• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

Still waiting for DC to back up his claim that wtc7 was a controlled demolition.

:popcorn1

So far he said something about "seeing it and thinking it was".
Thats not very persuasive argument though.
 
Last edited:
applecorped said:
:jaw-dropp

Are you serious?
Click to expand...

Tweeter proved a long, long time ago he's not serious about any of this. He's strictly out to push people's buttons.

And to be honest, he's pretty good at it. It's why he's never been added to my ignore list. :D
 
scissorhands said:
Still waiting for DC to back up his claim that wtc7 was a controlled demolition.

:popcorn1

So far he said something about "seeing it and thinking it was".
Thats not very persuasive argument though.
Click to expand...

you think it was not a CD?
 
Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

[edited]

Masking profanity and being extremely uncivil.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MarkyX said:
So you think the NIST report is accurate on the twin towers? Alright, so why are you expecting them to be wrong about WTC7?
Click to expand...

Why did you assume I had rejected it and state it as fact?

I expect them to be wrong because, like you, they have no idea how they can produce a credible report that has 7 collapsing due to fire.
 
scissorhands said:
We are all waiting for you to explain why you think it was, DC.
You think it was a CD.

Produce your evidence.
Click to expand...

you all waiting for me to explain to you why i think the obvious controlled demolition of WTC7 was a CD?
are you all bored?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
You are all waiting for me to explain to you why I think the obvious controlled demolition of WTC7 was a CD?
Are you all bored?
Click to expand...


If I say yes, will you stop dancing long enough to answer the question?
 
Last edited:
Dictator Cheney said:
you all waiting for me to explain to you why i think the obvious controlled demolition of WTC7 was a CD?
are you all bored?
Click to expand...
We are waiting for you to produce actual evidence that proves it was a CD other than "it looks like it to me." You know, things like the sound of the explosive sequence, unexploded explosives, det chord, eyewitnesses to the placement of the explosives, motive to demolish the building, etc. "I saw it on YouTube" just doesn't quite work for us.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
you all waiting for me to explain to you why i think the obvious controlled demolition of WTC7 was a CD?
are you all bored?
Click to expand...

Bored of your prevarication and evasions from stating claims about 9/11 and defending them?
Certainly.
Nows your chance, having actually made a claim, to try to back it up.
Just think, you could actually have an honest debate?
 
Last edited:
Dictator Cheney said:
by thinking and reading :)
Click to expand...
Still no evidence. You read hearsay and glom on to the errors.

You reading and thinking have failed you. Try some facts next time.

You lack of logic is standard for 9/11 truth, who have all missed, that CD looks like gravity collapse, not the other way around, Gravity is the big mover for both.
 
Last edited:
theauthor said:
Why did you assume I had rejected it and state it as fact?

I expect them to be wrong because, like you, they have no idea how they can produce a credible report that has 7 collapsing due to fire.
Click to expand...

So you don't think that if column 77 or 80 failed around the 13th floor the whole building wouldn't have come down?
 
That's actually a good point. Fireman are without doubt brave and committed but they are not in any sense experts on building collapse, especially in a situation that had never been encountered before.
Click to expand...

Actually firemen are well versed in building collapse - it you dont you get killed. Since
day 1 of fire training it is pounded it that building collapses kill firemen - classes in
building construction are regular part of course. Updates are applied as construction
techniques change. Just yesterday our chief circulated photos of fire last week in
neighboring town of condo fire which burned out floor supports - anyone walking on
floor would have falled into fire.

I took several courses given by FDNY chiefs including one only months before 9/11 which
outlined signs of building collpase.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
you all waiting for me to explain to you why i think the obvious controlled demolition of WTC7 was a CD?
are you all bored?
Click to expand...

Yes. I am quite bored. Now please explain why you think the collapse of WTC7 was a CD. Remember to provide evidence as well.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
how they know when they got pulled ?
Click to expand...

theauthor said:
Fireman are without doubt brave and committed but they are not in any sense experts on building collapse, especially in a situation that had never been encountered before.
Click to expand...

To state that firefighters are ignorant in judging structural stability is beyond ignorant. Their very lives depend on them being able to do so. And if you still insist on maintaining this preposterous delusion, you'll need to offer an explanation why the FDNY was granted sole authority to assess and establish safety zones around WTC7 and call for its eventual evacuation. It seems a little odd that the city of New York would entrust such a duty to an organization that lacks the requisite knowledge.

However, even if the firefighters on the scene lacked the ability to assess the stability of WTC7 as you so ignorantly claim, it still doesn't explain why after six years they unanimously agree that its collapse was caused by debris damage and fire. If Youtube super-sleuths like yourselves can figure it out it was a controlled demolition, why can't the seasoned professionals that witnessed it firsthand do the same?

So my question remains: Why doesn't the FDNY agree with the assertion that WTC7 was a controlled demolition?

Despicable as he is, at least Tweeter has the stones to state the logical conclusion to his warped line of reasoning. DC and theauthor, what about you?
 
Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

Where do you think building fire codes originate from? Are you that ignorant? No you don't need to answer that you prove it with every post.
Every project I build must be inspected by .. Guess who? A fire sub code official who is or was a fireman. And who was it who aimed a transit onto building seven to assess its condition? Wasn't an engineer was it? It was a fireman.

tweeter please continue to post here. It helps reveal the stupidity and ineducable ignorance of the truth movement.
 
njslim said:
Actually firemen are well versed in building collapse - it you dont you get killed. Since day 1 of fire training it is pounded it that building collapses kill firemen - classes in building construction are regular part of course. Updates are applied as construction techniques change. Just yesterday our chief circulated photos of fire last week in neighboring town of condo fire which burned out floor supports - anyone walking on floor would have falled into fire.

I took several courses given by FDNY chiefs including one only months before 9/11 which outlined signs of building collpase.
Click to expand...


But the Truth Movement has assured us that building collapse doesn't result from fire, so obviously firefighters are just given that training as part of the 9/11 coverup. And since they've been given that training for decades, the NWO must have been planning the 9/11 coverup for that long!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom