bigfoot is real I have the proof

Big-foot-001a.jpg


001crop.jpg
 
LTC8K6 said:
I don't see anything in picture #7, nor do I see a picture of the same spot from the same angle.
Click to expand...

Image #7; take a look at the brush line and scroll all the way to the right.

....Ya' know... I think it might just be because my monitor at work sucks. I can't really see enough detail to determine if I can see brush in the darkness what CF alleges is BF's body there. I'd need to get home, zoom in and maybe do some enhancing of my own to verify. But I think you're actually right here. Same sort of situation with the Bigfoot in the middle of his dimensional shift in the first pic. lol

I was just thrown off by the apparent dark object (or lack of brush with shaded brush way back behind it) appearing to have a steady edge and extending to the ground. I'm gonna concede; at first I thought there was something but it seems much more likely it's just an illusion created by a branch with no growth on the right.
 
I upped the brightness and reduced the contrast, and I'm convinced that it's just a darker spot in the forest with some branches at bigfoot-eye-height.

001crop-adj.jpg
 
LTC8K6 said:
Just an opening it the trees with a dark background. We can clearly see how the tree branches made the outline of the see through bigfoot as well. No way anyone did not alter the photo with Darth Vader and his eyes in it, imo.
Click to expand...
I'd go along with that on all counts, though I thought it looked more like one of the solider apes from the original "Planet of the Apes" vs Darth :)
 
I'll have a go at 'em when I get home later today...but it may carry over into tomorrow, depending on time constraints this evening. There are several techniques I have in mind and as I originally proposed, I want to document my methodology, so it could take a little while. I'll try to post preliminaries, time allowing.
 
CASE CLOSED imho

LTC8K6's boost did the job for me. No Bigfoot. No grant money for CF.

See, Creek? Not proof, just an optical illusion and, I suspect, maybe a fast one being pulled on you by someone with photoshop.
 
It's amazing how that Bigfoot just jumps out at you when eyes, a hairline and other facial features are drawn on.
 
Creekfreak said:
why should I allow someone to run me down on a forum I cant post on come on get real . I still need to defend myself on this that would be like puting my head on the choping block . If I cant defend myself then its not worth posting it on a forum what do you not understand ?
Click to expand...
Creek - I've looked at your photos, I'm not sure what to say...other then no-dice; no "Bigfoot".

Yes, at very first glance there does appear to be a "Planet of the Apes" soldier looking thing there in the bottom corner. However, after a few seconds it is clear it is nothing more then a optical illusion; branches, dark spot in the woods, sun light, etc. If you zoom in, it is obvious.

What is missing from the picture, but painfully present in the low-res, is all the obvious photo editing that has been done.

I honestly don't think you did it...but someone did. They took your original, and did a very poor (and I mean VERY poor) editing job to make the illusion look more "real", and you bought it "hook, line and sinker" (as the saying goes). Why? Not because you are dumb or anything like that...but because you wanted to; you wanted to be "the one" that gets the pic. Hey, that is a very human reaction...and in all honesty, everyone wants to the "the one" that discovers/proves something nobody else has.

Now I know this is not what you want to hear, and I'm sure you won't take my word...or anyones word; more the pitty.

If you want to "clear your name"....it is ok to admit a mistake, to say "hey...I really did think something was there, but I guess I was wrong". I dare say, admiting when one is wrong can go a long way to reclaiming credit (as it were); nobody is right all the time.

However, trying to continue a fight after you've obviously lost just makes you look silly.

DING DING....the bell has rung, its a knock out. So the question is, which approach will you go with...the "hey, guess I was wrong" or continued sillyness. The choice is yours.
 
Last edited:
Locknar said:
If you want to "clear your name"....it is ok to admit a mistake, to say "hey...I really did think something was there, but I guess I was wrong". I dare say, admiting when one is wrong can go a long way to reclaiming credit (as it were); nobody is right all the time.
Click to expand...

I just want to add that admitting that there is no bigfoot in this picture doesn't invalidate any of the work you've done, or are continuing to do, in the field of Bigfoot spotting. Although I personally don't believe there is any credible evidence of Bigfoots, you have obviously had personal experiences that lead you to believe otherwise. The fact that this particular photo has no bigfoot in it doesn't lessen those other experiences, although it should make you wonder about whomever doctored it.
 
chillzero said:
Do you get termite mounds in Florida? Or ant hills?
Click to expand...

That thought entered my mind, however LTC8K6's boosted image clearly shows there is vegitation visible in the back. Unless it's a see-through termite mound, it really does appear to be nothing.
 
chillzero said:
Do you get termite mounds in Florida? Or ant hills?
Click to expand...

Now THAT would be one Galactic sized mound :)

Yeah yeah...I know, they have mounds like that other places...but not in FL. The termites/ants/fire ant mounds, while impressive compared to other areas, are no where near that large in height.

That aside, LTCs boosted image clearly show what AudioFreak mentions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom