activity changes. The extreme weather in the US lately was caused by that El Nino moisture clashing with very southward cold waves from the north. W/o that El Nino now, I think it'd be cooler everywhere except the tropics. My research includes the quantifiable solar-ENSO relationship; for instance, without recent upticks in solar flux that only lasted 10-14 days at a time, this El Nino would've fizzled out sooner. Two weeks of F10.7cm flux under 120 =>> ocean evaporation drops off!"
Trakar
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 12,637
Your missing the point
No you are (properly abbreviated as the contraction "you're") missing the point. Anecdote and wander-blabber "reckoning" being bandied as reasoning, absent a connecting mechanism and verification data connecting the mechanism to the result, is not Support, much less confirmation of what you assert as fact.
Trakar
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 12,637
Game or not, it certainly fits the M.O. some seem to substitute for the well-considered, reasoned and logically supported discussion of issues of science.
Well actually I have suggested a connecting mechanism.
Evidence for solar wind modulation of lightning
So solar wind controlling the lightning and hence storms here on Earth actually is relevant to this hypothesis of the OP ... of solar events triggering earthquakes, volcanoes, major storms where lightning is associated with ALL of them !
Do you dispute the paper that says the solar wind modulates the lightning here on Earth ?
Last edited:
Trakar
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 12,637
This is not explaining a mechanism that leads to lightning causing earthquakes, volcanoes, etc.,.
lightning may be generated by effects associated with earthquakes and volcanoes, but you have not presented evidence supporting or even indicating the possibility that lightning causes earthquakes or volcanoes by some unknown mechanism that you can't describe.
Again, correlation (with) is not causation (of).
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/pr...ssion-correlation/v/correlation-and-causality
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation
http://www.skepticblog.org/2014/01/22/autism-and-vaccines-correlation-is-not-causation/
tusenfem
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 3,306
It's easy to miss the point if there is no point
Do you understand the difference between cause and effect? I can rub a baloon on my jumper and give it a charge that would stick it to a wall. Putting the baloon against a wall won't give it such a charge.
tusenfem
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 3,306
And the sun was spotless!!
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
I'm pretty sure you didn't watch the yooboob crapfest you linked. Would you like to know what facts it cited?
Here you go...
That's it. That was the only fact contained in that 5 min 60 yoocrock video.
Try again from Haig, are you actually trying to convince people?
If so it would be better to present your arguments in writing, possibly with diagrams. I doubt that people will bother with a video unless there is some explanation as to its contents and why that is the appropriate format.
If so it would be better to present your arguments in writing, possibly with diagrams. I doubt that people will bother with a video unless there is some explanation as to its contents and why that is the appropriate format.
It may have escaped your attention but this thread wasn't started by me, so NO I'm NOT trying to convince people per se.
I'm just putting the facts and data on here to show the amazing Sun - Earth connection that may trigger earthquakes, volcanoes, major storms etc.
Isn't that what aleCcowaN in the OP wanted me to do ?
Others are free to make their own minds up but the evidence is growing. But we already know that the solar wind modulates lightning here on Earth and hence storms and nobody has refuted that and that mechanism is a clue to the answer.
That's your choice. However, they say a picture is worth a thousand words so what's a video worth ?
This guy (imo) is a excellent communicator regardless of whether you agree or disagree with him. So what would you gain by my attempt to "articulate" it ? Nothing is the answer.
Large Japan Quake, Space Weather | S0 News May 31, 2015
"I'm just putting the facts and data on here to show the amazing Sun - Earth connection that may trigger earthquakes, volcanoes, major storms etc."It may have escaped your attention but this thread wasn't started by me, so NO I'm NOT trying to convince people per se.
I'm just putting the facts and data on here to show the amazing Sun - Earth connection that may trigger earthquakes, volcanoes, major storms etc.
Isn't that what aleCcowaN in the OP wanted me to do ?
Others are free to make their own minds up but the evidence is growing. But we already know that the solar wind modulates lightning here on Earth and hence storms and nobody has refuted that and that mechanism is a clue to the answer.
If that is, indeed, what you think you're doing, then I must say that you are doing a terrible job!
Instead, what you seem to be doing is link-spamming, and your sources do not present "facts and data" either; instead there's a great amount of opinion, wooly verbiage, wild speculation, etc. So, instead of behaving like a spam troll, why don't you collect the actual "facts and data" that seem so impressive to you, and post them? Perhaps in a bullet list, as your hero David Talbott did, together with links to *reliable* sources?