bigfoot is real I have the proof

[drapier]

Link: http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4425&sid=60a3243db0e1546f5fc6ce5af0bf98d0

Unless Bigfoot is the critter wearing the yellow jacket and flying the helicopter, I'm not seeing it.

Look at the extreme right edge of the picture. Bigfoot and his doppelganger (the ghostlike image to the left of the Bigfoot proper) are watching the helicopter.

 

[Apology]

Link: http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4425&sid=60a3243db0e1546f5fc6ce5af0bf98d0

Unless Bigfoot is the critter wearing the yellow jacket and flying the helicopter, I'm not seeing it.

It's on the far right of the photo, took me a while too since it doesn't look much like Bigfoot to me. Looks more like an ape suit or just an optical illusion. Possibly a really bad photoshop.

 

[Correa Neto]

P-A-R-E-I-D-O-L-I-A

All together now!

PAREIDOLIA!

Well, if this is what you call "too good to be true"...

Much ado about nothing.

ETA1:
That's not a Huey.
Follow the linkies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UH-1_Iroquois
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_205
and see what's a Huey.
ETA2:
My bigfoot photo is better.

Now you all own me U$10,00.00
-The above is a really bad Photoshopping.

 

[Apology]

Now that I've been looking at it for a while, "Doppelganger Bigfoot", the one on the left, looks like a rock, which makes the one on the right look less like an ape suit and more like a rock too. Took me forever to even see "Doppelganger Bigfoot" because I kept "mistaking" him for a rock, in fact.

Who else thinks it's a couple of large rocks?

 

[Normal Dude]

It looks like one of those big doll toys of an ape....

 

[Locknar]

I took a quick look; its just a photoshop...and a poor one at that. If you zoom in, the "edging" on Bigfoot is all wrong. Also, if you follow the right shoulder down, you see it makes a totally straight line going down into the trees/brush.

Darkwing - Thanks for posting it...but I'd suggest your experts need some help. Even if you want to disagree with the "edging" being wrong, the totally straight right shoulder is total give away.

Creek - Funny you could not remember the date, when IT IS STAMPED ON THE PICTURE. Anyway, very poor attempt dude....I know, you really took the pic, it't not a fake, you didn't photoshop, blah blah blah. It is obvious you did.

 

[Normal Dude]

I took a quick look; its just a photoshop...and a poor one at that. If you zoom in, the "edging" on Bigfoot is all wrong. Also, if you follow the right shoulder down, you see it makes a totally straight line going down into the trees/brush.

This was my first impression as well. I believe the object has been photoshopped in, but I can't say with 100% certainty that the right side of the object (left as you view it) is all that unusual simply because of the data loss that results in the image being converted to JPEG. A look at a higher resolution would clear the issue.

It really likes an artist's impression of an ape, or something you would see for sale as a costume / toy....

 

[Z]

Not very clear what it is. Having lived in Florida for most of my adolescent life, though, it reminds me a LOT of old cypress stumps or burnt mangrove trunks, though not usually quite that tall. My off-the-cuff guess is it's either rocks or old tree trunks, carefully altered pixel-by-pixel via paint or photoshop or PSpro or another app.

A few things that stand out to my (untrained) eye - three lumps suggesting heads, one with dots suggesting a reflection on eyes - but a strong light artifact on the primarily visible creature's left shoulder suggests strong sunlight to his/her left, which wouldn't cause the eyes to reflect as they seem to. My guess - film artifact or manipulation. Second - the black of the three lumps seems unnaturally dark compared to the rest of the scene (though the left lump, not so much so). Third - the rightmost lump, upon close examination, has an almost gorilla-like face - except that it appears to be missing the top of its head entirely. Unless lump 3 is supposed to be a ridgeline on lump 2's head, perhaps...

The perspective also looks a bit misleading - the helicopter on the left could quite possibly be further away than the lumps on the right, meaning those lumps could be smaller and more likely rocks or old stumps. The foreground obscures the base of the brushline so badly, it's hard to say where the brush actually is for either side of the picture.

As photos go, I'd say it's probably worth, oh, the price of a post card.

 

[drapier]

The bigfoot in Creakfreak's picture reminded me of the Ohio bigfoot that Cryptomundo posted some pictures of : http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/ourbigfoot/

Maybe they're cousins.

 

[Locknar]

This was my first impression as well. I believe the object has been photoshopped in, but I can't say with 100% certainty that the right side of the object (left as you view it) is all that unusual simply because of the data loss that results in the image being converted to JPEG. A look at a higher resolution would clear the issue.

Perhaps...but I don't see that effect anyplace else in the image. Also...depending on how much you zoom in, to the left of the "eyes"...it looks like a cut and paste of background material. Not only is there a branch "in mid air", you can see the entire blocks "edges".

To me it looks like someone did a cut and paste, and then tried to edit around the Bigfoot image, pasting background, and trying to blend the edges.

ETA - I also agree with Z, the lighting is wrong....the appearance of strong light to the "creatures" left does not match-up with the reflective eyes.

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Bigfoot never wants to go kayaking, or bike riding, or sky diving?

Bigfoot never just stands around goofing off, or kicking a can around, or skipping rocks on a pond?

Bigfoot never sits on a log for a few hours to watch the sunrise or the moon or contemplate his navel or anything?

Mr. Bigfoot never takes Mrs bigfoot to the secluded spot with the great view for a little something something?

Mrs bigfoot's purse isn't full of photographs of her family?

Mr bigfoot doesn't want some shoes for his sore feet after 135 million years of stepping on sharp rocks every once in a while?

Mr bigfoot doesn't want TOILET PAPER?

 

[Normal Dude]

Perhaps...but I don't see that effect anyplace else in the image. Also...depending on how much you zoom in, to the left of the "eyes"...it looks like a cut and paste of background material. Not only is there a branch "in mid air", you can see the entire blocks "edges".

To me it looks like someone did a cut and paste, and then tried to edit around the Bigfoot image, pasting background, and trying to blend the edges.

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you, just voicing other possibilities.

Nice try, creekfreak. Now I can see why you did not want to show and tell.

 

[madurobob]

Why is it that bigfoot (and ghosts, and spirits, and...) are so often on the edge of the picture? If you see bigfoot and raise your camera to snap a shot, aren't you going to line it up in the center of the frame? This bigfoot (stump) doesn't appear to be moving, so its not like keeping him in frame would be difficult.

This looks like yet another "hey look what I found on that photo I took last month!". Kinda hard to believe it was taken as described in creek's narrative.

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Darth Vader? And the Big Helmet guy from Spaceballs?

 

[darkwing]

Darkwing - Thanks for posting it...but I'd suggest your experts need some help. Even if you want to disagree with the "edging" being wrong, the totally straight right shoulder is total give away.

They did pretty good actually, they pointed out a lot of stuff you guys missed.

 

[Starthinker]

Looks more like Mothman to me.

 

[Locknar]

They did pretty good actually, they pointed out a lot of stuff you guys missed.

Do tell, what did they point out?

 

[kitakaze]

It's a hoax. It's a dumb hoax. Not a stump, not a rock, not 'woops, it looked like a bigfoot'.

It's a hoax that I'm thinking was done by the female friend that freak speaks of. As Lock said, it's photoshopped. Badly.

This is why freak was and is making excuses to not provide the original unaltered image.

freak is scamming. Badly.

 

[kitakaze]

darkwing,

Despite what some have posted here, the MABRC does not believe everything tossed our way about Bigfoot, we do research all evidence brought to us.

'Too good to be true' is probably a better choice of words

Even Pastor Anderholm can see that's not a better choice of words.

No, we believe a large primate lives across the North American Continent. To classify it as an ape would be presumptuous until it's actually brought in and verified by science.

Yes, primate. See, darkwing, that's when bigfootery jumped the shark. If you guys wanna play Woods n' Wildmen and tell us there are elusive, giant, bipedal primates escaping classification all over the continent, then I would recommend the Burgstahler angle. It's actually the lesser of two ridiculous fantasies, IMO.

Partly true, that was one of the reasons he was asked to resign.

Oh, "...asked to resign." You left that part out before.

 

[Normal Dude]

With the picture in mind, I now implore everyone to go back and read the first page. Everything makes so much more sense now.