Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

Status
Not open for further replies.
But the first time you saw Patty the imposter from Dfoot you agreed it was a suit and not a real animal. How do you justify that with the statement above? You didn't think his picture, taken directly from the same film, looked like an animal.

I refer you to Diogenes poor attempt to support Dfoot.
 
Okay, Dfoot shouldn't have done it.

I agree with that.

However, he did do it.

So, we can move on to discussing what happened in reaction to dfoot's hoax.

If it's true that believers failed to recognize Patty and claimed that Patty was a suit, that's a grenade exploding right in the circle of believers, seriously damaging them.
 
I refer you to Diogenes poor attempt to support Dfoot.

That is not an answer to the question. Dfoot's credibility is irrelevant to my question.

How do you justify stating that you immediately thought Patty was an animal - and then when given a picture of Patty and told it was a suit, quickly agreeing that it was obviously a suit?

*If you did not say that the Dfoot picture was obviously a suit, I apologize and withdraw - I am assuming you did based on posts on this thread.
 
....If it's true that believers failed to recognize Patty and claimed that Patty was a suit, that's a grenade exploding right in the circle of believers, seriously damaging them.

They did recognize Patty.

That's how he got caught.
 
...How do you justify stating that you immediately thought Patty was an animal - and then when given a picture of Patty and told it was a suit, quickly agreeing that it was obviously a suit?....

That is not what happened.

...*If you did not say that the Dfoot picture was obviously a suit, I apologize and withdraw - I am assuming you did based on posts on this thread.

Please refer to Dfoot's parade of montages, photos, and other "props", the timeline of his posts, the reactions to his posts, and his final photo offerings which got him busted on the BFF thread "For Dfoot".
 
Huntster, you should just be mature about it and admit that you're not sure if Patty is a suit or not. You were sure convinced it was a suit when Dfoot told you it was... The only one who's credibility is smeared right now is you.

Let's face facts - the believers got schooled. They thoroughly demonstrated their personal biases, and that they really don't know if Patty is a man in a suit or not.

I applaud Dfoot's efforts, and am enjoying Huntster's desperate back-peddling and outlashing. It's amusing to watch.
 
You were sure convinced it was a suit when Dfoot told you it was........

That's a lie, not a mistaken claim.

The only one who's credibility is smeared right now is you.

Kiss my a$$, dragon-boy.

I don't like you, and I want all to know it.

..Let's face facts - the believers got schooled. They thoroughly demonstrated their personal biases, and that they really don't know if Patty is a man in a suit or not.

You're a damned liar.

I applaud Dfoot's efforts, and am enjoying Huntster's desperate back-peddling and outlashing. It's amusing to watch

**** you.
 
That's a lie, not a mistaken claim.



Kiss my a$$, dragon-boy.

I don't like you, and I want all to know it.



You're a damned liar.



**** you.

Acting like an 8 year old who got caught in a lie. How do you square this kind of behavior with your faith? I guess it is 'love thine enemy' - except for this one person who dared to call me on an obvious flub...
 
That is not what happened.



Please refer to Dfoot's parade of montages, photos, and other "props", the timeline of his posts, the reactions to his posts, and his final photo offerings which got him busted on the BFF thread "For Dfoot".

Could you provide a link to your initial reaction? All I have is Dfoot's reporting of you saying:

"HUNTSTER - * Photo not very clear; needs to be cleared up like Patterson film
* Legs too long and skinny
* Torso looks about right
* Arms too skinny, and not at similar length ratio with legs like Patterson subject"

Is this not accurate?
 
Acting like an 8 year old who got caught in a lie....

Nope. I'm acting like a mad bear who remembers somebody who has injured him in the past.

...How do you square this kind of behavior with your faith?...

I don't turn the other cheek.

...I guess it is 'love thine enemy' - except for this one person who dared to call me on an obvious flub..

Nope. I avoid my enemies.

When they come looking for trouble, I give them as much as I can.
 
Could you provide a link to your initial reaction?

I provided that link. Here it is again (Post #532).

....All I have is Dfoot's reporting of you saying:

"HUNTSTER - * Photo not very clear; needs to be cleared up like Patterson film
* Legs too long and skinny
* Torso looks about right
* Arms too skinny, and not at similar length ratio with legs like Patterson subject"

Dfoot is reporting my words?

Let me guess; by PM?

..Is this not accurate?...

Yes, those are my words.

Now go to Dfoot's post (#529, on the same link). Look at the figure in the photo.

That is the photo everybody is commenting on.

Is that the same image as what he posted in post #550?
 
So you don't like me... big deal. Looks to me like you're throwing a tantrum. Very mature.

Only makes you look more the fool.

You were tricked, and you don't like it. Too bad there's not a damn thing you can do about it.

But please, go ahead and post your childish tantrums. You're doing SO much for the skeptical movement right now... :D

'mad bear'... :dl:
 
**** you.

I love you too! :hug1:

Anyway, on to someone more interesting:

Dfoot, I will say one thing in defense of the 'Footies - those pics you posted were horridly dark and out-of-focus... At least we can see the one or two people over there that are honest about what they can - or cannot - see. I'd have liked to have seen you take more time and present clearer/crisper images (like the classic publicity stills) and then gotten their reactions.

Oh well - They're crowing a triumph for 'spotting the ruse'; we're crowing a triumph for 'unveiling their biases'; and Hunny-buntster is over here licking his wounds and growling impotently into the dark abyss.

Somehow, I don't think we'll ever get anywhere with the Cult of the PGF, do you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom