No, the WTC towers didn't crumble into fine dust. They exploded into fine dust, along with shredded steel. If you wish to dispute this, in spite of the overwhelming evidence, please, present some evidence. Where is the concrete? I'm waiting.
(bolding mine)
And that is one of your many problems, TS. You're
waiting. Why? What kind of education has led you to believe the way to prove your claims is to wait for...what? Divine intervention? You're going to have a very long wait.
Sorry, but that's not how it's done, and did you ever come to the wrong place – a forum for critical thinkers – to play that game! Your claims: your burden of proof. You don't like the NIST report? Prove it wrong. You can't do that with beliefs, my friend. You'll need evidence. The only thing you've presented so far is some thoroughly laughable and totally debunked physics from dental engineer Judy Wood, who believes the towers should have fallen like trees.
Is that it, then? Is that all you've got?
If not, then why don't you stop stalling, as we've been asking you to do since your first posts, and start providing your evidence? Your bluff has been called EVERY TIME YOU POST. Yet you are unable to show that your statements are anything more than 100% unadulterated horsecrap.
You can start right now. Everyone's watching. No excuses. Ready?
1) What explosive is capable of producing the effects you claim for the towers: complete "powderization" of the contents, "shredding" of the steel, and a "pyroclastic flow" that expands to three times the volume of the towers.
Answer the question. Right now. Or withdraw the claim.
2) Why did the "pyroclastic flow" not poison and/or burn to death everyone it came in contact with, including the survivors in the towers?
3) Define "powderized" or "turned to dust." What was the average size of the debris of the contents of the towers, and who made the measurements that your claim is based on? Show your sources.
4) If all the concrete was "powderized" by explosives, how were about 1,600 victim identifications able to be made? How were people able to survive in the towers?
5) Define "shredded steel." How large was the average piece of steel in the piles, and who made the measurements that your claim is based on? Show your sources.
6) From what height would the upper section of one of the towers have to be dropped in order to initiate a gravity-driven collapse? Show your math.
7) In the scenario in #6, what would happen to the floor concrete? Be specific.
8) Was building 7 destroyed in the same way as the towers? If not, how was it destroyed?
9) What are the chunks of gray material in the photos below?
No more whining. No more "waiting." Provide evidence for your claims. Begin. We're all watching.
