lets see if I can clear up a few things for you guys .
1. There was a fire and everyone that lives in this areas knew about it . there where many witnesses to the fire I dont know if it was in the paper or on the news I dont get the paper and I dont watch very much tv so I couldent tell you that . But normaly if choppers are envolved then it makes it to the news this is a small town kind of place .
Well as a real researcher, you can understand the importance of documentation. Plainly started, if it is not documented it didn't happen; what can I say. At this point I'd have to conclude this fire on April 16, 2007 did not happen.
If you can find something to support this claim, obviously this conclusion would be in error.
2 as far as finding burned out areas your right google earth does not show recent pics of an area unless you pay for them .
As I noted, this is not conclusive "proof" of no fire...simply a statement of fact that the 2007 image set from the USGS does not show any "major fires" having occured in the area around "Dead Lake".
If you can find something to support your claim, that would be outstanding.
Just to clarify, what picture are you talking about in the above? Is it the same helicopter we've been discussing or is is a different one.
Lock I dont understand this question . The picture I was refering to was the one someone posted with a picture of a artests conception of a bigfoot in my creek .It has nothing to do with the fire or the photo I took of the real bigfoot .
You might not have understood the question, but awfully good guess as that was exactly what what I was asking. Thanks for clearing that up.
3.I am not sure but the date on the pic could be worng this cam has stamped the worng date before .
You've stated before, in this thread, that the date stamped on the pic was when it was taken. Are you changing your claim?
That is fine if you are...though that leaves this as nothing more then a undocumented, undated photograph at this point making any verficiation impossible.
5 the mabrc found no matches becouse the numbers are not showing on the huey . I havent had a chance to look at the other photos of the cobra to see if its numbers are showing on it . If you would like to contact the fla forestry dept go right ahead ask them about the wettapo creek fire of this year . I would be intrested to hear what they say about it also .
I can find no reference as to any fire occuring in the Wetapo Creek area; that is not to say there was not such fire.
If you can find something to support your claim, that would be outstanding.
6 Ok brainyacs nown we come to the aleged adding to the photo with photoshop . This is not ture nothing was added to this photo . The proof in right in front of your eyes but you just dont know how to see it . yes photo shoped was used but only to brighten the colors . The history of the photo is incoded in the photos file all you have to do is use photo shop to open it . I can even do it so I guess that makes me smarter then all of you . the person that did the work left the history of his work on the photo becouse he knew I would be faced with douts from people like you . Go ahead open it if you have the guts to be proven worng . All you have to do is reverse what he did and there you have it the original photo right in front of your eyes . big blue eyes btw is what wewahichicka means maybe those indains knew about the bigfoot and there blue eyes when they named that town .
Editing history can be eaisly removed, thus without the original pic to compare to this would be pointless.
I was acutually going to refer to it as "Blue Eyes", but wanted to avoide the whole "Planet of the Apes" tie in...let alone any potential insult to Charleton Heston.
). 
