• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Buzz lightyear and the JREF Challenge

I believe ;) that buzz has completely proven beyond a reasonable doubt that this planet was excreted by a flying dragon. So let's end this argument and allow buzz the ability to travel the world and let everyone else know. How 'bout it? Can't we just agree that there is no other logical 'splanation to this planet other than a giant serpent excrerin' it?

Please? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Naughtyhippo said:
For starters, if the weathering is different; then perhaps they are NOT the same rock?
Click to expand...

Does the font size change mean that you are whispering Naughtyhippo?;)

And it is the same rock,....... white sandstone.
So that buggers that explination, what else would you like to try?

Something new, please!
 
White sandstone? That's not a rock type I'm familiar with, care to eludicate for me? Is the grain size, sorting and composition identical? Is cross-bedding present? Has the over burden always been identical?
 
Last edited:
Naughtyhippo said:
White sandstone? That's not a rock type I'm familiar with, care to eludicate for me? Is the grain size, sorting and composition identical? Is cross-bedding present? Has the over burden always been identical?
Click to expand...

Well Naughtyhippo, as I discussed the answers to these questions in the post that was removed by the mods because it was............................ AH Hmmm...."off topic", most answers to similar question can be found here.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75675

This was the original thread in this sub forum but someone from the brains trust decided to merge the "Buzz Lightyear and the JREF challenge" thread here, so I have no idea what could be considered "off topic".

As for the "interesting stuff", what would you like to know?
 
buzz lightyear said:
I discussed the answers to these questions in the post that was removed by the mods
Click to expand...
You discussed nothing; you made the usual unsubstantiated assertions.

most answers to similar question can be found here.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75675
Click to expand...
Not from reading your posts.

I have no idea what could be considered "off topic".
Click to expand...
If you really don't know what was wrong with that post, you shouldn't be allowed in mixed company unsupervised.

As for the "interesting stuff", what would you like to know?
Click to expand...
How about: Do you have any actual evidence that any of your assertions have any basis in reality?
 
Paul said:
You discussed nothing; you made the usual unsubstantiated assertions.

Not from reading your posts.

If you really don't know what was wrong with that post, you shouldn't be allowed in mixed company unsupervised.

How about: Do you have any actual evidence that any of your assertions have any basis in reality?
Click to expand...

Paul, use enough "ethnogens" and you will understand buzz lightyear's "wisdom".

:) It's true. :)
 
GzuzKryzt said:
Paul, use enough "ethnogens" and you will understand buzz lightyear's "wisdom".

:) It's true. :)
Click to expand...
Ah! 'ethnogens', it was much more fun when he conflated everything he didn't know about different mythologies into one enormous, gently steaming, heap of psychedelic mystical flapdoodle.

:hypnotize
 
Paul said:
snip!
Not from reading your posts.

If you really don't know what was wrong with that post, you shouldn't be allowed in mixed company unsupervised.

Snip!
bolding mine.

* Gently chiding* Now, Paul, Do you know for sure, that BL's a leg-humper?:D[/I]
Click to expand...
 
Naughtyhippo said:
Serpernts! Dragons! Squamatus corphological creation!

Are the dragons still with us? Are they benevolent?
Click to expand...

Have been chewing over these questions, Naughtyhippo.
The geology is easy, it is just like reading a book, but how the creatures relate to us is a bit more tricky.

There is also the problem that some clown from the forum management combined a few different threads into this one, so this discussion probably is in the incorrect sub forum.

Anyway as I see it, we are a byproduct of these serpents.
Our consciousness could be considered to be the ripples created by the creatures presence.

They exist in a parallel dimension ahead of us in time and we come into being as their residues grind the flow of time around the earth.

As for "Are they benevolent?", I don't think they consider us to be anything more than "carbon based water bags"(I think that was the description used).
Just as we have little or no regard to the parasites that live on our own bodies, until they get out of hand, they hold us in similar contempt.
 
buzz lightyear said:
Couldn't let this thread die without at least addressing this post ,Tricky.

Don't you find it just a little ironical that you push the "geology" book learning thing as some "be all", when it was the absence of this that allowed James Hutton to make his original observations.

He was just an interested person that saw what was there, no preconceived ideas. And he is reputed to be the father of the geology that you push.

Can you see what you are doing?
You look at a formation, cast you "knowledge" over it, compare it with something you know about, and call it quits. No questioning or thought.
As a geologist, Hutton would be ashamed of you.

Look at this:


You say you have explained this all before. Well lets recap.

Dried mud!
No mud ever dried consistently in a heap 20 meters high......Debunked!

Stress relieved formation!
The stress would have been relieved at different rates down the heap not producing a uniform pattern........Debunked!

And lastly the old "natural" weathering.
Look at the bottom of the formation. See what "natural" weathering is doing, its just randomly falling apart..........Debunked!

Come on Tricky, you are supposed to be a skeptic, be one!
Be skeptical of the current geology beliefs, just as Hutton was..........THINK!
Click to expand...

I'm not convinced. I think it looks natural.
 
What in the name of everything that is holy, unholy or atheistic is this thread about?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom