According to my local paper, the sect is claiming that some of the girls identified as underage are actually adults. Don't know if it's true, but if so that may account for some of the discrepancy.
Apparently these girls have been told to lie like crazy and not tell anything firm, not who their parents are, what their last name is, how many wives their father has, how many children ect.... They also know that their family and husband will get in big trouble if they are underage and have had children. So they lie.
Now several (many?) of the girls have admitted that they are underage probably because if they are older they will be taken from their children. All women over 18 are forced to leave back to the compound or a state shelter. Several lawyers have come forward and admitted that their client is underage.
So this is a double edge sword. Are they actually underage or are they overage but pretending to be underage so they can stay with their children?
Well if they are 18-20 and are saying they are underage so they can stay with their children, they probably were underage when they were "married" so they would be wonderful to turn states evidence. They need these people to come forward and testify.
DNA will tell parentage. How will they prove age? Are dental records that accurate to tell a 16 year old from a 18 year old? They have taken all official records and photos that might show a relationship and dates, what a mess trying to sort this all out. With patience this will be straighted out, there will not be a quick fix.
I wonder if the reason why there are less boys is because Jeffs hand-picked the people at this compound, and he pre-selected less boys to live there. Maybe some of the missing boys are at other compounds?
Thanks for the article Lisa. I have heard about these boys for years, glad to hear that 4 are suing Jeffs, wonder what has become of this lawsuit now that they have Jeffs in custody?
Susan