bigfoot is real I have the proof

Snow said:
Any fool can see that's Yellowhandle of the Redseat tribe ... most definitely not Bigwheel.

You just have to enhance the pic in Photoshop to see the blue eyes. Speaking of which, it is blatantly obvious the alleged "Big Wheel" tribal tattoo as shown has been Photoshopped by a friend of a friend of this bloke I met in a pub one night. Prove me wrong!!!111eleventyone!
Click to expand...

You are not accepting what is reality.

I know the type.

I bet the birds you take home from the pub are all a #10 in the morning also.;)
 
Snow said:
Reality is an empty wine glass. Why should I accept that?


Sez you, but in THE WRONG FONT!

#10 Downing Street?
#10 Knitting needle?

Or Ed forbid -

#10 Darning needle.

[This nonsense posted instead of kittens]
Click to expand...

This had me literally laughing out loud!!!

Thanks!!!
 
PetersCreek said:
Okeedokee...I do believe I've finished my assessment.

I'd appreciate anyone pointing out glaring or not-so-glaring errors.
Click to expand...
Sweet Zombie Jesus, I got tied up for a couple days and I missed all the fun! I see I have 10 or 12 pages to catch up with. I see PetersCreek has what appears to be the unaltered photo. Hey, schock! No bigfoot. Of course, by the time I get caught up with what I missed, there'll be about seven more pages.

LTC or Locknar or PetersCreek, could you give me a quick synopsis of the major details since about page 23? I'd really appreciate it.
 
Wow, thanks PC! That is a great piece of analysis & pretty much closes the case on this one (Kudos for DW too, for his part in this train wreck. You handled yourself quite well & raised my opinion of the BF crowd greatly)
 
PetersCreek said:
Okeedokee...I do believe I've finished my assessment.

I'd appreciate anyone pointing out glaring or not-so-glaring errors.
Click to expand...

Great job! No errors noted so far. I took the liberty of posting it on MABRC.

Your side-by-side settles a question I had about the branch being enhanced and I'm now disagreeing with me.

We were concerned last summer about an out-and-out banishment since Creek did have a few supporters on MABRC - right up until they saw the photo in the members' section. I think I can safely say he had none after that. His resignation saved DW the trouble and Creek some face, but then he tried getting back in under another SN and that account has been disabled.

This episode followed a couple of other banishments, also involving "enhanced" photos. I know DW doesn't like having to take such actions, especially with people who seemed to be friends, but what has to be done has to be done.

I looked up Creek's story on MABRC and he did say the chopper was over a creek running through a marsh. I don't know where "lake" came from, but in one picture of a chopper dipping water from a lake there was still a wash (it was posted by a former member of a USFS attack crew). We were divided on whether or not the chopper was added, but even leaving out that whole side of the picture, there's no question (or shouldn't be) the far right side was altered.

I have two words for Creekfreak: Give up.
 
Another Florida swamp ape bites the dust.

60826041.gif
 
No lal you give it up . Get your facts straight before you start makeing acusations . Ok here we go first of all thanks for TRYING PC . What you have said is far from true . As Ive stated before nothing I repeat nothing has been added or taken away from this photo not one pixel . So far no one has proven other wise so your still just speculating . At this time its not a matter of if it is a bigfoot or not its a matter of honesty and intregrty and so far that has not been demonstraited by any of you . Mine how ever has still not been proven to be anything other then what Ive said to be true . Yours on the other hand is very questionable . In a court of law I would win hands down in a case of slander if you would like to go that route then lets have some names . Lt what is your real name ? Any one else what to clear your names ? If you cant stand behind your so called good names then you cant stand behind any of what you have said about this photo . You have been given the evidence but you have not proven it to be a hoax . The files have been opened on the original photo and it has been shown that nothing has been added . LAL go back and ask dark if this is not true and stop slandering my good name . And one more thing LAL I did not try and enter the mabrc with another sn that name was shared by me and dark . Yes stumpknocker is also Dark . So like ive said get your facts straight before you come after me . I will not explain the reasons for why we did this that is up to dark to explain that to you . Feel pretty stupid now dont you ? Keep trying folks you will stumble on the truth and when you do it will knock your socks off if I remember right that is Darks exact words when he saw the photo the first time . Its very simple read the file of the original that Dark has posted if you cant read them then keep your mouths shut your just makeing your selfs look as stupid as LAL . Nothing has been added or taken away the files are right in front of your face smarten up and just read it . Somebody said your just diging a deeper hole for your self no thats not the case I have crawled out of the hole and now I am filling it with your programed minds .

You have been asked a number of times to keep your tone civil. Calling people "stupid" and threatening legal action are not civil.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Creekfreak said:
the creatures where pointed out to me by some one I sent them to before I knew they where there . I was telling her about the intresting few days I had starting with a turttle laying its eggs in my garden then ending with the fire .the reason for sending it to her was becouse she had never seen a place that aligators live and the photo with the choper seemed like a good one to post . I made the comment this is the kind of place where you will find aligators and if your luckey a bigfoot . she responded gosh did they get the thing out of there ? I then I looked at the photo more closely then saw what she was refering to . it is common knowlgage that in fact a lot of people have asked where is the bigfoot in the picture and they dont see it untell someones shows it to them . So this was just an over sight on my part I did not see it at first .
Click to expand...

ThunderFoot said:
Good question Drew, I knew it wouldn't talke long. A short time after talking the photgraphs Creekfreak came to my home and asked me to upload them to my compurter. I viewed them and I could see something but wasn't sure what. What I saw was the small one beside the bush. I then talked to Creekfreak and told him that something was there but was by no means conclusive and he agreed. Later that week I talked to another friend of mine and asked him if he could clean up the photographs so we could get a better look, and he did.

By the way I did talk to him last night and he did give me permission to give his name. His name is John Russo, he is the Art editor for the Panama City News Heareld. After John enhanced the photographs I then saw the larger one behind the small one. At this point I refered back to the orgianl and looked again.

Although you couldn't see the large one clearly you could see the silhouette of it. This leads me to have faith that John did in no way paste something in the photograph.

I am sure you will have a thousand questions from here on and just to let you know I am gong to work in an hour or so. I can not talk at work, that sux, but anyway that's the way it is. I will answer any questions I can. And I will tell you if I don't know the answer you are looking for.
Click to expand...
It has now been proven to my complete satisfaction that this was a (poor) hoax. It has also been shown to my satisfaction that as Correa and I discussed much earlier, this is a fabricated image based off an original pareidolic observation. While many may be satisfied to have seen the image comparisons and no for certain that it was a hoax I, for my part, would like to pin the hoaxer. With that in mind, assuming this is a real person I think efforts should be made to contact this John Russo and ask him to clarify his involvement in this attempted fraud.

I want to say specifically to darkwing as many others have that he has conducted himself in a most commendable manner regarding this charade. Also I greatly appreciate the efforts of darkwing, PetersCreek, LTC8K6, and others whose collective efforts have proven the hoax as such. This hoax was painfully obvious from the beginning and though no effort was required of any of us, it makes me proud to be part of a community of people that will expend time and resources to do so.
 
Creekfreak said:
. At this time its not a matter of if it is a bigfoot or not its a matter of honesty and intregrty and so far that has not been demonstraited by any of you . Mine how ever has still not been proven to be anything other then what Ive said to be true .
Click to expand...

These pitures have been analized by the leading photo experts in the country and have been proven to be legit .
Click to expand...
Liar. Fraud. Poor extortionist. I respond with your own flagrant lies in bold.
 
Just another attemt at slander kit you have not proven this to be anything other then what I said it is . Its not only me your trying to slander its John and cliff you have gone a little to far with your acusations . You have been proven worng so just keep runing your mouth it will only be worse for you in the end .
 
Creekfreak said:
Just another attemt at slander kit you have not proven this to be anything other then what I said it is . Its not only me your trying to slander its John and cliff you have gone a little to far with your acusations . You have been proven worng so just keep runing your mouth it will only be worse for you in the end .
Click to expand...
How are those words from your extortion attempt to the State of Florida not outright lies?

Who are these leading photo experts in the country of yours and what methods did they employ in proving your photos to be legitimate images of bigfoot?

You are as usual lying. Badly.
 
Creekfreak said:
You have been given the evidence but you have not proven it to be a hoax . The files have been opened on the original photo and it has been shown that nothing has been added .
Click to expand...

Where the hell are you coming up with this stuff? Every person who has looked at it has reached the same conclusion. There have now been two, for all intents and purposes, experts who who have posted unbiased analysis of your photos and they both clearly agree that it's not real.

Stop saying nothing has been proven. Something has been proven; that your photo was altered to make it look like Bigfoot is there. End of story.

The experts have concluded it's not a Bigfoot. The amateurs have concluded it's not a Bigfoot. The public observers have all concluded it's not a Bigfoot. Every single attempt to recreate your "enhanced" version shows that your version contains information that was simply not present in the original. How do you account for this?

BTW, slander is something that is said (i.e. spoken). You're threatening the wrong charge. Additionally, it's only illegal if it's untrue. There isn't a court in the world that would believe nobody faked your picture. Additionally, who cares what accusations some people on a web forum threw at a guy posting a fake Bigfoot picture?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom