Cont: Brexit: Now What? Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lothian said:
I believe it it because of our fantastic negoiciating ability and the ease we have in striking great deals for the UK.
Click to expand...

And of course the world will once again acknowledge the natural order that places the British at the top and flock to us to once again lead them out of their savage and heathen ways.
 
catsmate said:
Detail this "plan" please.
Click to expand...

To be fair there are two clear plans at the moment, one offered by May and one offered by Johnson. And I know a lot of people have made accusations that these plans are all over the place, contradictory, that they don't even know what they want and so on. But that is totally untrue.

May's plan is to remain PM, Johnson's is to become PM.
 
Darat said:
And of course the world will once again acknowledge the natural order that places the British at the top and flock to us to once again lead them out of their savage and heathen ways.
Click to expand...
America wants to become great again. They will never be Great America. We are still Great Britain, and post brexit we will be competing with the Greater Antilles to become The Greatest Britian, with the added advantage that it totally solves the Irish border problem.
 
Last edited:
Darat said:
To be fair there are two clear plans at the moment, one offered by May and one offered by Johnson. And I know a lot of people have made accusations that these plans are all over the place, contradictory, that they don't even know what they want and so on. But that is totally untrue.

May's plan is to remain PM, Johnson's is to become PM.
Click to expand...

And despite both of them being completely incompetent they seem to be achieving their plans. Apparently the two most popular politicians in the UK right now which only goes to show that the people of the UK are in general, ******* idiots.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Having a different opinion to yours. If leaving the EU is all about freedom, I'm struggling to see how not being allowed to have a different opinion to yours m akes me more free.
Click to expand...

It's important to quell the groundswell of realisation that this is a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ project, initiated by the amoral and supported only by racists and the extremely credulous.

There's a critical mass of realisation that could lead to actually stopping the damn thing and those that yearn for whatever the **** it is that Brexit is supposed to bring don't want the world catching on to the clusterfuckwittery of it all before it's too late to turn it around.
 
Archie Gemmill Goal said:
For example are South Korea going to offer us a better FTA than the one they already have with the EU?
Click to expand...

You don't understand.
If FTA's were that important then the EU would already have lots of them in place with everyone.
Since they don't, then they can't be that important, so we won't need them.

That there is Leaver-Logic, as far as I can tell from reading certain posts here.
 
ceptimus said:
The good deal is that we'll be free of EU rule. No one expects better economic trading with the EU. A price worth paying to be out of the corrupt EU, and the economic hit will be compensated by better trading with countries outside the EU.
Click to expand...
No, actually it won't.
 
ceptimus said:
The vote was to free the county from the EU. Not to damage it.
Click to expand...
Again untrue. The (non-binding, zero status) vote was to leave the EU. This meant leaving all the EU negotiated agreements, including tade ones.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Can't we just negotiate a FTA with the Channel Islands, then use our ignorance of geography to virtually relocate them to anywhere we want to trade with?

Dave
Click to expand...

Now this, on the other hand.
This, I'm sure, is something you could get all the nutters pro-Brexit MPs to sign up to.
 
Tolls said:
You don't understand.
If FTA's were that important then the EU would already have lots of them in place with everyone.
Since they don't, then they can't be that important, so we won't need them.

That there is Leaver-Logic, as far as I can tell from reading certain posts here.
Click to expand...

And it will be back to these mythical WTO terms but yet somehow getting better terms than everyone else in the WTO?
 
Dave Rogers said:
Can't we just negotiate a FTA with the Channel Islands, then use our ignorance of geography to virtually relocate them to anywhere we want to trade with?

Dave
Click to expand...

This would be genius but I think it would fall at the first hurdle. The Tories would appear incapable of negotiating an FTA with themselves let alone anyone else.
 
3point14 said:
Hence my considered, critically thought out position on those daft enough to fall for the lies of borderline traitors.

The evidence is now so overwhelming that this **** show is being supported only by the credulous, the poorly informed, the clinically idiotic and a whole bunch of racists who've been utterly fooled, hook, line and sinker.

It's a position arrived at through extensive critical thinking.
Click to expand...

ceptimus said:
The idiots that made that map can't even get the channel islands in the right place.
Click to expand...

Mid said:
Hang on geography has never been a strong point of mine but the channel isles are to the west of Normandy aren't they? Which is what's shown on that map isn't it?
Click to expand...



abaddon said:
Let me help you out...

Ot5Y42v.jpg
Click to expand...

No other comment
 
"In comments reported by the Politico website, he said: “I hadn’t quite understood the full extent of this, but if you look at the UK and look at how we trade in goods, we are particularly reliant on the Dover-Calais crossing.

“And that is one of the reasons why we have wanted to make sure we have a specific and very proximate relationship with the EU, to ensure frictionless trade at the border … I don’t think it is a question so much of the risk of major shortages, but I think probably the average consumer might not be aware of the full extent to which the choice of goods that we have in the stores are dependent on one or two very specific trade routes.”​

And who do you think "hadn't quite understood", none other than our guy in charge of negotiating our Brexit!

All at sea: Raab's ignorance of Dover-Calais stuns critics

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...france?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom