Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

[RayG]

Who else besides you, Ray?

Google is mah friend...

RayG

 

[bruto]

Do you actually think that anything less than a body will get humanity on track with regard to bipedal apes?

I for one would be well convinced by an honest and clear video or sequence of clear and focused photographs by a person like you, Huntster, or Lu. I'd want pretty fierce corroboration if the photographs came from a known member of the public bigfoot community, but an amateur with a good camera would do it for me. Get a clear shot of a Sasquatch that doesn't look obviously like a guy in a suit, preferably doing something that guys in suits would not be able to do, such as showing good facial detail, or detail of other anatomical features that would be hard or impossible to fake in a suit. Even, better, a nice clear video of a squatch ripping a dog apart and eating it raw would make me a true believer.

 

[UrsulaV]

Get a clear shot of a Sasquatch that doesn't look obviously like a guy in a suit, preferably doing something that guys in suits would not be able to do

Ya know, if someone could get good video of Bigfoot pooping in the woods on film, I think that'd probably do it for me.

Assuming they don't make monkey suits with poop chutes, which for all I know, they might, but it seems unlikely...

 

[Hitch]

Ya know, if someone could get good video of Bigfoot pooping in the woods on film, I think that'd probably do it for me.

Assuming they don't make monkey suits with poop chutes, which for all I know, they might, but it seems unlikely...

Trust me, you do not want to look into the possibility of poop chutes (or any other unusual opennings) in fur suits.

 

[RayG]

Ya know, if someone could get good video of Bigfoot pooping in the woods on film, I think that'd probably do it for me.

Especially if you have a poop dog.

RayG

 

[William Parcher]

Ya know, if someone could get good video of Bigfoot pooping in the woods on film, I think that'd probably do it for me.

That would be pretty convincing, athough I could imagine a Bigfoot costume that had a dump-hole pushing out black sausages.

How about a nice video showing a female Bigfoot nursing a baby? Then her other little scamp comes bounding up and plows into both of them. Mama whacks the naughty tyke on the butt, sending it sliding a few feet to teach it a lesson. Big mama Bigfoot then sees the human observer. She grabs a stone and hurls it straight at the camera. Then she gathers up her babies and carries them (bipedally) into the dense forest.

That would be a cool video that ought to kick things into high-gear with the scientific and skeptical community, eh?

 

[UrsulaV]

That would be pretty convincing, athough I could imagine a Bigfoot costume that had a dump-hole pushing out black sausages.

*groan* And then when you could see the shoddily done seams around the hole, we'd get Footers telling us that Bigfoot really has some obscure variety of hemorrhoids, or a prolapsed...um...

Okay, nix the Bigfoot poop film. There are things the world doesn't need.

 

[Huntster]

Dahinden immediately labeled one incident a hoax because he brought dogs there and they did not even react to the supposed tracks.....

How likely is it that dogs would not even react?

Very, very unlikely.

Maybe that's why Dahinden immediately dismissed that incident.

Your point?............

 

[Huntster]

Why humanity ?

Why not just a couple of skeptics ?.....

Plenty of former skeptics are "in the chase" now.

Just not you.

Perhaps you're self-centered?

I don't need a body ..

A good photo will do.. There should be thousands.. There are none...

There's the PG film. It's a damned good photo. It's even a moving photo.

As photography has gotten easier and easier, pics of supposed Sas, that are more than fuzzy blobs, get rarer and rarer..

So, show me a photo of a bear that you have taken.

Bears are all over (as has been discussed ad nauseum on this very thread).

Show me. Show me one that you have taken.

Got a camera?

Go into the woods, do you?

Show me something.

 

[Huntster]

Not sure I follow. Is he being classified not much of a hunter because of his willingness to shoot, or his reluctance to shoot?

Both.

He’s being challenged because he doesn’t seem to know what shooting another living being is all about. He doesn't even seem to know what finding another living being is all about.

Even today I'm amazed over people like yourself, not to mention the science industry.

Can you clarify 'people like yourself', so I'll know whether or not I belong to that particular group.

I’m referring to denialists. People who deny the possibility of the existence of sasquatch with vehemence and certainty, and without adequate consideration for things that may exist without someone providing proof of it for you.

You don’t seem to fit that characteristic, Ray. You challenge, yet leave possibilities open.

I'd hate to be remembered as a butcher of an extremely rare and endangered species............

Now Huntster, you're sounding like one of those Eastern folks that are into emotional preservation.

When it comes to bears, deer, elk, moose, etc, I’m into conservation and sound biological management.

When it comes to a bipedal primate, that is clearly very rare, I’m into preservation.

Especially when the only reason to kill one is to prove it’s existence to the likes of the “scientists” on this “scientific” forum, with them kicking and screaming the whole way.

 

[Huntster]

Who the heck says you have to hunt it to kill it, anyway? Track it to find out where it lives, or to take pictures, or to find scat, hair, etc.

Track it so that you can prove the footprints do in fact lead to an actual sasquatch, and were in fact made by the sasquatch you followed.

You don't have to want to kill one to want to follow it around.

Ever follow a deer around for more than a few minutes?

A bear?

Easier said than done, and that's with a species that is common.

You just don't have a clue, do you?

 

[Huntster]

That's it, I have had enough of this clown. On to ignore he goes.

Thank you.

Does that come with a guarantee?

Does that mean I won't have to answer your silly posts anymore?

 

[Flange Desire]

s'cuse me for buttin in here but ...

... The reports indicate that they fight, and do so well. So well that dogs are reluctant to run them ...

... so the dogs have have learnt from experience fighting sass?!

That seems highly improbable.

How many reports of sass fighting dogs?
The same dogs were involved in how many such incidents?

 

[Huntster]

I'm one of the very few on JREF and BFF that spells your name correctly. Betcha still don't love me for it

Yeah, I do. Good spellers are close to my heart!

Now, back to business!

 

[Huntster]

Why do bigfoot hunters bring dogs then? Patterson wanted dogs, too.

Which bigfooters bring dogs?

Where do they bring them?

My understanding is that they want to bring dogs, and want to bring them to some productive scent, but it just hasn't happened yet.

I read is that getting dogs to hot scent just hasn't happened. I suspect that is because dogs just ain't out there to get.

Am I wrong?

 

[Huntster]

Just noticed that ...

Did HunTster think I was referring to him ?

I wasn't.. I was referring to someone I know called ' Hunster ' , who also makes up excuses about not hunting for Bigfoot..

Small world, huh ?


Oh, well ...

Never mind that Hunster behind the curtain.

I'm the Great and Powerful HunTster!

Bring me the broom of the Wicked Witch of the West, and I'll grant your wishes......................

 

[Huntster]

I for one would be well convinced by an honest and clear video or sequence of clear and focused photographs by a person like you, Huntster, or Lu. I'd want pretty fierce corroboration if the photographs came from a known member of the public bigfoot community, but an amateur with a good camera would do it for me.........

Sorry, bruto. I don't buy it.

You seem to be a good skeptic, but I'm afraid that a photo won't do.

There are just too many personalities, reputations, theories, and ideologies to be surmounted with a simple photo.

Look what the PG film has wrought.

Unfortunately, it has to be a corpse.

That is the legacy of Man:

...I will not believe until I probe the holes in His hands, and put my hand into His side.......

 

[Huntster]

Ya know, if someone could get good video of Bigfoot pooping in the woods on film, I think that'd probably do it for me.

Assuming they don't make monkey suits with poop chutes, which for all I know, they might, but it seems unlikely...

I'd settle for a video of you ******** in the woods.

I'll bet it would be a smash!

Unfortunately, I'd have better odds catching a sasquatch doing it.

I know they ***** in the woods.

You?

I don't even have any evidence that you exist.................

 

[Huntster]

That would be pretty convincing, athough I could imagine a Bigfoot costume that had a dump-hole pushing out black sausages......

Written like a true denialist.

C'mon, William! Wouldn't a squatch squatting in the woods convince you?

I'm wasting my time here.............

 

[Huntster]

*groan* And then when you could see the shoddily done seams around the hole, we'd get Footers telling us that Bigfoot really has some obscure variety of hemorrhoids, or a prolapsed...um...

Okay, nix the Bigfoot poop film. There are things the world doesn't need.

If I get a video of a sasquatch ******** in the woods, can I deliver the product to you?

William? You?

Diogenes?

It would be worth a hoax attempt.