Chris Haynes
Perfectly Poisonous Person
Rolfe said:
Thanks... those are definitely more cool!
Rolfe said:
Thank you! My homeo fan is not so strong in English that I will make him plow through the transscript, but if I cannot find a more graphic illustration I will just try to describe it myself!Rolfe said:
Darat said:Apparently ME for one: http://www.otherhealth.com/archive/index.php/t-1117.html
i.e. 1 mole of solute per litre of solution.However, I think this thread has become very interesting. If we start with a presumed 1M preparation, could we make a list showing at which X potency each of these most virulent poisons would fall below the safe to consume level?
Well their little guide says this:Mojo said:This is getting confusing.
How exactly is this 1M preparation prepared?
What I think of as a 1M solution is what Hans is (I think) talking about here:i.e. 1 mole of solute per litre of solution.
So I read 1M on that site as a 1:1,000 dilution.Guide to potency scales
The X, L, C, or M refer to the number of parts of the dilutent (water and or alcohol) that one part of the mother tincture is diluted in. The letters are the roman numerals so X, L, C and M refer to 10,50,100 and 1000 respectively. The numbers refer to the number of times the tincture is diluted by that amount.
So for example, 6x = 1 part in 10, 6 times. So the final concentration is 1 in 10 x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10, or 1 in 1,000,000.
I think 1M = 1,000C - I'll try to find a link. You're right that it's certainly not "one molar" which is what real-world scientists mean by 1M.Mojo said:This is getting confusing.
How exactly is this 1M preparation prepared?
What I think of as a 1M solution is what Hans is (I think) talking about here:i.e. 1 mole of solute per litre of solution.
delphi_ote said:I've been suffering from an acute case of Darat for a long time, though I fail to see what the symptoms have in common with radiation poisoning.
Ah well, a cure is a cure. I don't seem to be able to find any plutonium preparations for sale online.
delphi_ote said:...snip...
And the machine only costs about $700! A few days to wait for shipping, a few instructional videos, a twist or two on the magic dial... POOF! No more Darat!
At long last, a cure!
Ashles said:Well their little guide says this:
So I read 1M on that site as a 1:1,000 dilution.
That seems to be how they are referring to it.
Click on "potencies"
Centessimal (1 in 100) (c)
Unless stated all potencies are centessimal. The common steps on this scale are 6, 12, 30, 200, 1M, and 10M. Other potencies are available - please contact us directly with your requirements using our free format order entry
Correct, 1000C equals (1)M. I posted a list of their silly dilutions here.Dragon said:I think 1M = 1,000C - I'll try to find a link. You're right that it's certainly not "one molar" which is what real-world scientists mean by 1M.
Interestingly this page from a homeopathic site says the following:Dragon said:I think 1M = 1,000C - I'll try to find a link. You're right that it's certainly not "one molar" which is what real-world scientists mean by 1M.
So this description is different from the above one (although maybe it is what the previous site was trying to say).Centesimal - one of three potency scales used in homeopathic pharmacy. It was the first potency developed by Hahnemann. 1 part medicinal substance (dry or tincture), mixed with 99 parts diluent (lactose or alcohol), and then succussed (shaken), yields the 1c potency. Taking 1 part of that potency mixed with 99 parts diluent, then succussed, yields the 2c potency. This is continued until the desired potency is reached. A 200c has gone through this process 200 times. A 1M potency has gone through this process 1,000 times. The higher the potency, the stronger the stimulation of the vital force.
I tried that numerous times in personal conversations, it never works with believers. There's still all these "vibrations" and "memory" things water performs, you know.Ashles said:*snip*
Surely the best way to dissuade anyone from ever using homeopathy would just be to explain it to them in detail.
Most of the believers who can think at all have pretty much given up hope on water memory and are now into quantum theory. And I got several more papers where that one came from, if anyone can take the insanity. The joke is that I keep seeing homoeos declare that Milgrom's "research" has "proved" that homoeopathy works by quantum mechanics, while the actual papers (that's just the first of three) have not a single experimental result in them, or even description of any experiment - they're admittedly only a "metaphor", and all 50-odd pages can be summarised as "if Plank's constant didn't exist, maybe homoeopathy could be sort of quantum, man".Garrette said:Just a thought, but if memory is the issue, then why do the homeopaths continue diluting it after the avogadro limit? They're not diluting anything physical so do they argue they're diluting a memory?
Wonder if that could be tossed into the debate with the believers.
The homoeopath I mentioned earlier, in a letter from bizarro-land published in the Veterinary Record, stated that a homoeopathic 1M potency was a dilution of 10<SUP> -2,000</SUP> of the mother tincture. (And that 10M was 10<SUP> -20,000</SUP> of the mother tincture.)Dragon said:I think 1M = 1,000C - I'll try to find a link. You're right that it's certainly not "one molar" which is what real-world scientists mean by 1M.
Do it tomorrow, honest injun. I screwed up my Mum's flight booking (apparently I can't get the words "Gatwick" and "Glasgow" the right way round on a booking form), as a result of which she was stuck at Abbotsinch (in the Executive Club Lounge, being fed tea and sandwiches by sympathetic BA staff so it wasn't all bad) for two hours this afternoon. I need to go and be solicitous for a bit to atone.Ashles said:Rolfe this is fascinating stuff. Thanks for this info, and in advance for the calculations you're doing later.