....and if they attempt to demonstrate what's likely to happen they will be shouted down because "experts don't know anything".
I've said it repeatedly, somehow we've allowed ourselves to be convinced that a narrow referendum victory for a poorly defined outcome is somehow an enormous and ringing mandate for fundamental (and IMO catastrophic) change.![]()
This is also one thing they should be called out more often. There was no referendum on EEA membership and a good deal of Leave campaign mentioned EEA membership wasn't on the chopping bloc, should they win. Government decided UK was a member of EEA only through membership in EU, but this is something that could be challenged in court. Regardless of results of the lawsuit, some time would be gained as a result. Time is not on the side of Brexitards, especially if popular support for Brexit begins to wane. Some polls suggest there was a small but sufficient drop in support already in the summer.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-on-the-rise-since-brexit-vote-even-in-the-uk
Polls are all over the place, with one AOL poll of a hard Brexit having 15% support to a poll held by Sky news yesterday showing 51% support for leaving the common market. Such swings show the polls can be quite meaningless, but I find it likely that support for hard Brexit to be inversely proportional with the amount of knowledge a voter has about what hard Brexit will entail.
That's why educating people on what Theresa May just promised should be the cornerstone of any campaign for rationality. Educating and reminding them of what was promised beforehand - 350m a week is a prime example.
McHrozni
