Dan was a tremendous man, and a good friend.
Uhm...
I though about this also... Never wrote a letter about it because I would need to check if the idea is plausible. This would require at least some googling for... For... Hrm... *cough* D!ldos *cough* available back in the 60s... I would also have to write a post (pics included) about my findings. So, I decided just to let this whole issue aside.
Unless we decide to make a "Brokefoot Mountain" thread. Two (or three) cowboys alone in the woods...
OK, but would they dangle?Those were available waaaay before the 60th...
Class A...Here we have hit the motherload.
BFRO Class A report:
Forestry worker has various encounters.
Right next to Seattle, multiple bigfoots, males, a female, a child, sagging breasts, humps, talking. The child was only 6 ft, mind you.
Very reliable, yeah...BFRO Class A report said:my boss mike kinda had seen the shadows but tried to convince me it was his boss ken and some secretarys that he brought out into the woods that sometimes he does.
Cool, large eyes... Does it looks like Patty?*sniff* *sniff* Funky bigfoot gold, baby.
BFRO Class A report:
Weirdo 2004 Kansas 3ft sideways shuffling little white yeti/ewok thing.
With pictures!
Some people have been moaning about my term "Pattycakes". It simply refers to someone who believes the PGF shows a real Bigfoot.
Kinda like his own self-invented term 'scoftic'.Knights mused that the term connotates a childish game.
The obvious alternative is to refrain from using emotive/loaded terms and labels.This wasn't my thinking and instead I imagined a pancake. LOL. Nobody is being forced to use the term. The obvious alternative is something like "PGF Believer".
How about we just use 'lame'?"Suitnik" seems to work as a term to describe anyone who thinks the PGF subject is somebody in a suit or costume. I'll give you guys two new terms you can use for the special sub-category of Suitniks who believe that Bob Heironimus was inside the suit that is shown in the PGF. Around here, I might be the only one. You can call me a "Bobsucker" (suckered into thinking BH is Patty), or if you want to be less bawdy you can use "Bobster".
I also thought of "Heironimo" (think Geronimo), but it's just too stupid. Okay now "Heironopotamus". It sucks too...
Makes sense... The critter has a mid-tarsal-break, after all...Clayton Bailey Press said:Human males have a single penile bone; whereas Bigfoot has a triple-jointed bone that can make a "U" turn,
IMO...you're done responding to Kit's posts mostly because he's been tearing you a new one for at least the last several pages....meanwhile you keep saying things like...."I heard Meldrum say it differently"..."those are his words not mine"..."Waaaaaahh...William pulled my hair"
In sum...you have nothing.
I agree fully, Ray, that labels don't advance the argument. That said, while I'm not quite interested in all things Randi, I did rather like Randi brats.Sorry, I left my sense of humor at work yesterday.
RayG
Fair enough. Where did I misquote Meldrum? Are you arguing that he doesn't support Green's position on the lack of female sasquatch reports? Where was I dishonest?I do not find intelligent conversation or discussion in anything Kitakazee has had to say recently - mis-quoting someone, and recanting later only after its brought up that they are infact wrong with their source, is very laughable and far below that of anyone I would call credible or honest.
I choose whom I speak to, and I choose when.
I guess if proponents were trying to get us to buy into the idea of an extremely rare creature living in a couple of highly remote locations of the PNW then they'd be having less of a PR problem but that's not what's being presented. With the rise of the internet and the wide range of people who want to join the bigfootery role-playing game with sufficient tree cover in there locales we have the current joke they don't get being perpetuated.
Before living in Japan I lived in Victoria, BC on Vancouver Island which as I've discussed elsewhere is one of the classic sasquatch stomping grounds. To my surprise, according to this 2006-2007 BFRO class A report, I don't even need to look further than my own hometown to find sasquatch! They're living right there at the outskirts of the city! Thanks guys! Wow, don't I feel stupid.
That's the great thing about bigfoot, you see. We can't sit and nod our heads while listening to proponents carrying on about remote, vast, inaccessible this and that but not to worry, we're in luck. Bigfoot comes quite literally to our front door.
What's that, friend? Live in Des Moines, Iowa? Don't be so glum, we've got bigfoot for you! Here's a class A 2000 report featuring a sasquatch leaping into the air on a bike trail within the city limits of Des Moines. Sign up to the bigfoot website of your choice, grab your hat and bus ticket, snap some pictures of some mysterious sign, post 'em quick and SNAP! You're squatchin', buddy.
I don't have to worry about the lack of reports with females or infants. If I just find the right spot in my hometown I can get a friend to set up a webcam in the back yard and it'll just be a matter of time before one of them little rugrats comes ripping out of the forest with big mama chasing behind. Just you wait.
ETA: Well, there you have it. Correa has beaten me to it. He even posted a link to the Mangani map that I felt too lazy to do. I'll be retiring my oven mitts now.![]()
I agree fully, Ray, that labels don't advance the argument. That said, while I'm not quite interested in all things Randi, I did rather like Randi brats.
Bigfootery is a big, silly, hilarious mess. It doesn't quite rise to the integrity of a deep love of Dn'D. It needs a certain type of antagonism. It needs to be poked for the ludicrousness that it puts forth. The people that perpetuate it's silliness need to be taken to task for their data mining and fantasy play. If they continue to represent it as something more than fantasy, they should be expected to try and come to terms with all aspects of its silliness. They can call me a scoftic all they like. What they can't do is qualify that in any meaningful way that doesn't make their role-playing charades transparent. They can sit around and speculate if bigfoots keep pets and why they hate us or they can start to take a hard look at the whole thing. I don't see that happening anytime soon.
Bigfootery is a joke that its perpetuators just don't get.
Thanks Madness. William Parcher deserves credit for the bigfoot = RPG for adults analogy. I say analogy but I'm not even sure that's necessary. The bigfoot game is just too irresisistable. Bigfoot is reported in more places than cougars are. Kansas? Oh, there's no place like home, baby.
Go ahead, Credibilty Quest footer, and try and distance yourself from the RIBFRO or KBFRO dudes or whatever but you've been warned. Zeke is gonna pull his walkie talkies from the next New York expedition and he's gonna be at the same table as you at Honobia this year. You'll get to hear firsthand what everybody at his new RIBRC forum thinks of your slap to bigfoot research.