Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
Don't be more ridicuous than you have to be Dave. Let's not assume that TAM is correct. There must be 500 debunkers here on the jref alone nd many thousands on other forums. But I woudn't care a whit if the entire Truth Movement was only 10 people in total as long as we are being effective. And of course we are- more so every day. I think you guys feel that you can demoralise us by how few our numbers are. Have you noticed the tactic working well ? All I can say is please do carry on.
Click to expand...

You have an interesting definition of "effective".

The reason that there are so few "Truthers" and so many debunkers is that all the eyewitneeses know the Truth Movement" claims are silly. Everyone in aviation, structural engineering and demolition knows that the TM claims are silly, not to mention people in countless related fields of study. Everyone in the news media knows what happened on 9/11 and knows to give Truthers a pass when they see them coming.
 
Last edited:
SteveAustin said:
I can tell you that hardly a day goes by when I don't encounter someone who still has not heard that WTC7 fell on 9/11.
Click to expand...

Then you must be raising the subject daily, because few others will. Does this tell you something?
 
bill smith said:
But I woudn't care a whit if the entire Truth Movement was only 10 people in total as long as we are being effective.
Click to expand...

Five murders from ten people would, indeed, qualify as effective, though not quote as much as the effectiveness of the nineteen hijackers. So let's see your evidence that debunkers have committed six or more murders.

Dave
 
Macgyver1968 said:
Thanks jhunter, that was the one I was looking for....kinda..underwhelming..yeh?

The truthers could have learned something from their own little experiment....look how long, and how bright the thermite burns. I wonder why we don't see this in the collapse videos? he he
Click to expand...

That was 70 POUNDS of thermite, and it probably barely warmed the sign up while creating a glow that could be seen for miles.

And you have to remember the proposed therm*te was supposedly all through the buildings. If it was, the WTC would have been glowing like a movie marquee just before it collapsed.
 
jhunter1163 said:
That was 70 POUNDS of thermite, and it probably barely warmed the sign up while creating a glow that could be seen for miles.

And you have to remember the proposed therm*te was supposedly all through the buildings. If it was, the WTC would have been glowing like a movie marquee just before it collapsed.
Click to expand...

But the sand bags and blast mats used as noise abatement for the explosives, doubled as shields so people would not see the thermite burn!
 
bill smith said:
Who can smell the desperation ? lol. If they are ever going to try and set up the Truth Movement it will be sometime soon. Don't be surprised if we see a flurry of this kind of reporting followed by a 'crazed Truther' episode or episodes of some kind. It must just kill them that we are and have always been so passive They have not had a chance to launch any kind of draconian anti-Truther measures. Glenn Beck is so completely off the wall here that it must be manifestly obvious even to the most hardened Shill just how much trouble they are in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...www.911blogger.com/&hl=en&v=lUTATYaIZYI&gl=US
Click to expand...



Actually, the concept of a passive lynch mob makes us laugh.
 
jhunter1163 said:
That was 70 POUNDS of thermite, and it probably barely warmed the sign up while creating a glow that could be seen for miles.

And you have to remember the proposed therm*te was supposedly all through the buildings. If it was, the WTC would have been glowing like a movie marquee just before it collapsed.
Click to expand...
Remember it was super duper nano-Thermite (or was it Thermate as Jones concluded early on? Hmmm). Able to turn steel into vapor in one fell swoop and angle cut huge support beams at 45 degree angles. ;)
 
bill smith said:
Don't be more ridiculous than you have to be Dave. Let's not assume that TAM is correct. There must be 500 debunkers here on the jref alone nd many thousands on other forums. But I woudn't care a whit if the entire Truth Movement was only 10 people in total as long as we are being effective. And of course we are- more so every day. I think you guys feel that you can demoralise us by stressing how few our numbers are. Have you noticed the tactic working well ? All I can say is please do carry on.
Click to expand...

What a crock. There are no 500 debunkers here. Yah, there may be 500 or more members who do not believe the theories of the truth movement, but a debunker is someone who is ACTIVELY engaged in refuting the theories...100-200 tops here.

As for thousands elsewhere...yah right, that you will have to prove to me, cause I highly doubt it.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
What a crock. There are no 500 debunkers here. Yah, there may be 500 or more members who do not believe the theories of the truth movement, but a debunker is someone who is ACTIVELY engaged in refuting the theories...100-200 tops here.

As for thousands elsewhere...yah right, that you will have to prove to me, cause I highly doubt it.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't fit in as a debunker. I don't think a lot of us do. Only the ones with the expertise who actually work on refuting the garbage truther theories are real debunkers, and I don't qualify there just for throwing a flag when a truther posts brain-dead junk. But we're referred to as debunkers because those who believe the truth movement's lies just have to put labels on the people who don't agree with them.
 
bill smith said:
The Isreali/9/11 connection is super sensitive and I tend to leave it alone these days. There is still planty of meat on the bone with the rest of it. All roads lead to Rome they say.
Click to expand...


I have a sick feeling I know where bill smith is headed, and it ain't pretty....
 
240-185 said:
Look at the reliability of the Bentham papers...
Click to expand...

Outstanding :D

So : "In this section, we discuss existing research into red-black trees, vacuum tubes, and courseware [10]. On a similar note, recent work by Takahashi suggests a methodology for providing robust modalities, but does not offer an implementation [9]."

is just as acceptable to Bentham as Jones' piffle. Well, that makes sense when you think about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom