• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

I googled the words in bold and the very first result answered your question. Why didn't you spend 10 seconds and attempt to find the answer yourself? Can your credibility on this message board get any worse?
 
I'm thinking about it, and I'm becoming increasingly sure it's not just wrong, but beyond wrong - a whole new class of wrong that I'm going to have to label anti-right.

Who precisely is better qualified to work out whether a burning building is going to collapse by looking at it?

Sure, I'll grant you that in the controlled and contrived circumstances of material scientists' failure tests they would have a better idea of what's going on in the invisible innards of a beam or a test rig.

Loss adjusters, disaster engineers, safety inspectors and so forth are all probably brilliant at meticulously examining a husk and working out what is salvageable, and what to do about the rest.

But in the circumstance where you have an actual, real life, still burning building, and you want to know whether it's going to collapse, who on God's Green Earth else would you ask but a fireman?
 
Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

theauthor said:
That's actually a good point. Fireman are without doubt brave and committed but they are not in any sense experts on building collapse, especially in a situation that had never been encountered before.
Click to expand...

both of you are utterly disgusting. I have several friends who are firefighters; one is a doctor who became a firefighter after switching careers and one is an electrical engineer; both their expertise helps in what they do every day.

You do know the rigors of becoming a fire fighter? Trust me, they are definitely smarter than the whole 911 liar movement.
 
Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

Here's my suggestion. As a member of the Truth Movement, you are obviously interested in spreading the Truth. Above, we have a quote of what you consider to be the Truth. Since it is your duty to disseminate the Truth, I think you should start with the one quoted above. Spread that Truth, Tweeter, spread it far and wide.

May I suggest you begin your quest in a firehouse in New York?
 
NobbyNobbs said:
Here's my suggestion. As a member of the Truth Movement, you are obviously interested in spreading the Truth. Above, we have a quote of what you consider to be the Truth. Since it is your duty to disseminate the Truth, I think you should start with the one quoted above. Spread that Truth, Tweeter, spread it far and wide.

May I suggest you begin your quest in a firehouse in New York?
Click to expand...

Id like to ask the firemen that said "there were a few small fires and they could take it down with a hose or two" a few questions. I already know enough firefighters that couldnt chew gum and walk at the same time, but im sure the ones in NY are all college educated with doctorates.
 
Pardalis said:
What are your qualifications Tweeter?
Click to expand...

From Wiki:

Particularly in these tales they come in any size and can be as huge as giants or as small as dwarfs. They are often regarded as having poor intellect (especially the males, whereas the females may be quite cunning), great strength, big noses, long arms, and as being hairy and not very beautiful (Once again, females often constitute the exception, with female trolls frequently being comely).
Click to expand...
 
Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

It takes a real man to admit his bigotry while standing in the lions den.

:wow2:
 
applecorped said:
Dictator Cheney:

You made a statement that WTC7 was a controlled Demolition. Please inform this forum as to how you arrived at your conclusion.
Click to expand...

I'm taking the liberty of bumping the OP for DC since he seems to be ignoring it, and I'm too impatient to wait for him to retract it.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
you all waiting for me to explain to you why i think the obvious controlled demolition of WTC7 was a CD?
are you all bored?
Click to expand...

Not bored, exactly, more curious as to why you think the way you do. Most of the other truthers who post in this forum (and this very thread is abundant indication of this) tend to be some combination of simpleton, lunatic, liar, and troll. There's really no point at all conversing with them, because as I suspect even you can see, they simply don't have the interest or ability to carry on a basic adult discussion. You, on the other hand, have demonstrated considerably higher levels of intelligence and emotional stability. Yet you still believe in something that for most of us defies all logic and sanity. So it's natural to ask: Why would a seemingly intelligent and stable person believe such a thing?
 
Last edited:
Tweeter said:
Id like to ask the firemen that said "there were a few small fires and they could take it down with a hose or two" a few questions.
Click to expand...

The firefighters who said:

"...we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones..."

had arrived at the 78th floor of WTC2, just below the main impact site. 78 had been hit by Flight 175's wing, it hadn't been hit by the fuselage. The main body of the South Tower fires were on the 80th floor and above. Having said that, there were still serious fires there since those same firefighters radioed down that they had numerous 10-45-Code ones, which means "serious fire related injury-victim deceased".

Tweeter said:
I already know enough firefighters that couldnt chew gum and walk at the same time, but im sure the ones in NY are all college educated with doctorates.
Click to expand...

Your infantile insults towards the firefighting profession and those who serve the public in it reek of ignorance and desperation.
 
Tweeter said:
Id like to ask the firemen that said "there were a few small fires and they could take it down with a hose or two" a few questions.
Click to expand...


Keep parading your ignorance for all the world to see. The fireman (not men) in question is dead, along with 242 other firemen who died that day. His remarks had nothing whatsoever to do with WTC7 and "two lines" means two full engine teams, or an entire fire house.

He also didn't say the fires were small; he said they were isolated.

Disgusting behaviour, as per usual.
 
Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

YOU WIN THE PRIZE!!!

troll_award.jpg
 
applecorped said:
Dictator Cheney:

You made a statement that WTC7 was a controlled Demolition. Please inform this forum as to how you arrived at your conclusion.
Click to expand...

Dictator Cheney said:
by thinking and reading :)
Click to expand...

From which you extracted the following evidence:
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________

(See, I'm making it easy for you. Just fill in the blanks. Just one teensy weensy scrap of evidence. Just one. Come on. You can do it.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom