Alien Visitation Contact Proof

[Pixel42]

What are UAPs? Flying light bulbs?

There are numerous explanations for UAPs. A small percentage are unexplained, because there is insufficient information available to explain them. Whilst alien spacecraft cannot always be completely ruled out, there is no UAP which justifies ruling them in.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

It's not a contradiction.

They are not hiding their presence, they hover in the sky for ages at a time...

What they are concealing is abduction victims I have no memory they hid it from me and those people who experienced I bet they too if asked were also very tired ..

Now compare that to abduction victims who claim they were abducted and remember it, they all had sleep terrors I don't believe true abduction cases have any memory so not only am I telling you it happened I'm also telling you those crazies who remember it are remembering a dream or hallucination

Your fairytale story suggests they have to fly so low to abduct people that their engines cause power cuts and that the only symptom of having been abducted is extreme tiredness. Can you show a correlation between claimed abductions and unexplained power cuts? Can you show a correlation between unexplained power cuts and unexplained extreme exhaustion?

 

[cjdelphi]

I've been assured that will happen any day now all my life. I'll be 69 on Sunday. How much longer must I wait?

Look at the first cover up of a ufo late 1800s the army said ufo then weather balloon there's definitely cover ups going on regarding UFOs

After Roswell, it got swept under the carpet and men in black silences people by threatening their jobs and ufos went on the back burner

In the 90s disclosure took place in Europe and shared information

Nothing much happens until 2014 when the Nimitz encounter took place, then we have about 5 or 6 uap videos, they get leaked a few years later and we all see it as of a couple of years ago

We've not had a ufo Congress meeting in 50 years, we have people saying the government has much much more and we are slowly being dripped information

I highly expect more classified videos to come public including close up photos of alien drones and craft, we have seen their technology in FLiR now we need to see it optically in our visible light spectrum

And the guys there swear they have it, Luis elizondo and his team says they even have craft, that's where I draw the line until I see the evidence

A school in Africa and Australia have both witnessed ufos landing

My true feelings is that these craft are alien or future human and simply landing to go pee in a bush, the officer in 1963 who saw them land said they went behind a rock, either to pee or have a quicky

I think they avoid human contact because we are all walking petri dishes carrying lethal bacteria and viruses, cut yourself and you died before antibiotics so do I blame them? Dying is too easy on this planet to want to live here

Got covid?

We will get confirmation they are real and watching us in hopefully 5 to 10 years we are all waiting on the next round of government videos to get leaked!

 

[Olmstead]

In an effort not to play the OPs game of constantly shifting goalposts, I'd just like to point to the only two things in the video that haven't been completely explained yet (explanations have been given, but the OP doesn't play nice and wants a 1:1 recreation or something):

- The noise recorded by the camera.
- Part of a tree getting a little brighter the moment all the lights start going out:

There's nothing else in the video worth talking about anymore. I don't think there's any way to conclusively prove the source of either of these, but if anyone still feels like taking a crack at it, there it is.

 

[Gamolon]

What they are concealing is abduction victims

So they use LIGHT BASED search beams for abductions?! Superior aliens huh?

I have no memory they hid it from me

You have no memory because it didn't happen. You based your "abduction" on the missing second in the video which we now know was due to glitching camera or it's software. You even admitted this. The ONLY supposed evidence you have is a "flash of light".

 

[Gamolon]

In an effort not to play the OPs game of constantly shifting goalposts, I'd just like to point to the only two things in the video that haven't been completely explained yet (explanations have been given, but the OP doesn't play nice and wants a 1:1 recreation or something):

- The noise recorded by the camera.
- Part of a tree getting a little brighter the moment all the lights start going out:

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1454&pictureid=13171[/qimg]

There's nothing else in the video worth talking about anymore. I don't think there's any way to conclusively prove the source of either of these, but if anyone still feels like taking a crack at it, there it is.

Notice the color of that light matches what's on the sidewalk to the right. The shadows of the bushes put the light source off camera to the right.

 

[cjdelphi]

Your fairytale story suggests they have to fly so low to abduct people that their engines cause power cuts and that the only symptom of having been abducted is extreme tiredness. Can you show a correlation between claimed abductions and unexplained power cuts? Can you show a correlation between unexplained power cuts and unexplained extreme exhaustion?

