shanek said:
At least that much we agree with.
What do you think of the fact that 2.4 million crimes are prevented every year in America by armed citizens?
When I go hunting, I prefer to use Daisy cutters. Sure, its expensive to call in air support, but hey, I live for the thrill of the hunt. (Plus, the food is already cooked by the time I find it.)Occasional Chemist said:I prefer using harsh language to hunt grizzly bears. You've really got to cuss like a sailor to take down a grizzly.
Actually, there is plenty of evidence that humans are designed to eat meat (not exclusively, but as a part of our diet)armageddonman said:We are neither. We have laughable claws, teeth and sense of smelling.
Valmorian said:
Just curious, but where does this figure come from and how do they reach it?
armageddonman said:
We are neither. We have laughable claws, teeth and sense of smelling. How many animals have you caught and killed using only your hands and teeth?
"We're a little old to be playing dress up, aren't we Dr. Lott?" weblogger Julian Sanchez asked the gun rights advocate. Lott, scholar of the anti-big-gubmint American Enterprise Institute and author of More Guns, Less Crime, had used the fake identity "Mary Rosh" to promote his research.
Mahatma Kane Jeeves said:
Mahatma Kane Jeeves said:Criticisms of his findings here:
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/guns/lott/lott.html
Shane, by your logic- it would be fine for me to shoot you since you are going to die at some time anyway.