Two theories, Little 10 Toes ?
I thought that I was working on the "skin of a huge reptile" idea.
Obviously you have interpreted a second one, could you please enlighten me as to what it is.
And so far we have only agreed that "geology is a field subject", so if some concensus is to be arrived at it, is best done on site.
I am avoiding the "spellcheck" in an attempt to improve my spelling, so you will have to live with it.

Buzz, I was talking *to* you, not *about* you. Let's break this down so you can understand. *You* believe that the geologic structures have been created by some sort of " serpent " with wings and hands sheading its skin. Two other members have posted their opinions on how the structure was formed naturally, but you have rejected them.
*I* am too lazy so *I* am avoiding spellcheck for *my* message.
Let's talk about your serpent with winged hands for a few seconds.
You've shown pictures with holes in the ground and claim that your snake made them with bat-like wings. The holes are oddly circular. Wikipedia's entry on bats talks about their wings
here. "The finger bones of bats are much more flexible than those of other mammals. One reason is that the
cartilage in their fingers lacks
calcium and other
minerals nearer the tips, increasing their ability to bend without splintering. The cross-section of the finger bone is also flattened instead of circular as is the bone in a human finger, making it even more flexible. The skin on their wing membranes is a lot more elastic and can stretch much more than is usually seen among mammals." Well, if batwings have flat bones, why are the holes circular. You were the one that pointed out how round they are. And how come there aren't any imprints/distortions of the membrane around the holes. Wait, I know, it was
this bat that made the impressions.
Let's also take a look at the " sculpture " that the " serpent " made. (msg # 289). You say, "It seems the creature was a budding sculptor . In this formation it created a profile image of the lefthand side of its head . It is designed to be read by sonar as a dolphin would do [...]". Just skipping over the whole, "Prove there is a serpent", "prove the serpent has a abstract sense of art", "prove the serpent did the sculpture", "how could it look at a part of its face", and "what tools did the serpent use". Why would a serpent want to use sonar to see the sculpture? I know, it's because bats can't see. (I'm using bats because your creature has bat like wings)
Nope. Wikipedia mentions
here, "By emitting high-pitched sounds and listening to the
echoes, microbats locate prey and other nearby objects. This is the process of echolocation, an ability they share with
dolphins and
whales. [...] Although the
eyes of most microbat species are small and poorly developed, their sense of vision is typically very good, especially at long distances, beyond the range of echolocation. It has even been discovered that some species are able to detect
ultraviolet light. Their senses of smell and hearing are excellent."
Wikipedia says
here about dolphins (since you used them as an example): "Most dolphins have acute
eyesight, both in and out of the water, and their sense of
hearing is superior to that of humans."
And funny how you mention that the serpent created the picture to be "read" by sonor and yet doesn't sonar and vision work the same way. What looks closer to me with light, won't it still be closer to me with sonar?
Here's something that has been bugging me for a while. You said in msg #70 you chant using a
Fibonacci sequence (0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ...), but even giving you the first number, OM MANAE PADMAE HUM only equals 1, 1, 2, 2, 1. So, you're either wrong on your chant sequence and go nowhere, or you use OM MANAE PADMAE HUM and go somewhere else.