bigfoot is real I have the proof

In order to improve the comprehensibility of Creekfreak's postings, I have rendered his latest missive into blank verse.

Creekfreak said:
I gave you the state
and section
of the state
what more do you want
geographically
?
my address
?
Your not geting
that sorry or the exact
location of
the photo was taken but I will
say it was close to where I live
.
And as far as my research goes
it was very exciting to
day I found some fresh tracks along the bank of the creek close
to the water line
.
The creek droped about
3 feet in the past 24
hours becouse of
the tides
.
So they are fresh tracks
.
some of them look like
barefoot human tracks but are wide for how long
they are
.
about a 81/2 in human size
but wide and some looked like
kuckle prints
.
The ends of the toes are round the big toe
is pronounced the others
are tight to the foot
.
No claw markes are
visable from the ends
of the toes
.
The sole is flat no arch
.
i did not have any plaster with me but it is
my thought
to waite tell tomarrow any way
to make a cast becouse the bank is wet
.
I want to give it
a chance to dry out
a little first
.
I set up my trail
cam with fresh batteries across the creek
from the tracks about 30
feet away from them
.
Tomarrow I will try and cast one
of them to see how it
turns out
.
If the conditions are right I will
cast the best ones
.
Ive been looking for a
track for a long time
I think this is it
.
See haveing a boat helps
I would have never seen
it if I was not in
the boat
.
happy hunting guys
I am one happy hunter
today 2 smoked deer shoulders that are tender and
juicey are waiting for me
.
I might even have a
beer and sit
in the yard like a
redneck bigfoot
!
Click to expand...
 
But what about the mysterious Third Bigfoot--the one standing on the Grassy Knoll?
 
My way of wrighting is better then yours . It takes up less space there fore less energy just doing my part for global warming . you may not thank me now but your grand kids will .
 
Last edited:
Creekfreak said:
My way wrighting is better then yours . It takes up less space there fore less energy just doing my part for global warming . you may not thank me now but your grand kids will .
Click to expand...

Even if that were true, what you have not taken into account is that it probably takes normal people up to five times longer to read and attempt to comprehend your meandering writing as it does to do the same with normal posts.

There have been over 9,500 views of this thread, so every person viewing, taking all that extra time to try and understand what you are saying, would do far more damage to the environment (assuming what you say is correct, purely for the sake of the discussion) than you could possibly save.

Norm
 
Creekfreak said:
My way wrighting is better then yours . It takes up less space there fore less energy just doing my part for global warming . you may not thank me now but your grand kids will .
Click to expand...

Oh yeah? Well my posts are made of 100% recycled electrons.

;)
 
Creekfreak said:
My way of wrighting is better then yours . It takes up less space there fore less energy just doing my part for global warming . you may not thank me now but your grand kids will .
Click to expand...

So does this mean you won't narrow the geographic region down, say name a town/city near you? You won't provide the name of the pic editor, or the name of the paper they work for? You won't provide any help in trying to identify the fire you talk about?

ETA - What is that link suppose to do for me? It is 7 pages of nothing from what I can tell...other then you talking about a new scope, or wanting to have a beer with Bigfoot. Of course, you already knew this.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah? Well my posts are made of 100% recycled electrons. cool whats the name of the program your useing ?
 
Creekfreak said:
Oh yeah? Well my posts are made of 100% recycled electrons. cool whats the name of the program your useing ?
Click to expand...


.... it was a joke to highlight the absurdity of your attempting to save the environment by writing crappy posts.
 
Look, that's the worst bigfoot pic I've ever seen. You could at least make a bit of effort.
 
hmmm... said:
Look, that's the worst bigfoot pic I've ever seen. You could at least make a bit of effort.
Click to expand...

Oh come now. This picture is much worse :D

worst_bigfoot_ever-59f.jpg
 
AudioFreak said:
Okay... that's a few thousand square miles. Care to give a city? Ca. 25 mi SE of (insert city name) at approximately 4PM local time, etc... I mean, if there was a fire and helicopters were sent, there should be record, right? The date on the image looks fake but assuming it's true, it should be easy enough for you to get that info.
Click to expand...

FWIW much of Florida was experiencing drought conditions and brush fires were common across the state in April. Most news reports I've found were from Central Florida, but at least one report was from the panhandle ("bugaboo" fire - largest in Florida history). Florida is so wildfire prone that the Florida Wildlife Commission is considered the best trained wildfire fighting force in the world.

So, the April 16 date, with brown grass in the picture and talk of wildfire fits the general evidence.
 
Apology said:
Oh come now. This picture is much worse :D

[qimg]http://e.photos.cx/worst_bigfoot_ever-59f.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Don't be so hard on yourself. I took the liberty of outlining the bigfoot's face:


See, he even has a sagittal crest.
 
That Picture was made for me by talented artest named paul this is true and given to me as a gift . That is my creek that he superimposed it in . As far as alterations we where going to work together to see if we could come closer to what I saw this is close but not exactly like what I saw . The hair on the one I saw was a tangled mess with leaves and twigs in it and much longer . In the photo I took the bigfoot is not visible enough to confirm it is the same one . I personaly dont think it is becouse I feel this one is a female becouse of the young one with her . the one I saw face to face was a big male and yes you can tell if it is a male when you have been as close as I have been to one .

lock that last quote you made of mine ment that my way of wrighting is better then yours and I am doing my part for global warming . the link is my research page read and you will see most of the answers to the questions you have asked me .
 
If there are 3 bigfoots in the photo I am Thankfull to God for protecting them from the fire . mama with her babys thats a good sign they are haveing more then one young so there population is on the rise . Its heart warming to see
 
Nobody wants to read 7 pages of your ramblings. Putting up with this thread is ridiculous enough. We've asked for simple facts. Why not make one post containing them instead of 100 posts giving excuses and bombarding us with your butchery of the English language?

And yes, my great grandkids I'm sure will look up at the pure blue sky and yell "Thank you Creekfreak! Thank you for all your posts online that somehow helped save the planet! Way to go you cooky old bouncer, you. Now us and Bigfoot live together happily and it's all thanks to your mindless postings on the JREF! Huzzah!" :rolleyes:
 
Considering that instead of making a post which precisely list all detail requested, like the nearest city and the full name of the editor to double check the story, you muddy the things and make useless post without informational content, spending more electrical power (making his useless post, and people reading them), my grand kid will spit on your name rather than praise you.

I mean what is so hard in giving a name and a location ? That's not as if we were asking your true name and your exact post address. How about something along the line of "photo was taken in a radius of 20 miles of wellington (fl), and the guy editing the photo is named Paul Doe and works for the wellington sentinel"...
 
Aepervius I see you are a mod on a bigfoot discussion forum . Do you allways make it a habbit of takeing peoples photos without there permission then posting them on your site ? As far as kids spiting on my name what do you think they will do to yours for haveing a reputation of being a photo theif ?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom