bigfoot is real I have the proof

[William Parcher]

Ok I can see what is claimed to be a big foot at the far left with the beady little eyes.

Those eyes are blue, according to Freak...

Yes LT its all very strange but it makes sence if you see the photo . The bigfoots where more or less connered at the time they could not come across the marsh to whare we where and they could not go back across the creek the fire was on that side . I think the pilots where hovering to hold them back from comeing across the marsh to the houses that where behind me . Lots of old folks liveing in the houses that would not have been a good thing . There was a line of trees in the marsh area that ran down the middle the choper was on the other side of those trees we call them scrub oaks there not big . There are only 2 letters showing on the tail section the rest is covered by the trees . I am going asume its a female becouse of the young one with her that is bent over right in front of her . You can see its eyes it is looking at me and not the choper . But she is looking at the choper standing there just as pretty as can be blue eyes in case your wondering .she looks to be over 10 feet tall I wont know for sure untell I measure the tree she was standing beside I will need the boat for that .

The above narration paints a picture of what was going on when the photo was taken. LOL

 

[Michelle]

I'm sorry creek, but real researchers studied for years and know how to type english properly since they have written tons of reports and research papers.

By your words, you're just a guy with a camera that might have had a fluke at seein some creature in the corner of a picture (Never full centered uh?). By my words, you're just a guy with a camera that snapped a woodland picture where a helicopter was and added a guy in a costume. By unproven presumptions, you might just be a guy WITHOUT a camera that found a picture of an helicopter in woodlands on the net and the picture of a dude in a gorilla costume and decided to combine them together cheaply by the powers of some graphic editing program just to get a 14 pages thread on some board.

 

[William Parcher]

Dave, I've got a Bigfoot mother and baby at 3 o'clock. I'm gonna go down and take a look.

10-4, Steve. This is getting far too common. We need to control these animals, and should call in other agencies to do it.

Looks like she's trying to teach the young one how to cross the swamp and get right up to those homes.

Yep. Gonna turn some trash cans in broad daylight. The sight of one of those apes might cause a sudden cardiac arrest of one of our seniors. Those are taxpayers.

I'm taking her down and will hover tight and give them a faceful of prop wash. She won't be teaching trailer park activities to Junior today.

Roger that, Steve.

 

[RayG]

Ok I can see what is claimed to be a big foot at the far left with the beady little eyes. Where in the name of all things big footian is this second bigfoot?

OMG!! Do you not see them? There are at least SIX bigfoot in that picture. Don't make me get out the red circles.

And on another note is it "Bigfoot" or "Big Foot" or "Big-Foot"?

Bigfoot is how it's usually written by those in bigfootdom.

Are there specific grammer or punctuation rules for figments of ones imagination?

Yes, one writes Unicorn not Uni Corn or Uni-Corn, and Werewolf not Were Wolf or Were-Wolf.

RayG

 

[Apology]

We have #1, #2 and what is obviously a teddy bear ( #3 ) being held by #2 ..

Gosh I didn't even see the "Bigfoot Baby". There's supposed to be another full-sized Bigfoot standing in profile to the left of the Bigfoot holding the baby. It looks awfully like a rock so don't feel bad if you didn't spot it

Now there's three bigfeets in the picture, but Creekfreak said there was only two (?)

 

[Skeptical Greg]

...
Yes, one writes Unicorn not Uni Corn or Uni-Corn, and Werewolf not Were Wolf or Were-Wolf.

RayG

Is Unicorn plural also , or do you write ' Unicorns ' ?

 

[Locknar]

For what is matters....Creek told the MABRC folks, as well as stated in this thread (I think) that the enhancements were done by the woman that was with him when he took the picture.

We made some requests from Creek, we wanted the camera type used, other witness information, contact information for the woman that did the enhancements, what enhancements she did and the chain of custody.

From today....

The man that did the enhanceing is the art editer for the local news paper . And is also a sindicated poilitical cartoonest . He takes great pride in is his work and would never do anything to ruin his credibility .

So apparently who ever made the changes has had a sex change? What paper? Where (as in geographic location) was "your" picture taken? What time of day?

 

[Normal Dude]

Sounds like someone can't keep his lies straight...

 

[Michelle]

Haven't you realized yet that he's making up so many things even he is losing track of 'em?

 

[Normal Dude]

Haven't you realized yet that he's making up so many things even he is losing track of 'em?

Yep. That's usually when they stumble.

 

[Creekfreak]

I told Dark it was a man that did the enhanceing he made the mistake of saying it was a women not me get your facts straight . I women brought it to my attention but she had nothing to do with enhanceing it . lock if you want to build trust with someone that is not the way to do it you can forget about ever seeing what I have on your site nice try .why dont you post the rest of what I sent you before you tryed to twist my words.

 

[Normal Dude]

I told Dark it was a man that did the enhanceing he made the mistake of saying it was a women not me get your facts straight . I women brought it to my attention but she had nothing to do with enhanceing it .

Fair enough.

lock if you want to build trust with someone that is not the way to do it you can forget about ever seeing what I have on your site nice try .

... Says the man who wanted people to pay for a photograph that they could not see before hand.

 

[Creekfreak]

Where (as in geographic location) was "your" picture taken? What time of day?
How many times do I have to say this to you I am in fla north west to be exact The panhandle . Are you dence or do you not comprehend very well ?

