Archie Gemmill Goal
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 8,324
Well, firstly, nobody has blamed Corbyn for anything that Ken Clarke has or has not said, so this seems somewhat hysterical.
Secondly, it doesn't matter whether or not MPs scepticism of Corbyn is justified, the fact is that it exists and because of it he cannot command the confidence of the House. So the question becomes - if assigning blame is really the most productive way to look at the situation - is it the fault of that one person, or is it the fault of absolutely everybody else?
Well no somebody actually did blame Corbyn for the lack of evidence that KC can command a majority. So no not hysterical at all.
So far Corbyn is the ONLY horse in the race so yes, if he doesnt have rhe numbers its the fault of the people who wont bacj him.
If KC or anyone else came forward and said they have enough support to command a majority with Labour votes and JC refused then I would say that it is then him stopping things.
As it stands it isnt.
And we arent talking about absolutely everyone else we arw talking about Swinson and a couple of dozen independents.