• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Alien Visitation Contact Proof

cjdelphi said:
Yeah the whole video is a complete waste of time because that entire second went missing, totally useless evidence
Click to expand...

But you attributed that missing second to you being abducted/transported and the process in which you were abducted/transported disrupted time!

:boggled:
 
Gamolon said:
But you thought it was missed because of the alien technology disrupting time and now we know it's a camera/software glitch.

:boggled:
Click to expand...

Camera glitch missing time, imagine missing an entire second of a movie! It would completely ruin it, make no sense at all

That 1second means everything and without that 1 second, this video shows nothing it's all a waste of time without that 1 extremely valuable second

All murderers, rapists should be released of just 1 second is missing on the tape, it makes it completely useless as evidence

You're absolutely right about everything!
 
cjdelphi said:
We will get confirmation they are real and watching us in hopefully 5 to 10 years we are all waiting on the next round of government videos to get leaked!
Click to expand...

The ones leaked and/or released already have not exactly been convincing evidence, more of the same will be a long way from "confirmation they are real". So what exactly is it you are expecting to happen in 5 to 10 years?
 
Blue Mountain said:
Thanks for posting that video. It appears to be the one you got from the SD card, since an internal timestamp matches the clock in the video itself.

The content isn't the "raw" data—that is, the data coming off the sensors. (And even that has some built-in limitations to reduce the amount of data being sent to the camera's computer.) The video stream has been compressed using the High Efficiency Video Coding standard (commonly known as HVEC, also known as H.265 or MPEG-H part 2.) It's an incredibly hairy and complex specification, which much smarter people than I have implemented in the camera's computer.

So what we're all looking at has already been processed and compressed. How much information was lost during that processing is anyone's guess; the standard probably aims at losing as little information as possible while still presenting a picture that's good enough for the human eyes and brain to interpret. As was noted before, the sound is mono. The video runs at 10 frames per second at HD1080 size (1920 pixels wide by 1080 high.)

cjdelphi, I'm curious to know what tools you used to analyze the video frame by frame, and which video you used for your analysis.

For me, I played the video using VLC and used Pause/Next frame to get the frames. I compromised by using a screen capture to save a copy of the frames I was interested in, using JPEG format, which means I may have lost a little bit more information during that conversion. If I really wanted to, I could use ffmpeg to dump the frames of interest as TIFF files. They'd be pretty large, but I'd know I'd be getting the best the MP4 file has to offer.

In any event, it's very interesting comparing the last frame (number 10 of 10) of 03:57:14 with the first two frames of 03:57:15. There is very clearly a light source somewhere behind the big tree in the centre of the frame that very briefly illuminates the windscreen, hood (bonnet) and trunk (boot) lid of the parked car, reflects off a panel of some sort in the house in the background, backlights the leaves in the tree in the centre of the frame, shines on the top of the bush at the end of the walk on the right hand side, and the walk itself. The light source appears to be high (the upper leaves in the tree were backlit, but not the lower ones) and to left.

The source could be a light on a utility pole. I see some evidence of such a pole in the background: there are three vehicles in the midground, which I'll number going from right (the most visible one) to left. It looks like there's a pole behind the roofline of #2. Am I right? And if it is a pole, is there a light on it to illuminate the parking lot?
Click to expand...

Ohhh nice, finally someone who can actually investigate ...

I can only watch that file and not hear it on my phone as I don't have the codec for it, I've not looked what bitrate, color anything, I just pulled the card out and copied it!

Here's the photos around the place

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_FBbHsgFuineWJvKS09a9wtiluqFp6KO/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YT_Ub4x6hpZJq9-O3pIghdbVQm5pSpNK/view?usp=drivesdk


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X33Z1s0QuwdgNQvybHHkGREFg1JORNbF/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YW4oPbo2dhpTExlirb-abPTWvyKpsdBF/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X33Z1s0QuwdgNQvybHHkGREFg1JORNbF/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XCv-_4ZoxpfkEqX7UBIxDG53EJi4W-HP/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XdYhHLY3rI8wtByvtlRNeXd7AweC9LBg/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YblAoLjwUgQjrd6TzqCM0Zf-aat2XOM1/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XmNSm3iOeM8WSKUicpof5iYWfj7Zg3T-/view?usp=drivesdk

Indoors

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YDPF1FHQc_lR4VzTlAlsVdbmG1cAP-TZ/view?usp=drivesdk

Copying links from Google is laborious as having to view them separately so you do have my apologies
 
cjdelphi said:
But before the second went missing, you can see the same flash of light but this time with the power on still

But yeah, the vital missing evidence is in that missing second no so this video means nothing ok, I see where this is heading you lost the argument
Click to expand...