 

[Normal Dude]

Where (as in geographic location) was "your" picture taken? What time of day?
How many times do I have to say this to you I am in fla north west to be exact The panhandle . Are you dence or do you not comprehend very well ?

Actually your atrocious writing style makes it difficult to understand half of your posts.

 

[Michelle]

Come on creek, don't start on comprehension. You're the comprehension problem here. Sometimes I have to try to read out loud your sentences to understand them. And THAT does not always work.
So when is the hi res uncompressed image coming?

 

[Locknar]

I told Dark it was a man that did the enhanceing he made the mistake of saying it was a women not me get your facts straight . I women brought it to my attention but she had nothing to do with enhanceing it . lock if you want to build trust with someone that is not the way to do it you can forget about ever seeing what I have on your site nice try .why dont you post the rest of what I sent you before you tryed to twist my words.

The man/woman issue is really for you and Darkwing to resolve; I am simply pointing out the inconsistency.

Darkwing, Creek says you got it wrong....the woman that was the witness was not the one that did the enhancing. Can you please clarify?

Below is the full text of the PM (including spelling errors) as you requested:

The man that did the enhanceing is the art editer for the local news paper . And is also a sindicated poilitical cartoonest . He takes great pride in is his work and would never do anything to ruin his credibility .The creature can be seen in the original nothing was added just the colors where brightened . The history of his work is incoded on the photo file itself so every one could see what he did . all you need is photo shop to find the history any one can do it . I am not hiding any thing here bro its all right in front of everyones face they just dont know to see it . Brb company

NOTE: BOLD mine.

It is worth noting, you claim you have nothing to hide....yet STILL have not answered questions such as where (geographically) was your photo taken? What time of day? The various issues that Darkwing claims you've not answered.... Who is this cartoonist? What paper?

I've said before, until you establish some sort of control protocol, and then follow it, anything you find through your "research" is totally, 100% meaningless. At this point, that would include your original photo.

Specific to the low-res photo, there is ample artifact evidence of photoshoping/editing; wrong lighting, branches appearing out of no place, obvious cut/paste blocks, wrong edging along "Bigfoots", and the other things folks here have pointed out.

 

[Creekfreak]

I gave you the state and section of the state what more do you want geographically ? my address ? Your not geting that sorry or the exact location of the photo was taken but I will say it was close to where I live . And as far as my research goes it was very exciting to day I found some fresh tracks along the bank of the creek close to the water line . The creek droped about 3 feet in the past 24 hours becouse of the tides . So they are fresh tracks . some of them look like barefoot human tracks but are wide for how long they are . about a 81/2 in human size but wide and some looked like kuckle prints . The ends of the toes are round the big toe is pronounced the others are tight to the foot . No claw markes are visable from the ends of the toes . The sole is flat no arch . i did not have any plaster with me but it is my thought to waite tell tomarrow any way to make a cast becouse the bank is wet . I want to give it a chance to dry out a little first .I set up my trail cam with fresh batteries across the creek from the tracks about 30 feet away from them . Tomarrow I will try and cast one of them to see how it turns out . If the conditions are right I will cast the best ones . Ive been looking for a track for a long time I think this is it . See haveing a boat helps I would have never seen it if I was not in the boat . happy hunting guys I am one happy hunter today 2 smoked deer shoulders that are tender and juicey are waiting for me . I might even have a beer and sit in the yard like a redneck bigfoot !

 

[Locknar]

I gave you the state and section of the state what more do you want geographically ? my address ?

No, I've asked several times...what is the nearest town, major city? The (now) man you claim edited your pic, what local paper does he work for?

Certianly this is pretty basic information you can provide, as you have nothing to hide right?

 

[AudioFreak]

Where (as in geographic location) was "your" picture taken? What time of day?
How many times do I have to say this to you I am in fla north west to be exact The panhandle . Are you dence or do you not comprehend very well ?

Okay... that's a few thousand square miles. Care to give a city? Ca. 25 mi SE of (insert city name) at approximately 4PM local time, etc... I mean, if there was a fire and helicopters were sent, there should be record, right? The date on the image looks fake but assuming it's true, it should be easy enough for you to get that info. Right? For someone who is a "researcher" it should have been documented in the first place. So what gives? How come you find it sufficient to say "the panhandle" and leave it at that?

Do you honestly think if there was a missing child that someone could report that they saw the child on Long Island and leave it at that? What kind of bumbling fool wouldn't have any more details? Unless they're a liar.

 

[Locknar]

Okay... that's a few thousand square miles. Care to give a city? Ca. 25 mi SE of (insert city name) at approximately 4PM local time, etc... I mean, if there was a fire and helicopters were sent, there should be record, right? The date on the image looks fake but assuming it's true, it should be easy enough for you to get that info. Right? For someone who is a "researcher" it should have been documented in the first place. So what gives? How come you find it sufficient to say "the panhandle" and leave it at that?

Well...I've looked the past couple of days, and can not find any reference to any significant forest fires in the panhandle of FL in APR '07. I'm not saying there was not any...just that given the fairly large region "panhandle" covers/implies I can not find any reference.

Can you help out Creek? You claim you have nothing to hide....can you narrow down the geographic region, provide a reference that talks about the forest fire in APR 07?

You want to establish your credibility, here is your chance.