Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

[The Shrike]

Just spent a few days on a beach and studied human footprints a bit. Ours look very little like what gets passed off as squatch-prints: for example, our high arches show up very well on dry, wet, loose, or hard-packed sand. I did find one track with prints easily 14" in length. I suppose that one was a squatch.

 

[DennyT]

Craig "pull the Wool"-heater further damages his cred by presenting this joke as a possible white Bigfoot.
http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/white-bigfoot-penn/
2 seconds from the end.

Melba Ketchum was not involved ( as far as I know).

 

[William Parcher]

further damages his cred...

What credibility is there to damage?

 

[LTC8K6]

Just spent a few days on a beach and studied human footprints a bit. Ours look very little like what gets passed off as squatch-prints: for example, our high arches show up very well on dry, wet, loose, or hard-packed sand. I did find one track with prints easily 14" in length. I suppose that one was a squatch.

It's too much trouble to carve arches in the wood. Besides, the push off with a flat piece of wood is clearly enough to hook the believers.

 

[DennyT]

I did find one track with prints easily 14" in length. I suppose that one was a squatch.

OMG Were you that funny looking guy with the glasses that was following me?

 

[Deacondark]

Craig "pull the Wool"-heater further damages his cred by presenting this joke as a possible white Bigfoot.
http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/white-bigfoot-penn/
2 seconds from the end.

Melba Ketchum was not involved ( as far as I know).

Yeah, it's a pretty obvious costume. People don't even have to try hard to hoax the believers anymore. It's a shame really, people used to take pride in their craft....

 

[William Parcher]

Yeah, it's a pretty obvious costume. People don't even have to try hard to hoax the believers anymore. It's a shame really, people used to take pride in their craft....

Yeah, as you can see, them old school guys really had it nailed down...

 

[mikeyx]

Yeah, as you can see, them old school guys really had it nailed down...


[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/52ec6c47.png[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/bfdc06d7.png[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/58f785e8.png[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/f6d00f7a.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/d503e183.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/7085a1e9.jpg[/qimg]

is the third one wearing a fedora or a cowboy hat?

 

[LTC8K6]

is the third one wearing a fedora or a cowboy hat?

That's a Vulcan bigfoot.

 

[William Parcher]

is the third one wearing a fedora or a cowboy hat?

The third one is sitting on rocks. Is that the one you are questioning?

I don't know what happened with the deleted image. Here it is. Another bit of perfection from the old school. Obviously, this is all sarcasm pointed at Deacondark's statement that Bigfoot hoaxers used to take pride in their work.

 

[LTC8K6]

The third one is sitting on rocks. Is that the one you are questioning?

I don't know what happened with the deleted image. Here it is. Another bit of perfection from the old school. Obviously, this is all sarcasm pointed at Deacondark's statement that Bigfoot hoaxers used to take pride in their work.


[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/f9711260.jpg[/qimg]

Well, I just figured he meant Marx...I didn't even bother to count.

 

[DennyT]

Yeah, it's a pretty obvious costume. People don't even have to try hard to hoax the believers anymore. It's a shame really, people used to take pride in their craft....

Apparently this is the second go-round for the white Bigfoot...several years ago the video was claimed to be of an Australian Yowie. So says the bleever bunch.

 

[Deacondark]

Yeah, as you can see, them old school guys really had it nailed down...


[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/52ec6c47.png[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/bfdc06d7.png[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/58f785e8.png[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/f6d00f7a.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/d503e183.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/7085a1e9.jpg[/qimg]

Bahahahahahaha. Awesome. As bad as those are, it still looks like they put forth way more effort than folks do now. I get tickled by the guys who go on and on about "bigfoot morphology" and then show pictures where no two of them look anything alike. Bigfootery watching is the ultimate laugh.

 

[Deacondark]

Apparently this is the second go-round for the white Bigfoot...several years ago the video was claimed to be of an Australian Yowie. So says the bleever bunch.

The same video? The one now being claimed as "filmed in Pennsylvania"? Interesting. I wonder how they'll try to play that off.

 

[William Parcher]

Parn, do you maybe have this white one confused with this Yowie video?

 

[Drewbot]

I saw this white bigfoot video a year ago or something.


This one was put on Youtube 1.5 years ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9mODuktTEw
I saw the link to it on FB or something maybe a Youtube selection or something.

 

[Gilbert Syndrome]

Parn, do you maybe have this white one confused with this Yowie video?

"And the nominee's for the Worst Australian Actors of the Decade are...."

 

[William Parcher]

From the blog of "Silver Fox" - the new dynamic force in Bigfootery. Suddenly busting into the scene like a honey badger.

Silver Fox (Robert Lindsay) is banned from BFF.

 

[DennyT]

Ohio footer Marc DeWerth addresses Rotary Club, describes his formative 1997 bigfoot encounter, which he video'd.
http://www.reviewtimes.com/Issues/2...11_story1.asp?d=080911_story1,2011,Aug,09&c=n

And

http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/newcomerstown.htm

Whoops, what Marc DeWerth didnt tell the Rotarians: a 2003 video analysis of his 1997 "encounter" doesn't show Bigfoot:
http://www.angelfire.com/oh/ohiobigfoot/april97report.html:
"There are several factors, which have brought me to my conclusion. The First issue is the fact that three people were at the film site, and all of them were at fairly close range to the creatures Marc described. And yet, only Marc actually saw the creatures, and then only through his camcorder viewfinder. At no point where any of the creatures seen with the naked eye, nor where any tracks found or other evidence collected at the site.

Close examination of the video in slow motion has convinced me that the Key facial features of the creature were actually an out-of-focus branch, swaying in the breeze. Given the fact that Marc was at the limit of his camera's zoom range, and the fact that the camera's viewfinder by it's nature makes the image two dimensional, it is understandable that Marc could have interpreted a face in the image he was viewing. The camcorder's hunting for focus, however, reveals that these key components of the creature's face were not in the same focal plane as the outline of the creature's head. The face seen in the video was in all probability an illusion of light and shadow, enhanced by the camcorder's lens and viewfinder."

 

[LTC8K6]

After some 15 minutes of trying to spot the creature(s) with the naked eye, his own video camera, DeWerth's video camera and a failed attempt to flush the animal/creature out of the underbrush, Keating, DeWerth and Myers decided to head back to Newcomerstown.

I see the trend continues...get close to what you think might be a bigfoot, then clear out of the area immediately...