Not well. It took a while (and a lot of blood) for those ideals to be implemented as fully as they should have been. But unlike the French revolution, those ideals were put into practice, even if limited practice. Your example is particularly hollow given that free speech was an example of limited government, and one of the central operating principles of the French Revolution was that the revolutionary government should not be constrained in order to succeed. But that's hardly the only irony: you have been arguing for the existence of free speech elsewhere and also against the very notion of free speech as a good thing. Don't think I've forgotten your justifications for censorship. Back flip indeed.