• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bush Administration Science

jessicarabbit said:
Im suggesting the government would pressure them. We can't determine they are lying unless an independent investigation is conducted.
Click to expand...
So you want an investigation into the possibility that NIST has been tampered with, although there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that they have been tampered with?

You obviously don't pay taxes in the U.S.!
 
NIST and the WTC collpases will likely be examined by Engineering students aournd hte world for the next 100 years (conservative estimate). Do you think NIST could really produce something that was crap and not have it called out by every student over that period, in every country?
 
jessicarabbit said:
Have you asked every engineer in the country?

They are very unlikely to break ranks and come under fire and lose their jobs?
Click to expand...

If an engineer has evidence he would come forward.

If the CT world had any facts then engineer could help you.

Absent of facts you make up beliefs.

Beliefs and opinions do not usually count in scientific papers and research.

This thread topic is not even related to 9/11. CT guys reference and use the NIST report for numbers; I do not understand how CT guys can use facts from NIST as they see fit but fail to rebut or come up with their own numbers.

Like the numbers you never sourced in another thread. Your research is shallow and incomplete. Like this thread, you post something and do not give the extra you keep in reserve to tease along others slowly feeding out you information or making it up as you go. It is painful, waiting for your next idea about your post you failed to put at the beginning, your entire piecemeal of ideas slowly trying to waste time so you can do what?

You will not even read this, you will just post another one line subject tangential to the topic.
 
kookbreaker said:
NIST and the WTC collpases will likely be examined by Engineering students aournd hte world for the next 100 years (conservative estimate). Do you think NIST could really produce something that was crap and not have it called out by every student over that period, in every country?
Click to expand...

They could omit and overlook evidence.
 
jessicarabbit said:
I am totally open to evidence. I read gravys paper and the NIST report. This study just makes me doubt government science publications.
Click to expand...
There are scientists outside America. Buildings are demolished outside America. Remember, pretty much everyone with access to a TV has seen the footage of the towers collapsing.

Why have no scientists outside America spoken out against the "government science publications" regarding 9/11? Not philosophy majors and psychiatrists. Relevant scientists with expertise in the field of what makes buildings fall down and what buildings that are being demolished look like.

It's not just "the experts say this is true so it must be true". It's "there are no experts saying this is false, so what reason do I have to think it false?" It's something I have never seen addressed by a CT.
 
jessicarabbit said:
When did I say that?

So you have a FEW opinions but boldly claim EVERY engineer agrees.
Click to expand...

the list of those who support CT is much easier to produce, it has only .00067 percent of all engineer in the US

Name your short list who support CT ideas on 9/11
 
Housefly said:
There are scientists outside America. Buildings are demolished outside America. Remember, pretty much everyone with access to a TV has seen the footage of the towers collapsing.

Why have no scientists outside America spoken out against the "government science publications" regarding 9/11? Not philosophy majors and psychiatrists. Relevant scientists with expertise in the field of what makes buildings fall down and what buildings that are being demolished look like.

It's not just "the experts say this is true so it must be true". It's "there are no experts saying this is false, so what reason do I have to think it false?" It's something I have never seen addressed by a CT.
Click to expand...

Well if they have only seen footage their opinion is worthless surely.
 
jessicarabbit said:
When did I say that?
Click to expand...
I believe it was here...
jessicarabbit said:
They are very unlikely to break ranks and come under fire and lose their jobs?
Click to expand...
You know, the part where you said that obvious flaws you claim are in these reports are being covered up by engineers too afraid to lose their jobs.
jessicarabbit said:
So you have a FEW opinions but boldly claim EVERY engineer agrees.
Click to expand...
No engineer publicy disagrees. Zero. Zip. Not even one crazy loon screaming at the sky. Your case is hollow. It's patently false. Experts know this and don't waste their time on nonsense.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Well if they have only seen footage their opinion is worthless surely.
Click to expand...


Couldn't have said it better myself.

That goes double for people with no relevant training or experience.

Take your own words to heart next time you espouse some ridiculous theory.
 
The NIST Report has been read by thousands of engineers. It is being used as a guideline for the future design of safety precautions in building construction. of those thousands of engineers who now use it, those who have read it cover to cover, how many have stated it is incorrect?

Or are all of those engineers bought off like you are suggesting the hundreds of NIST engineers and scientists were.

The number of people in on the 9/11 conspiracy grows larger.

Jessica, why do you continue to live in an America that refuses to come forward with the truth about the death of 3000 people, simply so they wont lose their jobs...tsk tsk tsk.

Where is that sarcasm smilie I requested??

TAM
 
R.Mackey said:
Couldn't have said it better myself.

That goes double for people with no relevant training or experience.

Take your own words to heart next time you espouse some ridiculous theory.
Click to expand...
Ouch. Jessica pretty much just dug the grave for her own theory there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom