bigfoot is real I have the proof

[Normal Dude]

lock I have offered to send an unenhanced copy to the mabrc and I will . I am not trying to hoax any of you people that is not in my nature I take pride in my honesty . That is something very rare these days . There is nothing being held back just a lack of proof by you before you said out right this is a fake .

I don't believe you. Nothing you have done here has indicated to me that I should trust you. The fact that you can profess your honesty while withholding the evidence at the same time screams nothing but scam.

You have not proven anything so you are worng and I am right its that simple .

Oh man. That piece of debate brilliance has stunned me.

Yes it will take an expert to prove this I say it is real and you say it isent your word is no better then mine without an expert confirming it .So I guess you will never know if your right or worng untell you take the effort to prove it .

We don't have to prove crap. It's all on your shoulders. And contrary to what your ego might think, none of us really give a flying crap about this thread and this photo. It is just providing some mild entertainment.

I know I am right but your going to have to go through life not being sure if your a fool or not .

Oh noes!!!1

 

[AudioFreak]

There is nothing being held back just a lack of proof by you before you said out right this is a fake .

Uhm, if there's nothing being held back then why aren't you posting the high-res unenhanced image? You said you had proof. So show us the real proof then! Not some low-res JPG that appears to be doctored.

You claim that we're fools for saying it's a fake without an expert to confirm it's fake. I'd counter you're a fool for saying it's real without an expert to confirm it's real.

 

[AudioFreak]

Oh noes!!!1

You mean you're not worried if "your a fool or not"? I think the inability to grasp 8th grade grammar by the time you're middle-aged is a pretty good sign that one is, in fact, a fool.

 

[madurobob]

Hmm. Zooming in reveals at least five (actually more) rectangles...

I see those odd rectangles and vertical/horizontal lines throughout the picture so they may simply be a result of the low resolution. They do show up in greater number and more obviously in and around the "bigfoot". what bugs me is that the "bigfoot" just looks too crisp and too flat for the fuzziness and depth of the rest of the picture. The creature just pops off the page. This pic is useless without the original.

Whats even more surprising to me is this big ugly critter is standing there right n front of the chopper, but the pilot is not looking at it and not all all alarmed. S/he is looking down and to the left.

 

[Locknar]

lock I have offered to send an unenhanced copy to the mabrc and I will . I am not trying to hoax any of you people that is not in my nature I take pride in my honesty . That is something very rare these days . There is nothing being held back just a lack of proof by you before you said out right this is a fake . You have not proven anything so you are worng and I am right its that simple . Yes it will take an expert to prove this I say it is real and you say it isent your word is no better then mine without an expert confirming it .So I guess you will never know if your right or worng untell you take the effort to prove it . I know I am right but your going to have to go through life not being sure if your a fool or not . Welcome to the jungle

I have to say, your conduct seems to scream "scam" more then honest researcher. Not a acquisition, just an observation.

Not only did you never answer my questions (when was the pic taken, where was it taken, etc.) you've avoided similar questions from the MABRC folks as well. Avoiding answering even the most basic of questions is not the hallmark of honesty.

I'd be happy to cut and post various artifacts from the low-res photo, ie. no left shoulder, obvious cut/paste blocks, branches hanging from nowhere, wrong edging around "Bigfoot", etc. but the pic being copyrighted I can't (convenient for you I must say).

I'm not sure what to make of the "...go through life not being sure if your a fool or not" comment; in that I do not think a honest, real researcher would have to resort to insults or taunts. But hey, if it makes you feel better knock yourself out.

Always seems to be the way of the "wooer"; make claims, no evidence/questionable (obviously fake) evidence, then throw taunts/insults at people...all while claiming to be honest.

ETA - As you have no established control protocol's, any "research" and evidence you collect (such as your pic) have exactly ZERO scientific value. I'd suggest you find a book on scientific research methods, establish protocols, and then follow them. Until then, your research is 100%, totally meaningless.

 

[D'rok]

Whats even more surprising to me is this big ugly critter is standing there right n front of the chopper, but the pilot is not looking at it and not all all alarmed. S/he is looking down and to the left.

OK...I feel a little silly asking this, but....I've stared and stared and stared at this picture and I can't see a bigfoot anywhere, fake or otherwise. What am I missing?

 

[madurobob]

OK...I feel a little silly asking this, but....I've stared and stared and stared at this picture and I can't see a bigfoot anywhere, fake or otherwise. What am I missing?

The strange dark object on the extreme right, at the midpoint in the height of the photo.

Scary glowing eyes!

 

[Skeptical Greg]

I see at least a dozen more Bigfeets back in the woods..

The place is crawling with them ..

I find it interesting that the two Bigfeets in the foreground don't seem at all interested in, or distracted by the chopper ..

Maybe the chopper doesn't exist in their visual dimension ..

 

[Michelle]

I think the biggest problem here is that the bigfoot looks like a toy I had as a kid. Or a dude in a cheap gorilla costume. ...Or perhaps even a fake (On purpose fake that is) illustration of Big Foot from the web or a book that you copy-pasted in. And that it looks totally out of place, does not fit with the lighting of the scene... Wow. Bad fake.

The JPG quality's so low that it seems to be an attempt to hide up all your cheap goofs... Offer us a higher res with MUCH less compression. As a person that works with Photoshop and other computer graphic programs all day I'm calling phony on this picture.


...and why are all the big foots online looking different? Sheesh!

 

[Normal Dude]

I think the biggest problem here is that the bigfoot looks like a toy I had as a kid.

EXACTLY.

Thank you.

The over-accentuated features give it away.

 

[Creekfreak]

you people are the ones that started with the insults not me so who is the real researcher here . lock I have answered every question that has been asked by the mabrc . I have not withheld anything they just have not received all my imformation and that is an original unenhanced copy . becouse of what happened there I have not been in contact with them untell Dark showed up here . It may take some time to get all this together so dont get in a hurry .I can only do so much I am still doing research in case you have forgot and I need to get back to it . I cant be siting here when I can be in the field trying to get better photos that is more entertaining to me then entertaining you .

 

[Locknar]

you people are the ones that started with the insults not me so who is the real researcher here . lock I have answered every question that has been asked by the mabrc . I have not withheld anything they just have not received all my imformation and that is an original unenhanced copy . becouse of what happened there I have not been in contact with them untell Dark showed up here . It may take some time to get all this together so dont get in a hurry .I can only do so much I am still doing research in case you have forgot and I need to get back to it . I cant be siting here when I can be in the field trying to get better photos that is more entertaining to me then entertaining you .

"Real" researchers establish control protocols and then follow them; something you've not done (or if you have, you've not been able to articulate that point).

As to providing information....you still have yet to answer my two questions as to when was this picture taken (which has since been answered as the date is stamped on the photo) and WHERE was the pic taken, as in geographically where.

Darkwing would have to address MABRC issues...but from their website they claim they've asked you for witness information, an accounting for any enhacements your witness made, chain of custody, comparison shot of the same location, etc. None of which you've provided (according to Darkwing).

What can I say...your claims are not supported by the facts.

 

[Normal Dude]

you people are the ones that started with the insults not me so who is the real researcher here .

Ouch. Just out of curiosity, what is your definition of research, and what does it entail? (Don't look it up, I will know)

I have not withheld anything they just have not received all my information and that is an original unenhanced copy .

Spoken like a true politician.

It is not the original, un-enhanced copy. It has almost certainly been compressed from a .bmp file into a smaller .jpeg file. This significantly decreases image quality.

I can only do so much I am still doing research in case you have forgot and I need to get back to it . I cant be siting here when I can be in the field trying to get better photos that is more entertaining to me then entertaining you .

Yep, because it takes so long to upload a picture file or send it to someone. About as long as your original extortion post, in fact.

It is now posted here for the public to view, and come to their own conclusions. In no way, does MABRC endorse this picture or it's authenticity, because in all honesty, we have not been able to authenticate it because of the lack of information coming from Creek on the above list of requested information.

 

[D'rok]

The strange dark object on the extreme right, at the midpoint in the height of the photo.

Scary glowing eyes!

I'm full of fail today. I still can't see it. Rorschach is my nemesis, I guess.

 

[Aepervius]

I see those odd rectangles and vertical/horizontal lines throughout the picture so they may simply be a result of the low resolution. They do show up in greater number and more obviously in and around the "bigfoot". what bugs me is that the "bigfoot" just looks too crisp and too flat for the fuzziness and depth of the rest of the picture. The creature just pops off the page. This pic is useless without the original.

Whats even more surprising to me is this big ugly critter is standing there right n front of the chopper, but the pilot is not looking at it and not all all alarmed. S/he is looking down and to the left.

That is what I meant above. Without a high resolution pic it is impossible to say, maybe like a raw, but I get the feeling of a high res pic pasted over another pic of lower res. Which is why it appear so crisp in comparison to foreground.

Frankly creekfreak, look at the various hoax , like the helico shark image... It is too easy to fake picture. Heck it starts to be easy for a normal persons to hoax films...

The only way we can believe you, THE ONLY one, is to provide the unchanged raw image (*). If you don't want to, then don't bother.

(*) ETA : hell I am sure photoshop now can even make raw with exif tag which looks like they were never touched, or somebody dedicated could fake them reasonably enough, if they know the spec of the file generated by the camera... Still better than a jpg, as you can apply various technic to check the image..

 

[Apology]

I'm going to be charitable here, Creekfreak, and say that your friend that enhanced the photo played a little trick on you, and you've been taken for a ride. That's more than the others here are willing to do; they're just calling you a flat-out fraud.

 

[Locknar]

I'm going to be charitable here, Creekfreak, and say that your friend that enhanced the photo played a little trick on you, and you've been taken for a ride. That's more than the others here are willing to do; they're just calling you a flat-out fraud.

As he can't not account for the custody chain , that is certianly a possibility.

 

[Apology]

As he can't not account for the custody chain , that is certianly a possibility.

I've been told that I err on the side of caution frequently

 

[Biscuit]

Ok I can see what is claimed to be a big foot at the far left with the beady little eyes. Where in the name of all things big footian is this second bigfoot?

And on another note is it "Bigfoot" or "Big Foot" or "Big-Foot"?
Are there specific grammer or punctuation rules for figments of ones imagination?

 

[Skeptical Greg]

Ok I can see what is claimed to be a big foot at the far left with the beady little eyes. Where in the name of all things big footian is this second bigfoot?

Here is a zoom and screen capture.. I will have to leave it up to you to locate this crop within the image.. ( far right - about middle vertically )

We have #1, #2 and what is obviously a teddy bear ( #3 ) being held by #2 ..

I can't imagine how this violates fair use, but the mods may want to take the side of caution and convert this to a link...