Gravy Cleanses Silverstein Quote

Ah, yes, but remember CT logic (TM), man! To wit:
Huntsman said:
You really are that ignorant. Is English a second language?

"I went to work, then I went out to get a pizza."
Click to expand...

...and the pizza exploded into fine powder!
"I washed the dog, then I watched TV and drank a beer."
Click to expand...
...and my dog had a concrete core!
"I went to the store, then I painted the house."
Click to expand...
...so the explosion behind my house was Photoshopped in!
 
First, the key word was "pull".
Next, the key word was "it".
Now, the key word is "then".

I'm half-expecting someone to focus next on the word "the" in this lunatic attempt to squeeze a confession out of this sentence.
 
btw, anyone, what was the question that Silverstein was responding to? Serious.
 
chipmunk stew said:
I'm half-expecting someone to focus next on the word "the" in this lunatic attempt to squeeze a confession out of this sentence.
Click to expand...

and then we watched the building collapse." –Larry Silverstein
Click to expand...

Well, come on! "the" building? "THE" is THE definite article! How could they know which build would collapse, HUH? It should have been 'A' building collapsed!!! Without perfect foreknowledge of the entire timeline of 9/11, thier's know way the ccould have "knownd" THE BUILDING was going to coollllpases?!!!?




So how's that?
 
Bell said:
btw, anyone, what was the question that Silverstein was responding to? Serious.
Click to expand...

"So when, during the few hours you had available, did you decide to rig the building for controlled demolition and make it look like an accident, contracting out a demo firm, involving hundreds of rescue workers and civllians, news agencies, and others, covering everything up?"

:D
 
Horatius said:
Well, come on! "the" building? "THE" is THE definite article! How could they know which build would collapse, HUH? It should have been 'A' building collapsed!!! Without perfect foreknowledge of the entire timeline of 9/11, thier's know way the ccould have "knownd" THE BUILDING was going to coollllpases?!!!?




So how's that?
Click to expand...
Damn... You're right. I've played right into their hands. Lisa, please cleanse all posts referring to the topic of "the".
 
Jeez guys... :rolleyes: lol, I guess ;)

But serious. That could put the whole quote in context.
 
10,000' view. The thread title and OP highlight the illogical thinking of the CT mindset. Intent is applied without substantiating evidence. No action can be viewed as accidental, unintentional, or a faux pas.

Follow this with the difference in response. When the error was brought to Gravy's attention the document was immediately corrected and redisseminated with indications as to what the error was, and that it is corrected in the new version of the document. Compare this with CT documents, Hoffman for example, the errors in particle size, and makeup, have been pointed out; yet the document still contains the errors and revisions of the document are not replaced on sites mirroring the information.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
10,000' view. The thread title and OP highlight the illogical thinking of the CT mindset. Intent is applied without substantiating evidence. No action can be viewed as accidental, unintentional, or a faux pas.

Follow this with the difference in response. When the error was brought to Gravy's attention the document was immediately corrected and redisseminated with indications as to what the error was, and that it is corrected in the new version of the document. Compare this with CT documents, Hoffman for example, the errors in particle size, and makeup, have been pointed out; yet the document still contains the errors and revisions of the document are not replaced on sites mirroring the information.
Click to expand...

I never got a response from Truthy, so now I declare Arky my new e-dad.


mind if i call you arky, new e-dad?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Last i checked, I had completely demolished CS naked assertions with evidence, reasoning, and calculations.
Click to expand...

Evidence, reasoning, and calculations -- you've shown no indication that you even know what any of those words mean.

Demolished CS, in what parallel universe? The land of Oz? Then again, you'd fit right in with Dorothy and the Scarecrow, wouldn't you? You could be the Cowardly Liar.
 
Somebody asked what question Silverstein was responding to. All we have is that short snippet of answer from the PBS documentary. Is there any way we can get a longer section of tape released? It would be interesting to see if a few more seconds of context were enough to close this question once and for all.
 
boloboffin said:
Somebody asked what question Silverstein was responding to. All we have is that short snippet of answer from the PBS documentary. Is there any way we can get a longer section of tape released? It would be interesting to see if a few more seconds of context were enough to close this question once and for all.
Click to expand...

I asked. I did because I never saw the documentary, and was indeed curious to find context. What if, for example, the interviewer asked something like "How did you and the FDNY came to the decision to let WTC7 burn and collapse by itself?"

Or something...
 
Bell said:
I asked. I did because I never saw the documentary, and was indeed curious to find context. What if, for example, the interviewer asked something like "How did you and the FDNY came to the decision to let WTC7 burn and collapse by itself?"

Or something...
Click to expand...

Yes, the documentary only has that short clip. I went to the Great Projects website and emailed one of their producers about getting more context. Hey, it never hurts to ask, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom