bigfoot is real I have the proof

[Creekfreak]

Thats a lie no expert you have provided has proven anything has been added to the photo

 

[Creekfreak]

Yes john is an artest and a very good one too . Whats your point ? are saying this man is trying to hoax you ?

 

[Locknar]

Okeedokee...I do believe I've finished my assessment.

I'd appreciate anyone pointing out glaring or not-so-glaring errors.

Ok...I looked over your so called "assessment", and I have some issues with all the "truths" you pointed out. Ok...just kidding.

Overall, I find your assessment correct in every detail. For that matter, it is consistent with what EVERYONE else has found.

Nice job (and nice site for that matter).

No lal you give it up . Get your facts straight before you start makeing acusations . Ok here we go first of all thanks for TRYING PC . What you have said is far from true .

Yet another expert that is "wrong" Creek? Seems rather unlikely that every expert you ask would be wrong...since every expert you ask has come to the same conclusion - branches and lighting causing a optical illusion (in the original), the "low res" photo has clearly been heavily edited.

As Ive stated before nothing I repeat nothing has been added or taken away from this photo not one pixel . So far no one has proven other wise so your still just speculating .

This is simply untrue. The "enhanced" photo has clearly been edited. The "high res" photo simply does not have a "Bigfoot", just branches and lighting illusion. This has been undeniably proven.

At this time its not a matter of if it is a bigfoot or not its a matter of honesty and intregrty and so far that has not been demonstraited by any of you .

EVERYONE here has been honest, and by and large given you the benefit of doubt. At this point, I can only conclude you are actually in on the "hoax".

Mine how ever has still not been proven to be anything other then what Ive said to be true . Yours on the other hand is very questionable .

Umm....no. The analysis of the folks here is correct and indisputable.

In a court of law I would win hands down in a case of slander if you would like to go that route then lets have some names .

In a court of law, you would be likely viewed as a extornishinst. You've tried to blackmail the State of Florida for money, as well as others such as DK for membership on his site.

Lt what is your real name ? Any one else what to clear your names ? If you cant stand behind your so called good names then you cant stand behind any of what you have said about this photo .

Nothing more then simply a sily "woo'er" challange.

You have been given the evidence but you have not proven it to be a hoax .

Yes it has been; your "enhanced" photo has been shown to be a hoax.

The files have been opened on the original photo and it has been shown that nothing has been added .

True, though that is not to say they show a "Bigfoot" either. Rather, the original clearly shows branches and lighting causing a optical illusion.

As to the rest of your post that I have been responding to; it is simply a nonsensical ramble that does not merit comment.

In the end, you wanted (I assume) a fair assessment of your "claims"; this has been done. You will never convince folks here of your "claims" with your current set of "evidence"; rather you will only continue to embarrass yourself should you continue.

 

[kitakaze]

Thats a lie no expert you have provided has proven anything has been added to the photo

Stop your evasion now, freak. You have dodged the issue every time I hang your lies in front of you. If you are not lying than you can easily answer these questions below:

Just another attemt at slander kit you have not proven this to be anything other then what I said it is . Its not only me your trying to slander its John and cliff you have gone a little to far with your acusations . You have been proven worng so just keep runing your mouth it will only be worse for you in the end .

How are those words from your extortion attempt to the State of Florida not outright lies?

Who are these leading photo experts in the country of yours and what methods did they employ in proving your photos to be legitimate images of bigfoot?

You are as usual lying. Badly.

Well, freak?

 

[Creekfreak]

A fair assesment has not been made that is very clear . No one has proven that anything has been added to this photo . It is not an optical illusion this is a solid mass not branches you still have not proven anything keep trying .

 

[Creekfreak]

I told them that to get there attention . I had what john said and what Dark said to back me up at the time you could say that it was just court room drama

 

[Locknar]

A fair assesment has not been made that is very clear . No one has proven that anything has been added to this photo . It is not an optical illusion this is a solid mass not branches you still have not proven anything keep trying .

This is a moot debate, as you are clearly unable or unwilling to listen and evaluate the comments/discussion of others. Based on the weight of evidence/discussion against your claims...it defies logic and reason for your continued unsupported comments.

Do you have anything new to add?

 

[kitakaze]

You will never convince folks here of your "claims" with your current set of "evidence"; rather you will only continue to embarrass yourself should you continue.

He'll continue, he's chosen the path of silliness as you said. I think Saruman's "elected the way of pain" seems more appropriate.

Towards resolution I would really like to get to the bottom of whatever involvement Mr. Russo had and I'm hoping that it will be just a matter of time before he visits here. I won't speculate now as to whether he was responsible for 'bigfootifying' the original image but I am fairly certain that freak did not do the work himself and that he's been aware that it's doctored for some time.

 

[Creekfreak]

yes I do lock untell the evidence has been proven worng none of you have a leg to stand on . Who is the expert you have provided ? All ive seen is a guy that has a photography hobby that has posted a few photos on a nice site . This does not make him an expert . On the other hand my person makes his liveing working with photoshop and other photo programs and is well known to the public . Who are you going to beleave ?

 

[Locknar]

Towards resolution I would really like to get to the bottom of whatever involvement Mr. Russo had and I'm hoping that it will be just a matter of time before he visits here.

Actually, I wish I had a camara to capture the look on his face when he starts to receive the flood of e-mails on this topic; the "What the %@#$!$@#$@" look on his face would be priceless

 

[Creekfreak]

there you go again kit makeing asumtions you cant back up . read this closely this is not a hoax by John myself or any other person involved

 

[kitakaze]

I told them that to get there attention . I had what john said and what Dark said to back me up at the time you could say that it was just court room drama

No, I'll say exactly what it was- flagrant lying in a frantically stupid extortion attempt to get the Florida government to finance your Woods and Wildmen play.

Thank you for admitting you were lying. Please immediately discontinue feigning innocence and speaking of honesty. Every time you do I will post the original fabrication with your above admission. If I'm really bored, I may even fire off an e-mail to Chuck Norris or Charles Bronson or whoever over there at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Department.

 

[Creekfreak]

yes he will most likly not like that . That is why I have tryed to keep his name out of it as long as I could so some class and not bother the man would you .

 

[grayman]

Creekfreak, You claim that Bigfoot is in the photo and so it is up to you to prove it. It is not for us to disprove. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

 

[Creekfreak]

go ahead kit ask them why they havent asked to see what I have .

 

[Creekfreak]

you havent disproven it all you have done so far is speculate the balls in your court to prove me worng its that simple . I say I am right you say I am worng now prove you are right . You cant do that so you keep trying to say I am lieing and trying to hoax you . That is becouse you have nothing to back up your statements . I ve been up front with everything you have not becouse your egos are so big you cannot admit you are worng .

 

[kitakaze]

yes I do lock untell the evidence has been proven worng none of you have a leg to stand on . Who is the expert you have provided ? All ive seen is a guy that has a photography hobby that has posted a few photos on a nice site . This does not make him an expert . On the other hand my person makes his liveing working with photoshop and other photo programs and is well known to the public . Who are you going to beleave ?

How unexpected, he's attempting to discredit PetersCreek.

there you go again kit makeing asumtions you cant back up . read this closely this is not a hoax by John myself or any other person involved

Yes, exactly what did Mr. Russo do to prove the images as a legitimate images of bigfoots?

 

[Locknar]

you havent disproven it all you have done so far is speculate the balls in your court to prove me worng its that simple . I say I am right you say I am worng now prove you are right . You cant do that so you keep trying to say I am lieing and trying to hoax you . That is becouse you have nothing to back up your statements . I ve been up front with everything you have not becouse your egos are so big you cannot admit you are worng .

Actually no; it is your job to support/prove your claim. You've claimed, as the title suggests "bigfoot is real I have the proof". We've seen your proof, and it (and you) have been discredited.

At this point, labeling this as nothing more then a very poor hoax attempt for money seems fair, based silly on your conduct.

 

[kitakaze]

Creekfreak, You claim that Bigfoot is in the photo and so it is up to you to prove it. It is not for us to disprove. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

*sigh* No, he does not. Never has:

you havent disproven it all you have done so far is speculate the balls in your court to prove me worng its that simple . I say I am right you say I am worng now prove you are right . You cant do that so you keep trying to say I am lieing and trying to hoax you . That is becouse you have nothing to back up your statements .

freak, explain why the assessments showing a hoax are wrong in specific detail using the various aspects of those assessments.

I ve been up front with everything you have not becouse your egos are so big you cannot admit you are worng .

Admitted liar:

These pitures have been analized by the leading photo experts in the country and have been proven to be legit .

I told them that to get there attention . I had what john said and what Dark said to back me up at the time you could say that it was just court room drama

 

[Locknar]

yes I do lock untell the evidence has been proven worng none of you have a leg to stand on . Who is the expert you have provided ? All ive seen is a guy that has a photography hobby that has posted a few photos on a nice site . This does not make him an expert . On the other hand my person makes his liveing working with photoshop and other photo programs and is well known to the public . Who are you going to beleave ?

Oh man...just to funny; really....you need to move to LA and become a comedy writer after their strike is over.

Lets see...who am I going to believe; someone that exists, or your non-existant "experts" supported by their non-existant analysis? Golly...that's a tough one.

I think I'll go with someone that exists; at least that is what Harvey (my invisiable giant rabbit) says I should do.