Various incidents from the past show that provenance and custody of scientific, literary, and artistic artifacts is often intentionally hidden by those bringing these things forward. Examples include:
1. David Rorvik. In his book In His Image, the Cloning of a Man Rorvik claimed first-hand association with the "rich industrialist" being cloned, but never named him.
2. Han van Meegeren. Van Meegeren always claimed that the paintings he brought forth were on behalf of individuals that wanted to remain anonymous.
3. Frank Hansen. Hansen's Minnesota Iceman was claimed to have been come into his possession via a "rich anonymous millionaire."
4. Cliff Crook. Crook claimed than an anonymous individual had provided his "Wild Creek" Bigfoot photos.
yahrightAccording to Joseph Smith, he returned the golden plates to Moroni after they were translated and as of 1838 the angel Moroni still had the plates in his possession.[1]
Florida skunk ape is another great example of anon photos emerging. (with the palm fronds)
Enlarged to 200%. The background foliage looks weird. Maybe this is a costume or mannequin.
[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/59c8da62.png[/qimg]
It's the back end of a small long-haired dog, looking from the front. What looks like the head is actually it's tail curled onto its back.
That's why the photo is so severely cropped.
I have asked for a photo from the builder. But it could be a rear view of the 'Beast from Echo Mountain' Bigfoot costume.
see Clawed - The Legend of Sasquatch (2005)
It's the back end of a small long-haired dog, looking from the front. What looks like the head is actually it's tail curled onto its back.
That's why the photo is so severely cropped.
Anyone with Netflix care to verify?
some guy who claims to be the maker of Clawed: the Legend of Sasquatch aka The Unknown aka the Beast from Echo Mountain has posted on Bigfoot Evidence that this is the suit from the movie. He says the foliage is identifiable in the film. Anyone with Netflix care to verify?
the foliage appears to be a loquat tree in the late fall. (loquats blossom in the fall and bear fruit in the winter-mild climates, possibly S. Cal.)
[qimg]http://i42.tinypic.com/24fboqt.jpg[/qimg]
Healy FX Studios said:To address the picture you attached, the hair has much more grey tone and length than we used on Ghost of Echo Mountain. I dont believe that this is from that movie. However, after the movie was released we made numerous copies of the head and body and sold them via our website and ebay...this could be one. In my opinion, the attached picture is absoluetly a costume. These types of costumes are manufactured in numerous pieces and it clearly shows the gap between shoulder and arm prosthetics, the fur is the bridge.
I received a response from HEALY FX STUDIOS.
...we made numerous copies of the head and body and sold them via our website and ebay...this could be one. In my opinion, the attached picture is absoluetly a costume...
This guy posted a video claiming Patty cannot be a human due to shin angle during walking:http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com...howComment=1330122117653#c8795670213003368624
This was then immediately disputed by a skeptic via his video here :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K9V1uUzu-U
I hope SweatiYeti reads this and checks out the rebuttal video at least. Pretty damning evidence IMO.