February Stundie nominations

This is from an ATS thread on a pole shift predicted for March 11:

canadabcpg said:
if a mass extinction event were to happen do you really think the public would be notified?

I doubt it

there would be so much panic and chaos and people wouldn't go to work which would cause even more chaos around the money markets

Bit hard to go to work when you're dead. But I've always suspected that stock brokers were zombies.
 
Well, they never told us about the extinction of the Dinosaurs, They used some story about a flood to cover it up.
 
When I was in the US Army, one of my Officers made a comment after 'Empire" that Darth Vader sure had a strict Zero Defects system.....

I've worked for people like that. It really just kills innovation. If I was Darth Vader I'd encourage a freedom to fail policy that got my spaceship commanders really thinking out of the box. We'd all have a symbolic ego deposit box by the door to the conference room and go in free to accept responsibility and analyze how we could have done things better. Then I'd totally choke the bastard.
 
Box Boy Gage gets at least two good ones in his anti-CIT post:

I was also surprised to learn that 12 of the witnesses that CIT interviewed (including six witnesses to whom CIT refers to as north path witnesses) were in a position to see the Pentagon and all 12 stated that they saw the plane hit the Pentagon.


Gee, he was "surprised to learn" what we've been pointing out for literally years now.


Because of these concerns I provided new statements in December 2009 and January 2010 pointing out that my previous statement of support should not be interpreted as an endorsement of their conclusion that the airplane flew over the Pentagon. Despite these statements, CIT has continued to publish my original statement and characterize it as an endorsement of their flyover conclusion. I am hereby now on the record clearly as NOT supporting the CIT investigation at all. In addition, I insist that CIT delete my name from its web site in any and every context in which it might give the impression of support or endorsement of their efforts from me.


..and then he berates CIT for doing exactly what he does with his A&E "petition" list.



http://911blogger.com/news/2011-02-08/richard-gage-completely-withdraws-support-cit
 
A subtle one here from Anders Lindman:

I didn't find any official statement about the type of jet engine found. Isn't that important to know? In order to match the engine to determine from which plane it came from and if it was an engine on the left or on the right side of the plane?

Apparently, right engines are a different type from left engines.

Dave
 
A subtle one here from Anders Lindman:

[snip]

Apparently, right engines are a different type from left engines.

Dave


I've seen truthers complain about debunkers needing the government to spoon-fed them information, but... wow...
 
.
We had thought here at Chez TSR that I would never be able to top last month's nom, but I offer, regarding a Hitler quote I posted:
.
That is an historic novum you are presenting here. I am very curious as to what source you can offer to back up this claim that Hitler said anything like that. Probably another TSR lie.
.
If you would have known the source you would have told me, to score a point. But from the fact that you remain mysterious about the source (it probably is your ***) we can be almost certain it is another lie. He knows it is a dubious source, he simply tries it. OMG.
.
I do not pronounce it fake, I pronounced that Taylor pronounced it fake.
.
Now just to be certain, we are talking about the document at the bottom of this page, right?

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=1458445#p1458471
.
Part of the irony here is that Niner's "source" isn't his source, but instead what someone *else* said an almost completely discredited historian said, that by the time zie made the latter 3 posts, zie had been offered *5* other sources, and that the document zie tries to confirm is the one we're talking about doesn't even contain the quote in question.

denier "scholarship" in action.
.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, right engines are a different type from left engines.

Holy ****, he's just broken new ground in stupidity. When asked why the wrong type of engine was planted at the WTC, he replied:

Because the perpetrators didn't perhaps have access to the right type of engine.

Brilliant. They can persuade the airlines to go along with their cunning nonexistent plane scam even though it virtually bankrupts them, but getting hold of the right kind of engine is just too much to ask, and then they're stupid enough to plant the wrong type rather than simply not plant one at all.

Dave
 
Last edited:
Foot shot!

:dl:


I'm almost positive that was intentional. I don't know why, but he's desperate to drive traffic to his blog.

Brilliant. They can persuade the airlines to go along with their cunning nonexistent plane scam even though it virtually bankrupts them, but getting hold of the right kind of engine is just too much to ask, and then they're stupid enough to plant the wrong type rather than simply not plant one at all.


When truthers go down this path, I always imagine the NWO planning sessions ending something like this: http://www.laineygossip.com/pics/gary.jpg
 
I'm not so sure - he made further posts to support his theory.

"PLUS, my research has shown that the flight path of Concorde was too close to some of the most important Reptilian hatcheries. I believe many Illuminae pre-hatchlings were killed by Concorde."

A Mod had to intervene because he was getting so much abuse from other posters.
What about the supersonic military aircraft? They'd outnumber the handful of Concordes hundreds to one:confused:
 
I've worked for people like that. It really just kills innovation. If I was Darth Vader I'd encourage a freedom to fail policy that got my spaceship commanders really thinking out of the box. We'd all have a symbolic ego deposit box by the door to the conference room and go in free to accept responsibility and analyze how we could have done things better. Then I'd totally choke the bastard.
I'd recommend the Mirror Universe agony booth. Discipline without attrition.
And fewer corpses littering the ship.
 
I'd recommend the Mirror Universe agony booth. Discipline without attrition.
And fewer corpses littering the ship.

I saw a hand bill in Frankfurt Germany with an add for something called the agony booth. Odd. It seems they wanted people to pay to enter it. Maybe it was a different kind of agony booth.
 
I'm almost positive that was intentional. I don't know why, but he's desperate to drive traffic to his blog.



He's mentioned before that he has some sort of scheme to make money at all this. I have no idea how he actually plans to do that, but there it is.
 
A subtle one here from Anders Lindman:



Apparently, right engines are a different type from left engines.

Dave

Well, to be absolutely nitpickingly fair, some piston engines come in left and right hand versions. It's useful to have engines on a twin counter-rotate.
Jet engines don't exhibit the P-factor phenomena that propeller airplanes do, so it wouldn't serve much purpose for them.
 
.
We had thought here at Chez TSR that I would never be able to top last month's nom, but I offer, regarding a Hitler quote I posted:

Part of the irony here is that Niner's "source" isn't his source, but instead what someone *else* said an almost completely discredited historian said, that by the time zie made the latter 3 posts, zie had been offered *5* other sources, and that the document zie tries to confirm is the one we're talking about doesn't even contain the quote in question.

denier "scholarship" in action.
.

I would be happy if 9-11 Investigator was known to me only through stundies. :(

Stundy questions: Are nominees notified of their nominations? Is there a real prize (aside from internet infamy) for the winners?
 

Back
Top Bottom