bigfoot is real I have the proof

[chillzero]

Yeah - I think I agree. I just wondered, because it does look something like that.

However, it is not a bigfoot.

 

[Alice Shortcake]

Please, after 1261 posts can we lay this thread to rest? All we've really learned is that it's possible, with a little help from Photoshop, to transform a few trees and shadows into what looks like a toy gorilla.

 

[LTC8K6]

In image #008, on the far right, you can again see the little tree that forks at the top and forms the shoulder of the see-through bigfoot.

 

[Creekfreak]

Thanks PC I look forward to your findings . As for all you others nice try you havent proved that this is a hoax in anyway as a matter of fact you have helped my case . Ive got to go to work keep trying you cannot and will not prove this is a hoax . The creatures are in the photo not very clear but they are there and with the proper enhanceing you will see them .

 

[darkwing]

I have also posted the enhanced copy (although I did have to resize it, the copy I was sent was over 5 megs in size and a Tif file) on that page for those who want to see the full rez copy that I was sent.

I will look at the Tif file Exif information and post that there too.

 

[DrewD]

There is nothing there. A little imagination and some photoshop enhancements, you get something that might look a little odd.

 

[AudioFreak]

Thanks PC I look forward to your findings . As for all you others nice try you havent proved that this is a hoax in anyway as a matter of fact you have helped my case . Ive got to go to work keep trying you cannot and will not prove this is a hoax . The creatures are in the photo not very clear but they are there and with the proper enhanceing you will see them .

Oh dear God... Do you mean they're there with the proper "drawing"? You claimed that boosting the blue would make the creature apparent and yet when that was done, viola! NOTHING! In fact it enhances the foliage in the background so we can know that if Bigfoot is there, he's see-through.

 

[Locknar]

Thanks PC I look forward to your findings . As for all you others nice try you havent proved that this is a hoax in anyway as a matter of fact you have helped my case . Ive got to go to work keep trying you cannot and will not prove this is a hoax . The creatures are in the photo not very clear but they are there and with the proper enhanceing you will see them .

Sadly, seems you've chosen the path of silliness.

ETA: In fact, if you read the posts and actually look at the snips from LTC, they do in fact prove it is a hoax. There are no creatures in the photo, other then the ones you imagine are there.

 

[Normal Dude]

Thanks PC I look forward to your findings . As for all you others nice try you havent proved that this is a hoax in anyway as a matter of fact you have helped my case . Ive got to go to work keep trying you cannot and will not prove this is a hoax . The creatures are in the photo not very clear but they are there and with the proper enhanceing you will see them .

And here we go again....

I think this has become a pride issue now.

I don't think now that Creekfreak was consiously scamming; if he was, he would have cut out of here a long time ago when he still had hope to sell it elsewhere. I think he got duped, and is now here out of pride.

 

[Biscuit]

CF look again. The 'lighting" that comes from the right that appears to give BF some head shape and definition are clearly just branches from the bush or tree that is to the far right of the image. This is a just a pic of a chopper.

Seriously, look at the original photo with that in mind and the BF just melts away.

 

[Tanstaafl]

Well, Creekfreak didn't find bigfoot, but he seems to have invented the zero-impedance logic sink. That's something, anyway.

 

[Z]

OK, I've tried negative image, polarizing, color shifting in every channel, and every other thing I can think of; NOTHING reveals a simian life form of any kind.

No contact with my friend in Florida, sadly... I think he's in the field.

 

[AudioFreak]

Well, Creekfreak didn't find bigfoot, but he seems to have invented the zero-impedance logic sink. That's something, anyway.

Now he just needs to find a ways to use this in an extortion scam and he'll be back on top.

 

[LTC8K6]

A crop of the full res "blue boosted only according to CF" version.

The original crop.

 

[AudioFreak]

Clearly there is no basis for the "eyes" in the original. They are fake. Plain as day.

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Aren't these pictures being posted in the wrong thread? Should they not be illustrating the "Invisible Bigfoot" thread?

 

[Tanstaafl]

Hey, I just realized, I have a lot of invisible bigfoot pictures. I could make a fortune!

 

[LTC8K6]

http://home.att.net/~ltc8k6/BW001.jpg

Black and white and brightened to death. Still nothing standing there.

I believe the basis for the eyes shows up, though.
It's just foliage, though.

That is more than enough of my time and storage...

I made a fair effort and found nothing except illusions and enhancements.

 

[Z]

If you enhance it just right, the blue 'eyes' do appear; but they also appear across all dark areas, nearly equally, like hundreds of blue eyes watching from the darkness - sometimes in singles, pairs, trios, etc.

To have just these two spots stand out would have taken selective enhancement - i.e. editing.

 

[mikeyx]

I'll have a go at 'em when I get home later today...but it may carry over into tomorrow, depending on time constraints this evening. There are several techniques I have in mind and as I originally proposed, I want to document my methodology, so it could take a little while. I'll try to post preliminaries, time allowing.

I have all photos and have jpegsnoop, I can at least run them through that and report findings...