You're dead without God dictating how cell's interact with eachother.
God doesn't. That would be biochemistry
You can't pull another breath of air.
God doesn't breathe for me. My lungs do
You can't absorb nutrients from food in your digestive system without God.
God doesn't digest my food. My gut does.
The sun doesn't burn out.
God doesn't keep the sun burning. That would be nuclear fusion.
The earth doesn't go careening off into space.
And while the thing which keeps it in orbit begins with a G, it is not God
There must be something tangible there somewhere.
There are lots of tangible things. None of them appears to be God.
You can feel the heat of the sun - isn't that tangible?
Yes. And it is caused by nuclear fission.
The tangible examples are all around you. Now, what you have to ask yourself is: "Do I want to accept the tangible evidence of God's love?"
No, what I have to ask myself is: "Is this tangible evidence of God's love?
Or "Do I simply dismiss all tangible evidence given in the name of ultimate skepticism?"
Why do they all drivel out the same witless nonsense? The Christians, the alien abductees, the aura healers? They all spam out exactly the same gibble. They are all desperate not to argue with real opinions of real people but imaginary, made-up opinions of imaginary people. In this case, "ultimate scepticism". Why do they all have to take refuge from reality in this way? Oh yes, I remember...
"Ultimate skepticism: the denial of any offered explanation." Might be too much of a good thing?
This describes the position of precisely no-one in the entire world. Well, I suppose people with toy swords are obliged to fight only against straw men. But have you any idea how stupid it makes you look? No, silly question, of course you don't.