If you're talking about the same point of light as I think you mean (but who can tell?) what is there in that direction? All we have to work with is a low resolution video. You can look from your camera's viewpoint in daylight. What's there?
 
xterra said:
Not unless you go after a different audience. This one clearly has rejected your claim.


Actually, I don't.
Click to expand...

Any attentions be good or bad generates public interest, the more you reply the more this topic will be seen, that's what I want, to generate as much interest as possible

I'd rather have 100 people see this and have the possibility of it happening to people vs 100 people never seeing it and never knowing alien visitation takes place
 
xterra said:
Not unless you go after a different audience. This one clearly has rejected your claim.


Actually, I don't.
Click to expand...

Pixel42 said:
The ones leaked and/or released already have not exactly been convincing evidence, more of the same will be a long way from "confirmation they are real". So what exactly is it you are expecting to happen in 5 to 10 years?
Click to expand...

I'm expecting the the navy to release high resolution detailed photos of these craft, they surrounded them on the Nimitz encounter by the time their jet fighters got to where they were going the UFOs were waiting

The navy plays games with them and airline pilots keep quiet about them, I'm convinced we are going to see up close and personal and if people can't handle flir UAPs videos up close photos isn't going to go down well

And once people find out they have been abducting us for a long time, shock will turn to disgust before you die
 
bruto said:
The very theme here.
Click to expand...

Place enough speculation into a court room and you will get a conviction likewise place enough doubt into the court room you will get off

Add my evidence to the navy and all the others it's mounting up...

Time is all I need to be proved right
 
cjdelphi said:
Place enough speculation into a court room and you will get a conviction likewise place enough doubt into the court room you will get off

Add my evidence to the navy and all the others it's mounting up...

Time is all I need to be proved right
Click to expand...
That may be but it has not yet happened. Saying it will is not a substitute for that.
 
Norman Alexander said:
I understand it is considered poor practice to psychoanalyze other posters on this forum. So I will just say that I happened to come across this interesting and possibly relevant article.

And with that, I'm no longer playing this silly game.
Click to expand...

Your article mentions crop circles, more bs, your article is written about people with sleep disturbances and mental health issues

None of which have evidence to suggest anything happens, the people who saw flashes of light have evidence but are clueless as to what

They are here!
 
cjdelphi said:
Any attentions be good or bad generates public interest, the more you reply the more this topic will be seen, that's what I want, to generate as much interest as possible

I'd rather have 100 people see this and have the possibility of it happening to people vs 100 people never seeing it and never knowing alien visitation takes place
Click to expand...

Getting scoffed at on a relatively obscure skeptics board isn’t really the kind of exposure you think it is.

But if you had seen what you really claimed you saw (an interstellar spacecraft hovering just off the ground in your city using ion thrust), you would have had thousands of witnesses shocked into wakefulness by the light show and thunder. That is an unavoidable consequence of your central premise. That you refuse to consider it indicates quite clearly that you’re not interested in even acknowledging, let alone learning from your mistakes, so further engagement with you is a waste of time. Bye.
 
cjdelphi said:
Look at the first cover up of a ufo late 1800s the army said ufo then weather balloon ...
Click to expand...

Okay, I actually think this is a new one on me. Ring a bell with anyone else?

What year? Which country? What army spokesperson in the 1800s said "UFO" then "weather balloon"? And if that's just a paraphrase, what did they actually say?
 
It's all so confusing!

cjdelphi said:
Awareness, banging my head against the wall makes more people look at the video, job well done don't you agree?
Click to expand...

Are the aliens in the room with us right now?

Can you show us on the doll where the aliens touched you?

Or didn't touch you?
 
sts60 said:
Getting scoffed at on a relatively obscure skeptics board isn’t really the kind of exposure you think it is.

But if you had seen what you really claimed you saw (an interstellar spacecraft hovering just off the ground in your city using ion thrust), you would have had thousands of witnesses shocked into wakefulness by the light show and thunder. That is an unavoidable consequence of your central premise. That you refuse to consider it indicates quite clearly that you’re not interested in even acknowledging, let alone learning from your mistakes, so further engagement with you is a waste of time. Bye.
Click to expand...

Wrong again it would shock nobody but a skeptic ...

Nobody cares I was visited, this Is about exposing what really goes on but since the truth shocks you and you refuse to even consider it, but one day soon, it's going to come out and will you then apologise?

Nah, you're a skeptic
 
cjdelphi said:
Your article mentions crop circles, more bs, your article is written about people with sleep disturbances and mental health issues

None of which have evidence to suggest anything happens, the people who saw flashes of light have evidence but are clueless as to what

They are here!
Click to expand...

Yet the believers in crop circles are as adamant as you are that their evidence is undeniable. Funny that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom