Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
HarryHenderson said:
:D Yer killin me. That's even funnier than the first one.
Click to expand...

Mind if a call you Leah? Shirley theres no harm in a little parody Leah.

:o

I think as long as it remains satire and parody we're ok lol. It's not like there is a lack of material to joke around with in the bigfoot world.
 
Bigfoot video from Utah. Somehow shows up on this ghosttheory site rather than CNN.
....a new video comes to us from some campers in the mountains of Utah.
Click to expand...
Go figure.

No sound, I guess they were laughing and had to erase it.

Of course they didn't chase it or shoot it, though they had guns.

Or find any footprints. But the previously undescribed bigfoot motel looks convincing.
 
Last edited:
Go to the YouTube page, and you will see that the poster is a huge Star Wars fan. And, if you look closely, that "Bigfoot" looks an awful lot like a Chewbacca costume.



Just sayin'
 
That was excellent work by Janos. Enjoyed that a lot, thanks for posting that Parcher.
 
How can you measure his height?
or his IM index?
He looks so small in that suit.
 
First, I'm really craving a Winston.

Next, here are some observations of Janos in action:

1) We've been told by Bill Munns that a "mime" in a fur suit like that would basically die of heat exhaustion after a few minutes of doing little more than walking around. There is Janos, on camera (with HOT studio lights), jumping around like he's in the freaking Cirque du Soleil for at least 7 minutes. 'Footer fail.

2) Sweaty, oh dear, sweet misguided Sweaty: Check out Janos' mask at 6:40 when he starts "grooming" the lady on the right. The mouth moves. (Remember, it's a mask.)

3) Check out the floppy feet around 5:03. I see a mid-tarsal break.
 
The Shrike said:
First, I'm really craving a Winston.

Next, here are some observations of Janos in action:

1) We've been told by Bill Munns that a "mime" in a fur suit like that would basically die of heat exhaustion after a few minutes of doing little more than walking around. There is Janos, on camera (with HOT studio lights), jumping around like he's in the freaking Cirque du Soleil for at least 7 minutes. 'Footer fail.
Click to expand...
If someone will give Munns $75,000, he promises to do better.*

*this is actually not true; he has not promised to do better.
 
Last edited:
If Janos had cavorted across Bluff Creek in front of Roger in that setup, and Roger had filmed him the same way he filmed Patty, would they have been able to tell that it was a hoax?

Would we be able to today?

That was 1961, too. Years before the PGF.

In 1967, the suit and head might have been done better.
 
I am starting to see how far back this goes. Hollywood had Charles Gemora in 1927 wearing a gorilla suit. There's 40 years pre-pgf. The girl-to-gorilla illusion has a history before that. It uses a mirror and plate glass called "pepper's ghost" trick to turn a show girl into a gorilla. She goes into this trick mirror-glass-lighting area and comes out as a gorilla, right at the crowd and scaring the heck out of everyone.

Conceivably, it could go back nearly a century pre-PGF. With actors in gorilla-type suits.
 
Bigfoot is really the only 'real' monster with a built in support infrastructure.

When the legend started really rolling in the late 60s, there were newsletters, clubs and magazines, in addition to the movies and TV shows. I remember my older cousin telling me bigfoot lived in the woods behind his house in the late 70s. (i was 6 or 7) I'm sure his older bros told him the same thing. If this could happen in a suburb of Detroit, imagine the stories out in the 'country'. now there are websites, with databases of sightings, groups telling people where to fibd BF, a pseudo scientific description of the beast, giving people a warm fuzzy about seeing the beast.
 
Drewbot said:
If this could happen in a suburb of Detroit, imagine the stories out in the 'country'.
Click to expand...

My observation about sightings is that they are by the townies driving along a highway or the one night camping trip with the heat-imaging camera that catches Bigfoot taking a candy bar from a stump.

This needs to be compared with the people living full-time on a ranch or farm next to a national forest, or myself or someone working in the field over eight thousand hours a year. So I graphed this out:


BigfootSightingEfficiency.jpg



It is the only field where sighting efficiency declines as more experience is gained. As a matter of fact from the graph it is clear that more than one full day in the field per year and the odds of sighting already drop below 30%.

Asymptotically, the staff here is confused over what it means to have infinite sightings with no time in the field, which is what our data analysis implies in the way of projections. But Bigfoot transcends science, so it is not surprising.
 
AlaskaBushPilot said:
My observation about sightings is that they are by the townies driving along a highway or the one night camping trip with the heat-imaging camera that catches Bigfoot taking a candy bar from a stump.

This needs to be compared with the people living full-time on a ranch or farm next to a national forest, or myself or someone working in the field over eight thousand hours a year. So I graphed this out:


[qimg]http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn180/lirajeanlogan/BigfootSightingEfficiency.jpg[/qimg]


It is the only field where sighting efficiency declines as more experience is gained. As a matter of fact from the graph it is clear that more than one full day in the field per year and the odds of sighting already drop below 30%.

Asymptotically, the staff here is confused over what it means to have infinite sightings with no time in the field, which is what our data analysis implies in the way of projections. But Bigfoot transcends science, so it is not surprising.
Click to expand...

That graph sums it up pretty efficiently. Kudos to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom