armageddonman
Muse
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2001
- Messages
- 501
Richard G said:Even more challenging, are the fellows that bow hunt. That is the ultimate test of ones hunting skill
Great. Killing animals for fun. That is REALLY a great "sport".
Richard G said:Even more challenging, are the fellows that bow hunt. That is the ultimate test of ones hunting skill
An arrow doesn't "clinically dispatch" an animal.
Besides that, an animal that lives is certainly happier than his fellow that was killed by someone who gets a kick out of doing so.
That an animal lives is beside the point. It will die sometime.
Shane, by your logic- it would be fine for me to shoot you since you are going to die at some time anyway.
Shane Costello said:So maybe you should stop and think before mindlessly peddling the PETA line.
Shane Costello said:Undercover Elephant,
You're forgetting that one part of the UK, Northern Ireland, is creaking under the weight of illegal firearms, and despite Tony asking them very nicely, the murder gangs don't want to give them up.
Maybe true, but I think NI is a bit of a special case.
The intention of the hunter is NOT sparing the animal from a painful or miseable death but to enjoy killing it.
I totally agree that there are cases where hunting is neccessary, e.g. to keep the population on a healthy level, but hunting for "sport" is IMHO plainly wrong.
Shane Costello said:Originally posted by Jon_in_London:
Sweet Divine, we should start a "Strawman of the Year" competition around here!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How on earth could my point about the harsh realities of the natural world be construed as an endorsement of the culling of old, infirm and terminally ill members of society! Are you drunk?![]()
Not a strawman. Its what your logic implies.
btw- Im not drunk yet but Im doing my best![]()
The intention of the hunter is NOT sparing the animal from a painful or miseable death but to enjoy killing it. I totally agree that there are cases where hunting is neccessary, e.g. to keep the population on a healthy level, but hunting for "sport" is IMHO plainly wrong.
Great. Killing animals for fun. That is REALLY a great "sport".
IIRC recreational hunting is an integral part of conservation efforts to keep animal populations at manageable levels.
Don't be a jerk. USA has higher non-firearm homicide rates, too. Yes, USA has a cultural problem, but guns ain't it, nor are the gun owners.No, [USA's anomalously high firearm homicide rates says] something useful about being trigger-happy gun freaks.![]()
Richard G said:
Holy ◊◊◊◊, what an incredible amount of ignorance being displayed here. We are at the top of the food chain. We are natural predators. I eat everything I kill. Where do you think that Big Mac comes from? Think they grow that stuff on trees buddy?
People today are so far removed from the food chain, unless its pre-packaged in a styrofoam box for them, they would be too stupid to go out and get it.
Richard G said:We are at the top of the food chain. We are natural predators.
I eat everything I kill. Where do you think that Big Mac comes from? Think they grow that stuff on trees buddy?
I thought it was clear that I was referring to those hunters who hunt for sport. Besides that, I don't eat Big Macs or any other meat.
UndercoverElephant said:The rate of Americans firearm homicides is not because of the availability of the guns