I can show you the relation there definitely is one

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/752886/Electrical-power-CUTS-Aylesbury-Buckinghamshire-UFO

There's also a farm in romania where the strange lights got closer and next thing they know total darkness

I think tiredness is just a result of being awake for a period of time but no memory

 

[cjdelphi]

Your fairytale story suggests they have to fly so low to abduct people that their engines cause power cuts and that the only symptom of having been abducted is extreme tiredness. Can you show a correlation between claimed abductions and unexplained power cuts? Can you show a correlation between unexplained power cuts and unexplained extreme exhaustion?

So they use LIGHT BASED search beams for abductions?! Superior aliens huh?



You have no memory because it didn't happen. You based your "abduction" on the missing second in the video which we now know was due to glitching camera or it's software. You even admitted this. The ONLY supposed evidence you have is a "flash of light".

But before the second went missing, you can see the same flash of light but this time with the power on still

But yeah, the vital missing evidence is in that missing second no so this video means nothing ok, I see where this is heading you lost the argument

 

[Carrot Flower King]

A stack of nothing is still nothing.

How did you establish it wasn't witches?

He ignored me when I asked about incubuses and succubuses and grey hags and the rest...

And I forgot to ask about Russians with snow on their boots or fairy/elven kingdoms beneath hills and folk who disappear into those for years...

 

[xterra]

cjdelphi,

You have shown us your evidence, discussed your hypotheses, argued that you are correct and that people who disagree are either not seeing the truth or are deliberately denying it.

Will you stay here and continue to argue, to beat your head against a wall, to try to persuade people you're correct?

Or will you decide that your efforts on this forum are useless and you're no longer going to waste time and energy on us?


If the latter, what is your next step?

 

[cjdelphi]

https://www.syracusenewtimes.com/nov-9-1965-did-ufos-turn-the-lights-off/

Here she says the power issues were brown outs, if brown out occurs here, the relay shuts them down, no question

Different system, here it was clean off and I hear nothing powering back up and I see nothing powering up nothing did power up until over an hour later to make any kind of digital noise

Oh and the other thing... only skeptics reply, the ones on the line crap their pants seeing it, skeptics don't see it or refuse to see it

 

[Gamolon]

But before the second went missing, you can see the same flash of light but this time with the power on still

But yeah, the vital missing evidence is in that missing second no so this video means nothing ok, I see where this is heading you lost the argument

Funny how you're attitude towards your own evidence changed when it became apparent it was nothing more than a camera/software glitch.

Gotta love that.

 

[cjdelphi]

cjdelphi,

You have shown us your evidence, discussed your hypotheses, argued that you are correct and that people who disagree are either not seeing the truth or are deliberately denying it.

Will you stay here and continue to argue, to beat your head against a wall, to try to persuade people you're correct?

Or will you decide that your efforts on this forum are useless and you're no longer going to waste time and energy on us?


If the latter, what is your next step?

Awareness, banging my head against the wall makes more people look at the video, job well done don't you agree?

 

[Gamolon]

https://www.syracusenewtimes.com/nov-9-1965-did-ufos-turn-the-lights-off/

Here she says the power issues were brown outs, if brown out occurs here, the relay shuts them down, no question

Different system, here it was clean off and I hear nothing powering back up and I see nothing powering up nothing did power up until over an hour later to make any kind of digital noise

Oh and the other thing... only skeptics reply, the ones on the line crap their pants seeing it, skeptics don't see it or refuse to see it

You must have missed my post.

You think people who believe in bigfoot are nut jobs yet they provide the same type of evidence you do regarding aliens.

Pictures, videos, personal encounters...

How does that work?

 

[cjdelphi]

Funny how you're attitude towards your own evidence changed when it became apparent it was nothing more than a camera/software glitch.

Gotta love that.

Yeah the whole video is a complete waste of time because that entire second went missing, totally useless evidence

 

[cjdelphi]

You must have missed my post.

You think people who believe in bigfoot are nut jobs yet they provide the same type of evidence you do regarding aliens.

