Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is why Roger Patterson had to bring in specially trained "BIGFOOT DOGS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA", and didn't want the local bloodhounds to even bother tracking the beast. As a Bigfoot Expert, he knew the folly of sending simple police dogs after such a brute.
 
Ahhhh... Another interesting gimmick. I don't know anything about tracking dogs, but every dog I had my whole life was useful in picking up a game scent. So if a game bird had crossed the trail or a bunny or somehting, the dog would veer off and you might get a shot off at something.

But that's another reason to leave the PGF scene - if someone actually is bringing in dogs then all trails lead to Roger Patterson.

We thought about driving out to the edge of town today and maybe staying until dark to see if we can spot something. But we're not going to leave the car like those other people, no way. Maybe roll the windows down so we can listen for those knocks or calls.
 
Drewbot said:
ABP.
You're doing it (The Bigfoot Legend) wrong.

Dogs are, every one of them, afraid of Bigfoot. No exceptions. Unless they are specifically trained to NOT BE afraid of Bigfoot.
Click to expand...

How, exactly, does one train dogs to NOT be afraid of Bigfoot? Wouldn't such training require something along the lines of running down... a Bigfoot? The intricacies of Bigfoot dog hunting seem to be beyond my understanding. At what point can one confirm that a dog has been successfully trained to NOT BE AFRAID OF BIGFOOT? It can't be when said dog/s capture one... for the obvious reason. How do SERIOUS BIGFOOTERS conclude that a dog is, or is not, afraid of the forest monster? If the dog doesn't go off where the creature went, it is afraid? If it does take pursuit, but chickens out after a while, it isn't afraid? Without a bagged Bigfoot, wouldn't the only unafraid Bigfoot dogs, be dead dogs?

I am too dense to get this. Help me Drew, you're my only hope.
 
Last edited:
captain koolaid said:
How, exactly, does one train dogs to NOT be afraid of Bigfoot? Wouldn't such training require something along the lines of running down... a Bigfoot? The intricacies of Bigfoot dog hunting seem to be beyond my understanding. At what point can one confirm that a dog has been successfully trained to NOT BE AFRAID OF BIGFOOT? It can't be when said dog/s capture one... for the obvious reason. How do SERIOUS BIGFOOTERS conclude that a dog is, or is not, afraid of the forest monster? If the dog doesn't go off where the creature went, it is afraid? If it does take pursuit, but chickens out after a while, it isn't afraid? Without a bagged Bigfoot, wouldn't the only unafraid Bigfoot dogs, be dead dogs?

I am too dense to get this. Help me Drew, you're my only hope.
Click to expand...

I guess you don't get how Bigfootry works. Some people have lots of sightings, some people know how to get audio of Bigfoot, some people know how to train dogs that aren't afraid of Bigfoot.

When you are attempting to portray yourself as the World's foremost Bigfoot expert, clearly you must have special dogs, otherwise any dork with a bloodhound could track down the beast. Do you really think Roger had special Bigfoot dogs? Or do you think it was just a ploy to keep local dogs from visiting the site?
 
ufology said:
It was getting dark and they didn't go past the fence, so maybe this creature was able to jump the fence and land some distance away on the other side where the footprints weren't visible in the fading light. I don't think his wife was into climbing barbed wire fences after monsters in the dark, but perhaps if they had been able to cross over they may have picked up the trail again.
Click to expand...

The discovery of the century, fame, money and they lost out because of a barbed wire fence. Life is funny.
 
Drewbot said:
This is why Roger Patterson had to bring in specially trained "BIGFOOT DOGS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA", and didn't want the local bloodhounds to even bother tracking the beast. As a Bigfoot Expert, he knew the folly of sending simple police dogs after such a brute.
Click to expand...

If BF can throw a pig a dog hasn't got a chance.
 
Huffington Post interviews Renae, who sounds pretty reasonable until the end, and MM, who looks like he needs a bath and an intervention.

I have to say, I don't know how this show can go on for much longer. It may have attracted good ratings for Animal Planet, but it's just boringly the same each time. Not to mention MM's reported habits.
 
Last edited:
The host was brilliant. He "learned" what riparian meant on the day of the interview, which meant Ranae was an expert in gorillas and such. The ones with gills, I guess. It has always bothered me when a host is pretending that vocabulary beyond the 6th grade is some huge feat. She has an undergraduate degree and they are calling her a "research scientist" because she is an actor on a TV show.

It's painfully obvious that Ranae pretends to be a skeptic until she needs to rush in there to counter any kind of skeptical question. One of the worst lies is the claim about four hundred years of native bigfoot history. They know the difference between western legends like Paul Bunyan, the Easter Bunny, and Peter Pan vs. history. They know the difference between native folklore and reality too.

I'd have to agree the show can't just keep repeating the same format. The longer you stay at it the more obvious it becomes what they're up to.
 
"They're real and they're out there"

YG9Vw.jpg
 
GT/CS said:
A bigfoot-finding dog would be a great new prop for "Finding Bigfoot".
Click to expand...
That's a really good idea. Dogs don't know the 'truth' of Bigfoot. In theory they could get one to chase whatever they wanted. Say like a coyote they call Sasquatch. Bobo "Fay" Fey and Mutt Moneygrabber can then easily 'act' all real and stuff.

"It's so Squatchy around here. Wait. Shhhhhhh. Oh wow, look at that mofo dog go! Ha ha! Did you see that? That dog just opened a can of whoop ass on a poor unsuspecting Sasquatch." "Uh guys, we're in the public toilet in the Quahog bus station, it's not Squatchy around here. And who brought the dog?"

AlaskaBushPilot said:
...I'd have to agree the show can't just keep repeating the same format. The longer you stay at it the more obvious it becomes what they're up to.
Click to expand...
Yep. And that's the same curse that condemned the other Bigfoot TV shows. It's like they forget they're proposing the beast is real. An audience is willing to be teased a little, but there's only so many times you get to credibly 'act' like you almost got him. For Bobo and them to ultimately win, a real Bigfoot has to show up at some point in the game. I won't be shocked when/if one actually does. Cause you know it's always so Squatchy wherever they go. :eek:
 
Mellissa Hovey is allegedly posting a picture of a bigfoot at 1:00 eastern time. It is either the 'best photo of bigfoot since Patterson/Gimlin" or a very elaborate hoax. Supposedly she has been sitting on this for 4 years because the contributor would not respond to her emails. This all comes from Bigfoot Evidence and there doesn't seem to be enough pins and needles to go around. Any bets?
 
Today, amid much ballyhoo, renowned blogger and bigfootress Melissa Hovey revealed a supposed bigfoot photograph, given to her 4 years ago by an unknown person who has subsequently failed to call her the next day become extinct vanished from her speed dial the face of the earth.

Ever the drama queen, she writes:
First of all, thank you, to those who sent emails of support and messages on Facebook.
This is not about money, fortune or fame. If that were the case I would have done this a long time ago....I have been struggling these last 7 days. I don’t expect anyone to believe me, and I expect no sympathy.

I sat on this for 4 years
Click to expand...
Apparently it is about something to sit on.

Hovey seems to get advice from Melba Ketchum's PR person:
I totally understand this photo will be diced and sliced. Just remember to re-insert the copyright before you share privately or anywhere on the internet. I will enforce this.
Click to expand...

oh, plz don't throw a pig at me if I yoink yer oh so vallabull blogsquatch.

Here's the beauty of Melissa: someone gave her this photo. She said she would post it unless the person comes forward. The person comes forward and says don't publish now, wait a couple months. She decides to post it anyway. Then at the end she has the stones to write:
I feel comfortable with my decision. I have done all that I can.

For any witness who is wondering if I can keep a promise, the answer is yes. But, trust is a two way street. If you are honest with me, I am honest with you.
Click to expand...

Actually the answer is no. But then, up is down in the world of Bigfooters.

Anyway, here is the POS image she's talking about; supposedly from a game cam. I have no comment other than to cite Renae's reaction to Moneymaker's cattle story.
206lfl5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here's the link to the photo itself.

2012%2BWatermarked%2BGamcam%2BPhoto.jpg


The story says it is from a game cam. The thing that jumps out at me first are the plants in the background. They aren't far away, so the camera (if it was a game cam) must have been set up to watch the flowering bushes at night. The sasquatch seems to have wedged itself between the camera and the bush, possibly to smell the flowers? Are those honeysuckle, or clematus? Next, I thought that game cams used infrared flash, not visible white flash and color photos. Maybe there are various kinds, but most game cam photos I've seen tend to be B&W...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom