"... "Downplay the fact that free inquiry, legitimate disagreement and respectful debate are a normal part of science."
You can't win an argument on 911 because you have no evidence; you have failed opinions based on lies, hearsay and delusions spread by liars. Do you really support Fetzer and his beam weapon no planer insanity? You posted criticism of Fetzer; did you mean to slam Fetzer or support his insane claims.
Legitimate disagreements have facts and evidence; you have nothing. You bring no facts or evidence to make a respectful debate; you bring woo. You have no facts and evidence to support your delusion on 911. How scientific of you.
...
There has been a lot of evidence that supports alternatives to the OCT, but everytime it is brought up at JREF the "spin machine" revs up into high gear and brings out all the tactics listed on both lists and then some. ...
Where is your evidence? Another false statement to mislead others! Is this 334.15 ways?
334.15 - make up stuff and hope people feel the same way and ignore your lies and lack of evidence.
... Point to any thread here at the JREF 9/11 CT subforum where facts supporting alternatives to the OCT were brought up and I could easily point out those tactics in each and every one. ...
Truthers never brought facts; why? They complain, post lies, do what you are doing, and leave without presenting evidence for their claims.
... Why do you think so few people even bother to post here? Why do you think most "truthers" do not post here? You think it's because you are so superior? LOL, if your arguments could stand the light of day you might actually try publishing a book or an article that refutes the books and articles the Truth movement has published. Instead you all remain safely here at JREF and talk about how this and that source is garbage or delusional and how this and that publisher is not "scientific" or trustworthy or "garbage". ...
Why do you come here? To post false statements like this because you are upset you can't find one thing that qualifies as evidence so you attack with posts about why you lost arguments on 911. All your sources are garbage and you can't post evidence to save them from the pit of ignorance.
Dr. Super-nano-thermite-Jones is the most personable person while he spews lies and insanity on 911; not a good reason to believe him. It is the classic suspend skepticism he is a college professor he knows his stuff. He lies and then spawns people like Gage who are either dumber than dirt or in it for the money since he was laid off by the "NWO" evil empire run by PNAC and Dick-shot-my-friend-in-the-face-can't-cover-up-squat-Cheney. Dick is the massive army for PNAC and his wife took away his shotgun! Your position is total non-sense and you seem to ignore that fact. What drives your failed ideas on 911? Hate? Political bias? Need to apologize for terrorists?
... We few "truthers" that do post here do so knowing full well the reception we will receive without fear of that reception, because we know exactly what it means. If only you had the courage to try your tactics outside this environment.
Did you have a tactic meeting? Got a book on how to avoid posting evidence on 911 without really trying?
You have no evidence. If you understood the evidence you would not support liars. Post a truther conclusion verified with evidence.
There are few truthers here because intelligent people who fall for the lies of 911
TruthLies finally comprehend the 911Liars Movement is false information. They overcame their false ideas on 911 by using critical thinking, skepticism, knowledge, sound judgment, logic, and thinking for themselves.