Pictures, videos, personal encounters...

How does that work?

Because unlike you, I've looked into it all....

I ran out of evidence for bigfoot and ghosts and collected my own evidence for alien visitation, twice!

But yeah, all those murderers on camera stabbing shooting people 1 second goes missing 1 camera glitch.. throw it out useless evidence, it could have been anyone or anything attacking them once a second goes missing!

 

[Olmstead]

Notice the color of that light matches what's on the sidewalk to the right. The shadows of the bushes put the light source off camera to the right.

I think his point is that it suddenly gets brighter just when all the lights start failing.

I have a few theories about why that could be, but those are a complete layman's opinions:

- a light shining brighter for a moment just before it goes out
- optical illusion due to changing light conditions
- camera adjusting to changing light conditions

But I have no idea if any of these make sense.

 

[Gamolon]

Yeah the whole video is a complete waste of time because that entire second went missing, totally useless evidence

But you thought it was missed because of the alien technology disrupting time and now we know it's a camera/software glitch.

 

[sts60]

Facts

An ion drive to lift that craft is not possible by us, …

Everything else you posted is irrelevant. I’m not talking about your claims about the electrical power in your area. I’m talking about the physical effects that would be required for your claim to be true.

What do you think a dense hypersonic stream of charged particles sufficient to lift a crewed interstellar spacecraft at ground level would look and sound like? Hint: it would not be the brief subdued buzzes and flashlight-like effects you report. And you and your insomniac neighbor would not be the only persons awake.

It wouldn’t be like someone using the Wunderland Treatymaker on your city, but what you describe wouldn’t earn more than a raised eyebrow from the sternest librarian. That’s unphysical.

 

[Blue Mountain]

I was tired af for about 5 days like I was awake for 7 or 8 hours, not felt tired like that since I flew from the uk to Australia

I think that light is like a transporter beam, it happens twice once right as the power goes out.. and at the 15th second

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YObe0N-CTYeLK2LFqzBcUOu2FnZ7Lgzz/view?usp=drivesdk

(snip)

Thanks for posting that video. It appears to be the one you got from the SD card, since an internal timestamp matches the clock in the video itself.

The content isn't the "raw" data—that is, the data coming off the sensors. (And even that has some built-in limitations to reduce the amount of data being sent to the camera's computer.) The video stream has been compressed using the High Efficiency Video Coding standard (commonly known as HVEC, also known as H.265 or MPEG-H part 2.) It's an incredibly hairy and complex specification, which much smarter people than I have implemented in the camera's computer.

So what we're all looking at has already been processed and compressed. How much information was lost during that processing is anyone's guess; the standard probably aims at losing as little information as possible while still presenting a picture that's good enough for the human eyes and brain to interpret. As was noted before, the sound is mono. The video runs at 10 frames per second at HD1080 size (1920 pixels wide by 1080 high.)

cjdelphi, I'm curious to know what tools you used to analyze the video frame by frame, and which video you used for your analysis.

For me, I played the video using VLC and used Pause/Next frame to get the frames. I compromised by using a screen capture to save a copy of the frames I was interested in, using JPEG format, which means I may have lost a little bit more information during that conversion. If I really wanted to, I could use ffmpeg to dump the frames of interest as TIFF files. They'd be pretty large, but I'd know I'd be getting the best the MP4 file has to offer.

In any event, it's very interesting comparing the last frame (number 10 of 10) of 03:57:14 with the first two frames of 03:57:15. There is very clearly a light source somewhere behind the big tree in the centre of the frame that very briefly illuminates the windscreen, hood (bonnet) and trunk (boot) lid of the parked car, reflects off a panel of some sort in the house in the background, backlights the leaves in the tree in the centre of the frame, shines on the top of the bush at the end of the walk on the right hand side, and the walk itself. The light source appears to be high (the upper leaves in the tree were backlit, but not the lower ones) and to left.

The source could be a light on a utility pole. I see some evidence of such a pole in the background: there are three vehicles in the midground, which I'll number going from right (the most visible one) to left. It looks like there's a pole behind the roofline of #2. Am I right? And if it is a pole, is there a light on it to illuminate the parking lot?